1.The Interaction of Cognitive Interference, Standing Surface, and Fatigue on Lower Extremity Muscle Activity
Christopher M HILL ; Hunter DEBUSK ; Jeffrey D SIMPSON ; Brandon L MILLER ; Adam C KNIGHT ; John C GARNER ; Chip WADE ; Harish CHANDER
Safety and Health at Work 2019;10(3):321-326
BACKGROUND: Performing cognitive tasks and muscular fatigue have been shown to increase muscle activity of the lower extremity during quiet standing. A common intervention to reduce muscular fatigue is to provide a softer shoe-surface interface. However, little is known regarding how muscle activity is affected by softer shoe-surface interfaces during static standing. The purpose of this study was to assess lower extremity muscular activity during erect standing on three different standing surfaces, before and after an acute workload and during cognitive tasks. METHODS: Surface electromyography was collected on ankle dorsiflexors and plantarflexors, and knee flexors and extensors of fifteen male participants. Dependent electromyography variables of mean, peak, root mean square, and cocontraction index were calculated and analyzed with a 2 × 2 × 3 within-subject repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Pre-workload muscle activity did not differ between surfaces and cognitive task conditions. However, greater muscle activity during post-workload balance assessment was found, specifically during the cognitive task. Cognitive task errors did not differ between surface and workload. CONCLUSIONS: The cognitive task after workload increased lower extremity muscular activity compared to quite standing, irrespective of the surface condition, suggesting an increased demand was placed on the postural control system as the result of both fatigue and cognitive task.
Ankle
;
Electromyography
;
Fatigue
;
Humans
;
Knee
;
Lower Extremity
;
Male
;
Muscle Fatigue
2.Cervical Vagal Nerve Stimulation Activates the Stellate Ganglion in Ambulatory Dogs.
Kyoung Suk RHEE ; Chia Hsiang HSUEH ; Jessica A HELLYER ; Hyung Wook PARK ; Young Soo LEE ; Jason GARLIE ; Patrick ONKKA ; Anisiia T DOYTCHINOVA ; John B GARNER ; Jheel PATEL ; Lan S CHEN ; Michael C FISHBEIN ; Thomas EVERETT ; Shien Fong LIN ; Peng Sheng CHEN
Korean Circulation Journal 2015;45(2):149-157
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies showed that, in addition to parasympathetic nerves, cervical vagal nerves contained significant sympathetic nerves. We hypothesized that cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) may capture the sympathetic nerves within the vagal nerve and activate the stellate ganglion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recorded left stellate ganglion nerve activity (SGNA), left thoracic vagal nerve activity (VNA), and subcutaneous electrocardiogram in seven dogs during left cervical VNS with 30 seconds on-time and 30 seconds off time. We then compared the SGNA between VNS on and off times. RESULTS: Cervical VNS at moderate (0.75 mA) output induced large SGNA, elevated heart rate (HR), and reduced HR variability, suggesting sympathetic activation. Further increase of the VNS output to >1.5 mA increased SGNA but did not significantly increase the HR, suggesting simultaneous sympathetic and parasympathetic activation. The differences of integrated SGNA and integrated VNA between VNS on and off times (DeltaSGNA) increased progressively from 5.2 mV-s {95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-9.06, p=0.018, n=7} at 1.0 mA to 13.7 mV-s (CI: 5.97-21.43, p=0.005, n=7) at 1.5 mA. The difference in HR (DeltaHR, bpm) between on and off times was 5.8 bpm (CI: 0.28-11.29, p=0.042, n=7) at 1.0 mA and 5.3 bpm (CI 1.92 to 12.61, p=0.122, n=7) at 1.5 mA. CONCLUSION: Intermittent cervical VNS may selectively capture the sympathetic components of the vagal nerve and excite the stellate ganglion at moderate output. Increasing the output may result in simultaneously sympathetic and parasympathetic capture.
Animals
;
Autonomic Nervous System
;
Dogs*
;
Electrocardiography
;
Heart Rate
;
Stellate Ganglion*
;
Vagus Nerve Stimulation*