1.Levels of Evidence in the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Citation Analysis of the Top 50 'Classic' Papers.
Kenneth M JOYCE ; Cormac W JOYCE ; John C KELLY ; Jack L KELLY ; Sean M CARROLL
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2015;42(4):411-418
BACKGROUND: The plastic surgery literature is vast, consisting of a plethora of diverse articles written by a myriad of illustrious authors. Despite this considerable archive of published material, it remains nebulous as to which precise papers have had the greatest impact on our specialty. The aim of this study was to identify the most cited papers in the plastic surgery literature and perform a citation analysis paying particular attention to the evidence levels of the clinical studies. METHODS: We identified the 50 most cited papers published in the 20 highest impact plastic surgery journals through the Web of Science. The articles were ranked in order of number of citations acquired and level of evidence assessed. RESULTS: The top 50 cited papers were published in six different journals between the years 1957 and 2007. Forty-two of the papers in the top 50 were considered as level IV or V evidence. No level I or II evidence was present in the top 50 list. The average level of evidence of the top 50 papers was 4.28. CONCLUSIONS: In the plastic surgery literature, no positive correlation exists between a high number of citations and a high level of evidence. Anatomical reconstructive challenges tend to be the main focus of plastic surgery rather than pathologic diseases and consequently, papers with lower levels of evidence are relatively more valuable in plastic surgery than many other specialties.
Archives
;
Bibliometrics
;
Surgery, Plastic*
2.Skin Thickness of the Anterior, Anteromedial, and Anterolateral Thigh: A Cadaveric Study for Split-Skin Graft Donor Sites.
Jeffrey C Y CHAN ; John WARD ; Fabio QUONDAMATTEO ; Peter DOCKERY ; John L KELLY
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2014;41(6):673-678
BACKGROUND: The depth of graft harvest and the residual dermis available for reepithelization primarily influence the healing of split-skin graft donor sites. When the thigh region is chosen, the authors hypothesize based on thickness measurements that the anterolateral region is the optimal donor site. METHODS: Full-thickness skin specimens were sampled from the anteromedial, anterior, and anterolateral regions of human cadavers. Skin specimens were cut perpendicularly with a custom-made precision apparatus to avoid the overestimation of thickness measurements. The combined epidermal and dermal thicknesses (overall skin thickness) were measured using a digital calliper. The specimens were histologically stained to visualize their basement membrane, and microscopy images were captured. Since the epidermal thickness varies across the specimen, a stereological method was used to eliminate observer bias. RESULTS: Epidermal thickness represented 2.5% to 9.9% of the overall skin thickness. There was a significant difference in epidermal thickness from one region to another (P<0.05). The anterolateral thigh region had the most consistent and highest mean epidermal thickness (60+/-3.2 microm). We observed that overall skin thickness increased laterally from the anteromedial region to the anterior and anterolateral regions of the thigh. The overall skin thickness measured 1,032+/-435 microm in the anteromedial region compared to 1,220+/-257 microm in the anterolateral region. CONCLUSIONS: Based on skin thickness measurements, the anterolateral thigh had the thickest epidermal and dermal layers. We suggest that the anterolateral thigh region is the optimal donor site for split-skin graft harvests from the thigh.
Basement Membrane
;
Cadaver*
;
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
;
Dermis
;
Humans
;
Microscopy
;
Observer Variation
;
Photomicrography
;
Skin*
;
Thigh*
;
Tissue Donors*
;
Transplants*
3.p53 gene transfer does not enhance E2F-1-mediated apoptosis in human colon cancer cells.
