1.Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children in Singapore.
Karen Donceras NADUA ; Chia Yin CHONG ; Kai Qian KAM ; Yee Hui MOK ; Jonathan Tze Liang CHOO ; Joyce Ching Mei LAM ; Jiahui LI ; Natalie Woon Hui TAN ; Chee Fu YUNG ; Su Wan Bianca CHAN ; Kai Liang TEH ; Lena DAS ; Thaschawee ARKACHAISRI ; Koh Cheng THOON
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2022;51(11):669-676
INTRODUCTION:
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a rare inflammatory syndrome with multisystem involvement affecting children exposed to COVID-19. This condition is rarely reported in East Asia and was not detected in Singapore until 2021. We present 12 cases of MIS-C diagnosed in KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) from October 2021 to December 2021.
METHOD:
We conducted an observational study on cases fulfilling the Singapore Ministry of Health criteria for MIS-C from January 2020 to December 2021 in KKH. Medical records were reviewed to obtain information on clinical presentation, disease course, treatment received and outcomes.
RESULTS:
In the 12 cases detected, the median age was 7.50 years (interquartile range 4.00-9.25); 8 were male. All patients had mucocutaneous symptoms similar to Kawasaki disease. Other commonly involved systems were: haematological (coagulopathy 100%, lymphopaenia 91.70% and thrombocytopaenia 75.00%), gastrointestinal (75.00%) and cardiovascular (83.30%). Six patients (50.00%) had shock and were admitted to the intensive care unit. The majority of patients received treatment within 2 days of hospitalisation with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and steroids. All survived; the majority had normal echocardiograms and no long-term organ sequelae at 6 months post-discharge.
CONCLUSION
MIS-C emerged in Singapore as the incidence of COVID-19 in the community increased in 2021. The clinical presentation of our patients is similar to earlier reports, with some significant differences from Kawasaki disease. Multidisciplinary management, timely diagnosis, and early initiation of treatment with IVIg and steroids likely contributed to comparatively good outcomes. Our cases highlight the need for continued awareness of MIS-C among physicians, and surveillance of its incidence, short- and long-term outcomes.
Child
;
Humans
;
Female
;
Male
;
COVID-19/epidemiology*
;
Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome
;
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use*
;
Aftercare
;
Singapore/epidemiology*
;
Patient Discharge
3.Screening for congenital heart disease in a Singapore neonatal unit.
Alvin Jia-Hao NGEOW ; Mary Grace TAN ; Jonathan Tze-Liang CHOO ; Teng-Hong TAN ; Wei Ching TAN ; Daisy Kwai-Lin CHAN
Singapore medical journal 2021;62(7):341-346
INTRODUCTION:
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of infant mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a neonatal screening programme for CHD before the introduction of pulse oximetry.
METHODS:
This was a retrospective review of live births in the period 2003-2012. Cases of CHD were detected through prenatal ultrasonography and/or postnatal examination, and confirmed using two-dimensional echocardiography. Data was rigorously checked against multiple sources. The antenatal detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of the screening programme were analysed for all cases of CHD and critical CHD.
RESULTS:
The incidence of CHD was 9.7 per 1,000 live births. The commonest CHD was ventricular septal defect (54.8%). The antenatal detection rate was three times higher in the critical CHD group (64.0%) compared to the group as a whole (21.1%). The sensitivity and specificity of screening was 64.5% and 99.7% for all CHD, and 92.9% and 99.1% for the critical CHD group, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 215 and 103, while the negative likelihood ratio was 0.36 and 0.07 for all CHD and critical CHD, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The CHD screening programme had excellent specificity but limited sensitivity. The high positive likelihood ratios indicate that where sufficient risk factors for CHD are present, a positive result effectively confirms the presence of CHD. The low negative likelihood ratio for critical CHD indicates that, where prior suspicion for critical CHD is low, a negative result is reassuring.