1.Facial Rejuvenation Enhancing Cheek Lift.
Philippe BELLITY ; Jonathan BELLITY
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2017;44(6):559-563
Supported by recent literature on the signs of aging of the middle and lower face, our clinical research has documented a loss of volume of the deep structural components of the central face and a progressive descent of the nasolabial fat and the jowl fat, leading to facial fragmentation. The signs that appear around the age of 45 to 50 years are well targeted by the mini-invasive technique described here. We focused on refitting the jowl fat and the nasolabial fat associated with cutaneous tightening. The use of absorbable barbed sutures (Quill) led to significant improvements, enabling the fitting of fat on fat. In the past 4 years, 167 operations were performed using this technique. The clinical results were very satisfactory, yielding a natural effect caused by the mobilization and strong fixation of the nasolabial fat and the jowl fat in the direction opposite to their displacement.
Aging
;
Cheek*
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
;
Rejuvenation*
;
Rhytidoplasty
;
Sutures
2.Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases.
Alejandra ORTIZ ; Rita ORTIZ ; Evelyn SOTO ; Jonathan HARTMANN ; Alejandro MANZUR ; Marcelo MARCONI
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2016;43(2):102-105
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the semen parameters of two successive samples obtained within an interval of less than 60 minutes from patients planning to undergo intrauterine insemination (IUI) whose first samples exhibited low semen quality. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. On the day of IUI, the semen analysis of the samples initially presented by all patients met at least two of the following criteria: sperm concentration <5×10(6)/mL, total sperm count <10×10(6), progressive sperm motility (a+b) in the native sample <30%, and total motile sperm count (TMSC) <4×10(6). A successive semen sample was obtained no more than 60 minutes after the first sample. RESULTS: Compared to the first sample, the second exhibited significantly (p<0.05) improved sperm concentration, TMSC, progressive motility, and vitality. Regarding TMSC, the most critical parameter on the day of IUI, 23 patients (71.8%) improved it, while nine (28.2%) displayed poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: In defined cases, requesting a second successive ejaculate on the day of insemination may result in a high percentage of cases in an improvement of the quality of the sample.
Humans
;
Insemination*
;
Semen Analysis
;
Semen*
;
Sperm Count
;
Sperm Motility
;
Spermatozoa