John M DRAUS ; Mary Jane ELLIOTT ; Cesar ATIENZA ; Ariel STILWELL ; Sandra L WONG ; Yanbin DONG ; Hailiang YANG ; Kelly M MCMASTERS
Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2001;33(4):209-219
E2F-1 and p53 are sequence specific transcription factors that are intimately involved in the regulation of the cell cycle. In addition to their role in cell cycle control, both E2F-1 and p53 have been identified as tumor suppressors and mediators of apoptosis. We have shown previously that adenoviral-mediated E2F-1 overexpression induces efficient apoptosis in colon adenocarcinoma cells. Previous reports have suggested that E2F-1 and p53 cooperate to mediate apoptosis and therefore, in this study, we examined the efficacy of combination gene therapy using adenovirus vectors expressing E2F-1 and p53 in human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines, HT-29 and SW620 (both mutant p53). Cells were treated by mock infection or infection with adenoviral vectors expressing b-galactosidase (LacZ), E2F-1, p53 or a combination of E2F-1 and p53. IC25 concentrations of each virus were estimated and used for each treatment in order to detect any synergistic or cooperative effects on tumor cell death in the combination therapy. By 5 days post infection, E2F-1-overexpressing cells exhibited growth inhibition and approximately 40-50% cell death in both cell lines. Co-expression of p53 with E2F-1 abrogated E2F-1-mediated growth inhibition and cell death. Cell cycle analysis revealed that overexpression of E2F-1 resulted in an accumulation of cells in G2/M phase, while overexpression of p53 resulted in a G1 phase accumulation. However, co-expression of E2F-1 and p53 counteracted each other as fewer cells accumulated in G1 and G2/M when compared to either p53 or E2F-1 alone. Furthermore, co-expression of p53 with E2F-1 resulted in decreased levels of E2F-1 protein expression. Mechanistically, upregulation of the CDK inhibitory protein, p21(WAF1/CIP1), was demonstrated in HT-29 cells following overexpression of either E2F-1, p53 or the combination E2F-1/p53 therapy. However, in SW620 cells, only the cells infected with Ad-p53 alone or in combination resulted in upregulation of p21(WAF1/CIP1). These results suggest that p53 and p21(WAF1/CIP1) may cooperate to inhibit the expression and activity of E2F-1. In conclusion, combination adenoviral vector-mediated E2F-1 and p53 gene transfer was not therapeutically advantageous in this in vitro model of human colon adenocarcinoma.
Adenocarcinoma/*metabolism/pathology
;
Adenoviridae/genetics
;
Apoptosis/*physiology
;
Cell Cycle
;
Cell Division
;
Colonic Neoplasms/*metabolism/pathology
;
Comparative Study
;
Cyclins
;
Gene Expression
;
Gene Therapy
;
Gene Transfer Techniques
;
*Genes, p53
;
Genetic Vectors
;
HT29 Cells
;
Human
;
Protein p53/genetics/*metabolism
;
Recombinant Proteins/metabolism
;
Transcription Factors/genetics/metabolism/physiology
;
Tumor Cells, Cultured
;
Up-Regulation
4.p53 gene transfer does not enhance E2F-1-mediated apoptosis in human colon cancer cells.
John M DRAUS ; Mary Jane ELLIOTT ; Cesar ATIENZA ; Ariel STILWELL ; Sandra L WONG ; Yanbin DONG ; Hailiang YANG ; Kelly M MCMASTERS
Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2001;33(4):209-219
E2F-1 and p53 are sequence specific transcription factors that are intimately involved in the regulation of the cell cycle. In addition to their role in cell cycle control, both E2F-1 and p53 have been identified as tumor suppressors and mediators of apoptosis. We have shown previously that adenoviral-mediated E2F-1 overexpression induces efficient apoptosis in colon adenocarcinoma cells. Previous reports have suggested that E2F-1 and p53 cooperate to mediate apoptosis and therefore, in this study, we examined the efficacy of combination gene therapy using adenovirus vectors expressing E2F-1 and p53 in human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines, HT-29 and SW620 (both mutant p53). Cells were treated by mock infection or infection with adenoviral vectors expressing b-galactosidase (LacZ), E2F-1, p53 or a combination of E2F-1 and p53. IC25 concentrations of each virus were estimated and used for each treatment in order to detect any synergistic or cooperative effects on tumor cell death in the combination therapy. By 5 days post infection, E2F-1-overexpressing cells exhibited growth inhibition and approximately 40-50% cell death in both cell lines. Co-expression of p53 with E2F-1 abrogated E2F-1-mediated growth inhibition and cell death. Cell cycle analysis revealed that overexpression of E2F-1 resulted in an accumulation of cells in G2/M phase, while overexpression of p53 resulted in a G1 phase accumulation. However, co-expression of E2F-1 and p53 counteracted each other as fewer cells accumulated in G1 and G2/M when compared to either p53 or E2F-1 alone. Furthermore, co-expression of p53 with E2F-1 resulted in decreased levels of E2F-1 protein expression. Mechanistically, upregulation of the CDK inhibitory protein, p21(WAF1/CIP1), was demonstrated in HT-29 cells following overexpression of either E2F-1, p53 or the combination E2F-1/p53 therapy. However, in SW620 cells, only the cells infected with Ad-p53 alone or in combination resulted in upregulation of p21(WAF1/CIP1). These results suggest that p53 and p21(WAF1/CIP1) may cooperate to inhibit the expression and activity of E2F-1. In conclusion, combination adenoviral vector-mediated E2F-1 and p53 gene transfer was not therapeutically advantageous in this in vitro model of human colon adenocarcinoma.
