1.Skin Thickness of the Anterior, Anteromedial, and Anterolateral Thigh: A Cadaveric Study for Split-Skin Graft Donor Sites.
Jeffrey C Y CHAN ; John WARD ; Fabio QUONDAMATTEO ; Peter DOCKERY ; John L KELLY
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2014;41(6):673-678
BACKGROUND: The depth of graft harvest and the residual dermis available for reepithelization primarily influence the healing of split-skin graft donor sites. When the thigh region is chosen, the authors hypothesize based on thickness measurements that the anterolateral region is the optimal donor site. METHODS: Full-thickness skin specimens were sampled from the anteromedial, anterior, and anterolateral regions of human cadavers. Skin specimens were cut perpendicularly with a custom-made precision apparatus to avoid the overestimation of thickness measurements. The combined epidermal and dermal thicknesses (overall skin thickness) were measured using a digital calliper. The specimens were histologically stained to visualize their basement membrane, and microscopy images were captured. Since the epidermal thickness varies across the specimen, a stereological method was used to eliminate observer bias. RESULTS: Epidermal thickness represented 2.5% to 9.9% of the overall skin thickness. There was a significant difference in epidermal thickness from one region to another (P<0.05). The anterolateral thigh region had the most consistent and highest mean epidermal thickness (60+/-3.2 microm). We observed that overall skin thickness increased laterally from the anteromedial region to the anterior and anterolateral regions of the thigh. The overall skin thickness measured 1,032+/-435 microm in the anteromedial region compared to 1,220+/-257 microm in the anterolateral region. CONCLUSIONS: Based on skin thickness measurements, the anterolateral thigh had the thickest epidermal and dermal layers. We suggest that the anterolateral thigh region is the optimal donor site for split-skin graft harvests from the thigh.
Basement Membrane
;
Cadaver*
;
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
;
Dermis
;
Humans
;
Microscopy
;
Observer Variation
;
Photomicrography
;
Skin*
;
Thigh*
;
Tissue Donors*
;
Transplants*
2.An automated dispensing system for improving medication timing in the emergency department
Ward J. MICHAEL ; Boyd S. JEREMY ; Harger J. NICOLE ; Deledda M. JOHN ; Smith L. CAROL ; Walker M. SUSAN ; Hice D. JEFFREY ; Hart W. KIMBERLY ; Lindsell J. CHRISTOPHER ; Wright W. STEWART
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2012;3(2):102-107
BACKGROUND: Numerous medical conditions require timely medication administration in the emergency department (ED). Automated dispensing systems (ADSs) store premixed common doses at the point-of-care to minimize time to administration, but the use of such automation to improved time to medication administration has not been studied. Since vancomycin is a commonly used empiric antimicrobial, we sought to quantify the effect of using an ADS on time to drug delivery in patients presenting to the ED. The study aimed to determine the efficacy of utilizing an ADS to improve time to administration of vancomycin and determine any negative effects on dosing appropriateness.METHODS: The institional review board approved the retrospective quality improvement study took place in a single, urban academic tertiary care ED with an annual census of 80000. Study subjects were all patients receiving vancomycin for the management of sepsis between March 1 to September 30, 2008 and the same time period in 2009. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received vancomycin within one hour of bed placement and the secondary outcome was dosing appropriateness.RESULTS: Sixty-three patients had weight and dosing information available (29 before and 34 after intervention) and were included in the study. Before intervention, no patient received vancomycin in less than 60 minutes, while after intervention 14.7% of the patients received it in less than 60 minutes (difference in proportions 14.7%, 95% CI 0.39%-30.0%, P=0.04). A similar proportion of the patients received correct dosing before and after intervention (44.8% vs. 41.2%, difference in proportions 3.7%, 95% CI -20.0%-26.7%, P=0.770).CONCLUSION: The use of an ADS may improve the timing of medication administration in patients presenting to the ED without affecting dosing appropriateness.