1.Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow: a case report and literature review.
Chen YANG ; Wei LI ; Yu-bao GONG ; Shu-qiang LI ; Xin QI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2010;13(6):380-382
Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow describes a condition that radial head subluxation or dislocation occurs when forearm rotates externally in relation to humerus. It is difficult to diagnose and treat. We reported a typical case which was confirmed by physical examination and MR images. Ligamentous insufficiency was confirmed under direct vision, and was reconstructed with triceps fascia as described by Gong et al with slight modification. Regain of full function was achieved one year after surgery.
Adult
;
Elbow Joint
;
physiopathology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Joint Instability
;
complications
;
diagnosis
;
physiopathology
;
surgery
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Shoulder Dislocation
;
complications
2.Operative treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis with lumbar instability.
Guang-Lei LI ; Yong WEI ; Shang-Feng QI ; Hai-Bo ZHU ; Qiang-Min DUAN ; Yun-Liang LÜ ; Shi-Yong LÜ ; Fu-Dong LI ; Hong-Guang XU
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2008;21(2):130-131
Adult
;
Aged
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Joint Instability
;
complications
;
diagnosis
;
physiopathology
;
surgery
;
Lumbar Vertebrae
;
pathology
;
physiopathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Spinal Canal
;
pathology
;
physiopathology
;
Spinal Stenosis
;
complications
;
diagnosis
;
physiopathology
;
surgery
3.Unstable Simple Elbow Dislocation Treated with the Repair of Lateral Collateral Ligament Complex.
Youn Moo HEO ; Jin Woong YI ; Jung Bum LEE ; Dae Hee LEE ; Won Keun PARK ; Sun Joong KIM
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2015;7(2):241-247
BACKGROUND: Unstable simple elbow dislocation (USED) repair is challenged by the maintenance of joint reduction; hence, primary repair or reconstruction of disrupted ligaments is required to maintain the congruency and allow early motion of the elbow. We evaluated the effectiveness and the outcome of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex repair with additional medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair in cases of USED. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 21 cases of diagnosed USED without fractures around the elbow that were treated with primary ligament repair. In all cases, anatomical repair of LCL complex with or without common extensor origin was performed using suture anchor and the bone tunnel method. Next, the instability and congruency of elbow for a full range of motion were evaluated under the image intensifier. MCL was repaired only if unstable or incongruent elbow was observed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and radiographic outcomes on last follow-up images. RESULTS: All cases achieved a stable elbow on radiographic and clinical results. LCL complex repair alone was sufficient to obtain the stable elbow in 17 of 21 cases. Four cases required additional MCL repair after restoration of the LCL complex. The overall mean MEPS was 91 (range, 70 to 100): excellent in 12 cases, good in 7 cases, and fair in 2 cases. All 17 cases with LCL complex repair only and 2 of 4 cases with additional MCL repair had excellent or good results by MEPS. CONCLUSIONS: USED requires surgical treatment to achieve a congruent and stable joint. If the repair of lateral stabilizer such as LCL complex acquires enough joint stability to maintain a full range of motion, it may not be necessary to repair the medial stabilizer in all cases of USED.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Collateral Ligaments/*surgery
;
Dislocations/complications/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Elbow Joint/*injuries/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Joint Instability/complications/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Orthopedic Procedures/methods
;
Range of Motion, Articular
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Young Adult
4.Arthroscopic Bankart repair augmented by plication of the inferior glenohumeral ligament via horizontal mattress suturing for traumatic shoulder instability.
Kong Hwee LEE ; Henry SOEHARNO ; Chee Ping CHEW ; Denny LIE
Singapore medical journal 2013;54(10):555-559
INTRODUCTIONThis study aimed to evaluate the two-year clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair augmented by plication of the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) via horizontal mattress suturing.
METHODSThis study was a retrospective analysis of 76 arthroscopic Bankart repairs by a single surgeon from 2004 to 2008. Bioabsorbable suture anchors were used, with anchors placed at the 5:30, 4 and 3 o'clock positions of the right shoulder (correspondingly at the 6:30, 8 and 9 o'clock positions for the left shoulder). The lower most anchor was tied via horizontal mattress suture with plication of the IGHL, while the remaining two anchors were tied using simple sutures. The patients were postoperatively assessed, clinically and using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale.