Adenocarcinoma/*metabolism/pathology
;
Adenoviridae/genetics
;
Apoptosis/*physiology
;
Cell Cycle
;
Cell Division
;
Colonic Neoplasms/*metabolism/pathology
;
Comparative Study
;
Cyclins
;
Gene Expression
;
Gene Therapy
;
Gene Transfer Techniques
;
*Genes, p53
;
Genetic Vectors
;
HT29 Cells
;
Human
;
Protein p53/genetics/*metabolism
;
Recombinant Proteins/metabolism
;
Transcription Factors/genetics/metabolism/physiology
;
Tumor Cells, Cultured
;
Up-Regulation
5.Global Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Mortality
Thanh N. NGUYEN ; Muhammad M. QURESHI ; Piers KLEIN ; Hiroshi YAMAGAMI ; Mohamad ABDALKADER ; Robert MIKULIK ; Anvitha SATHYA ; Ossama Yassin MANSOUR ; Anna CZLONKOWSKA ; Hannah LO ; Thalia S. FIELD ; Andreas CHARIDIMOU ; Soma BANERJEE ; Shadi YAGHI ; James E. SIEGLER ; Petra SEDOVA ; Joseph KWAN ; Diana Aguiar DE SOUSA ; Jelle DEMEESTERE ; Violiza INOA ; Setareh Salehi OMRAN ; Liqun ZHANG ; Patrik MICHEL ; Davide STRAMBO ; João Pedro MARTO ; Raul G. NOGUEIRA ; ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Georgios TSIVGOULIS ; Virginia Pujol LEREIS ; Alice MA ; Christian ENZINGER ; Thomas GATTRINGER ; Aminur RAHMAN ; Thomas BONNET ; Noémie LIGOT ; Sylvie DE RAEDT ; Robin LEMMENS ; Peter VANACKER ; Fenne VANDERVORST ; Adriana Bastos CONFORTO ; Raquel C.T. HIDALGO ; Daissy Liliana MORA CUERVO ; Luciana DE OLIVEIRA NEVES ; Isabelle LAMEIRINHAS DA SILVA ; Rodrigo Targa MARTÍNS ; Letícia C. REBELLO ; Igor Bessa SANTIAGO ; Teodora SADELAROVA ; Rosen KALPACHKI ; Filip ALEXIEV ; Elena Adela CORA ; Michael E. KELLY ; Lissa PEELING ; Aleksandra PIKULA ; Hui-Sheng CHEN ; Yimin CHEN ; Shuiquan YANG ; Marina ROJE BEDEKOVIC ; Martin ČABAL ; Dusan TENORA ; Petr FIBRICH ; Pavel DUŠEK ; Helena HLAVÁČOVÁ ; Emanuela HRABANOVSKA ; Lubomír JURÁK ; Jana KADLČÍKOVÁ ; Igor KARPOWICZ ; Lukáš KLEČKA ; Martin KOVÁŘ ; Jiří NEUMANN ; Hana PALOUŠKOVÁ ; Martin REISER ; Vladimir ROHAN ; Libor ŠIMŮNEK ; Ondreij SKODA ; Miroslav ŠKORŇA ; Martin ŠRÁMEK ; Nicolas DRENCK ; Khalid SOBH ; Emilie LESAINE ; Candice SABBEN ; Peggy REINER ; Francois ROUANET ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Stefan BOSKAMP ; Joshua MBROH ; Simon NAGEL ; Michael ROSENKRANZ ; Sven POLI ; Götz THOMALLA ; Theodoros KARAPANAYIOTIDES ; Ioanna KOUTROULOU ; Odysseas KARGIOTIS ; Lina PALAIODIMOU ; José Dominguo BARRIENTOS GUERRA ; Vikram HUDED ; Shashank NAGENDRA ; Chintan PRAJAPATI ; P.N. SYLAJA ; Achmad Firdaus SANI ; Abdoreza GHOREISHI ; Mehdi FARHOUDI ; Elyar SADEGHI HOKMABADI ; Mazyar HASHEMILAR ; Sergiu Ionut SABETAY ; Fadi RAHAL ; Maurizio ACAMPA ; Alessandro ADAMI ; Marco LONGONI ; Raffaele ORNELLO ; Leonardo RENIERI ; Michele ROMOLI ; Simona SACCO ; Andrea SALMAGGI ; Davide SANGALLI ; Andrea ZINI ; Kenichiro SAKAI ; Hiroki FUKUDA ; Kyohei FUJITA ; Hirotoshi IMAMURA ; Miyake KOSUKE ; Manabu SAKAGUCHI ; Kazutaka SONODA ; Yuji MATSUMARU ; Nobuyuki OHARA ; Seigo SHINDO ; Yohei TAKENOBU ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kazunori TOYODA ; Takeshi UWATOKO ; Nobuyuki SAKAI ; Nobuaki YAMAMOTO ; Ryoo YAMAMOTO ; Yukako YAZAWA ; Yuri SUGIURA ; Jang-Hyun BAEK ; Si Baek LEE ; Kwon-Duk SEO ; Sung-Il SOHN ; Jin Soo LEE ; Anita Ante ARSOVSKA ; Chan Yong CHIEH ; Wan Asyraf WAN ZAIDI ; Wan Nur Nafisah WAN YAHYA ; Fernando GONGORA-RIVERA ; Manuel MARTINEZ-MARINO ; Adrian INFANTE-VALENZUELA ; Diederik DIPPEL ; Dianne H.K. VAN DAM-NOLEN ; Teddy Y. WU ; Martin PUNTER ; Tajudeen Temitayo ADEBAYO ; Abiodun H. BELLO ; Taofiki Ajao SUNMONU ; Kolawole Wasiu WAHAB ; Antje SUNDSETH ; Amal M. AL HASHMI ; Saima AHMAD ; Umair RASHID ; Liliana RODRIGUEZ-KADOTA ; Miguel Ángel VENCES ; Patrick Matic YALUNG ; Jon Stewart Hao DY ; Waldemar BROLA ; Aleksander DĘBIEC ; Malgorzata DOROBEK ; Michal Adam KARLINSKI ; Beata M. LABUZ-ROSZAK ; Anetta LASEK-BAL ; Halina SIENKIEWICZ-JAROSZ ; Jacek STASZEWSKI ; Piotr SOBOLEWSKI ; Marcin WIĄCEK ; Justyna ZIELINSKA-TUREK ; André Pinho ARAÚJO ; Mariana ROCHA ; Pedro CASTRO ; Patricia FERREIRA ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Luísa FONSECA ; Teresa PINHO E MELO ; Miguel RODRIGUES ; M Luis SILVA ; Bogdan CIOPLEIAS ; Adela DIMITRIADE ; Cristian FALUP-PECURARIU ; May Adel HAMID ; Narayanaswamy VENKETASUBRAMANIAN ; Georgi KRASTEV ; Jozef HARING ; Oscar AYO-MARTIN ; Francisco HERNANDEZ-FERNANDEZ ; Jordi BLASCO ; Alejandro RODRÍGUEZ-VÁZQUEZ ; Antonio CRUZ-CULEBRAS ; Francisco MONICHE ; Joan MONTANER ; Soledad PEREZ-SANCHEZ ; María Jesús GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ ; Marta GUILLÁN RODRÍGUEZ ; Gianmarco BERNAVA ; Manuel BOLOGNESE ; Emmanuel CARRERA ; Anchalee CHUROJANA ; Ozlem AYKAC ; Atilla Özcan ÖZDEMIR ; Arsida BAJRAMI ; Songul SENADIM ; Syed I. HUSSAIN ; Seby JOHN ; Kailash KRISHNAN ; Robert LENTHALL ; Kaiz S. ASIF ; Kristine BELOW ; Jose BILLER ; Michael CHEN ; Alex CHEBL ; Marco COLASURDO ; Alexandra CZAP ; Adam H. DE HAVENON ; Sushrut DHARMADHIKARI ; Clifford J. ESKEY ; Mudassir FAROOQUI ; Steven K. FESKE ; Nitin GOYAL ; Kasey B. GRIMMETT ; Amy K. GUZIK ; Diogo C. HAUSSEN ; Majesta HOVINGH ; Dinesh JILLELA ; Peter T. KAN ; Rakesh KHATRI ; Naim N. KHOURY ; Nicole L. KILEY ; Murali K. KOLIKONDA ; Stephanie LARA ; Grace LI ; Italo LINFANTE ; Aaron I. LOOCHTAN ; Carlos D. LOPEZ ; Sarah LYCAN ; Shailesh S. MALE ; Fadi NAHAB ; Laith MAALI ; Hesham E. MASOUD ; Jiangyong MIN ; Santiago ORGETA-GUTIERREZ ; Ghada A. MOHAMED ; Mahmoud MOHAMMADEN ; Krishna NALLEBALLE ; Yazan RADAIDEH ; Pankajavalli RAMAKRISHNAN ; Bliss RAYO-TARANTO ; Diana M. ROJAS-SOTO ; Sean RULAND ; Alexis N. SIMPKINS ; Sunil