RESULTSThe mean age of the patients at the time of presentation was 24.09 ± 7.98 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 28.7 months. The postoperative recurrence rate of dislocation was 7.89% (six shoulders), of which five shoulders required revision surgeries. Excluding the revision cases, clinical assessment of the strength of the supraspinatus and the range of motion of the operated shoulders at two years post operation were either maintained or full in all patients. Analysis of the UCLA results showed pre- and postoperative mean scores of 25.94 ± 3.43 and 33.77 ± 3.07, respectively (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONArthroscopic Bankart repair augmented by plication of the IGHL and anchored via horizontal mattress suturing is a safe and reliable treatment for shoulder instability, with good clinical outcomes and low recurrence rates.
Adult ; Arthroscopy ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joint Instability ; etiology ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Male ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Shoulder Dislocation ; complications ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Shoulder Joint ; injuries ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Suture Anchors ; Suture Techniques ; instrumentation ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
5.Selection of the internal fixation for various types of intertrochanteric fracture in aged patients and prevention for complication.
Xin GE ; Jian-Ming ZHANG ; Wei-Cheng LU ; Shui-Qiang QIU
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2009;22(5):385-386
OBJECTIVETo investigate the results and indication of differently internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture and prevent for complication.
METHODSOne hundred and two patients of intertrochanteric fracture of femur from January 1997 to December 2007 were reviewed and analysed. There were 46 males and 56 females, with an average age of 76.5 years ranging from 60 to 93 years. There were 34 cases of stability fractures and 68 of instability fractures. The methods of internal fixation included dynamic hip screw in 82 cases, proximal interlocking nail in 5, multi-screw fixation in 9, dynamic codylar screw in 6.
RESULTSThese patients were followed up for 6 to 72 months (36 months in average). The time of fracture healing was from 8 to 12 weeks. According to evaluation criterion of effect, the results were excellent in 72 cases, good in 20, fair in 10. After operation, there were 3 cases of coax vara, 2 cases of lag screws cutting out, 1 case of breakage of screw, 2 cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, 1 case of postoperative infection, 1 case of delayed union.
CONCLUSIONSuitable implant selection according the type of fracture, health condition is an important factor to reduce the incidence of complication for unstable fracture in aged patients. DHS is a main treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. PFN is recommended for serious osteoporosis or unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Compression screws is a choice for the fixation of type I and type II fracture of bad health condition.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; methods ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ; methods ; Fracture Healing ; physiology ; Hip Fractures ; complications ; surgery ; Humans ; Joint Instability ; physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control
6.Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients with Generalized Joint Laxity.
Sung Jae KIM ; Praveen KUMAR ; Sung Hwan KIM
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2010;2(3):130-139
Generalized joint laxity is a genetically determined component of overall joint flexibility. The incidence of joint laxity in the overall population is approximately 5% to 20%, and its prevalence is higher in females. Recently it was noticed that individuals with generalized joint laxity are not only prone to anterior cruciate ligament injuries but also have inferior results after a reconstruction. Therefore, an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized laxity should be undertaken with caution due to the higher expected failure rate from the complexity of problems associated with this condition. It is also necessary to identify the risk factors for the injury as well as for the post operative outcome in this population. A criterion that includes all the associated components is necessary for the proper screening of individuals for generalized joint laxity. Graft selection for an anterior cruciate reconstruction in patients with ligament laxity is a challenge. According to the senior author, a hamstring autograft is an inferior choice and a double bundle reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon-bone autograft yields better results than a single bundle bone-patella tendon-bone autograft. Future studies comparing the different grafts available might be needed to determine the preferred graft for this subset of patients. Improved results after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be achieved by proper planning and careful attention to each step beginning from the clinical examination to the postoperative rehabilitation.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament/*injuries/*surgery
;
Bone Transplantation/methods
;
Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft/methods
;
Humans
;
Joint Instability/*complications/physiopathology
;
Range of Motion, Articular
;
*Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
;
Risk Factors
;
Tendons/transplantation
;
Treatment Outcome