A. SHETH ; Amy K. STAROSCIAK ; Nicholas E. TARLOV ; Robert A. TAYLOR ; Barbara VOETSCH ; Linda ZHANG ; Hai Quang DUONG ; Viet-Phuong DAO ; Huynh Vu LE ; Thong Nhu PHAM ; Mai Duy TON ; Anh Duc TRAN ; Osama O. ZAIDAT ; Paolo MACHI ; Elisabeth DIRREN ; Claudio RODRÍGUEZ FERNÁNDEZ ; Jorge ESCARTÍN LÓPEZ ; Jose Carlos FERNÁNDEZ FERRO ; Niloofar MOHAMMADZADEH ; Neil C. SURYADEVARA, MD ; Beatriz DE LA CRUZ FERNÁNDEZ ; Filipe BESSA ; Nina JANCAR ; Megan BRADY ; Dawn SCOZZARI
Journal of Stroke 2022;24(2):256-265
Background:
and Purpose Recent studies suggested an increased incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We evaluated the volume of CVT hospitalization and in-hospital mortality during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of 171 stroke centers from 49 countries. We recorded COVID-19 admission volumes, CVT hospitalization, and CVT in-hospital mortality from January 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021. CVT diagnoses were identified by International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) codes or stroke databases. We additionally sought to compare the same metrics in the first 5 months of 2021 compared to the corresponding months in 2019 and 2020 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04934020).
Results:
There were 2,313 CVT admissions across the 1-year pre-pandemic (2019) and pandemic year (2020); no differences in CVT volume or CVT mortality were observed. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT volumes compared to 2019 (27.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.2 to 32.0; P<0.0001) and 2020 (41.4%; 95% CI, 37.0 to 46.0; P<0.0001). A COVID-19 diagnosis was present in 7.6% (132/1,738) of CVT hospitalizations. CVT was present in 0.04% (103/292,080) of COVID-19 hospitalizations. During the first pandemic year, CVT mortality was higher in patients who were COVID positive compared to COVID negative patients (8/53 [15.0%] vs. 41/910 [4.5%], P=0.004). There was an increase in CVT mortality during the first 5 months of pandemic years 2020 and 2021 compared to the first 5 months of the pre-pandemic year 2019 (2019 vs. 2020: 2.26% vs. 4.74%, P=0.05; 2019 vs. 2021: 2.26% vs. 4.99%, P=0.03). In the first 5 months of 2021, there were 26 cases of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), resulting in six deaths.
Conclusions
During the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVT hospitalization volume and CVT in-hospital mortality did not change compared to the prior year. COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with higher CVT in-hospital mortality. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT hospitalization volume and increase in CVT-related mortality, partially attributable to VITT.