Neoplasm Metastasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is a need for a simple and practical tool adapted for the diagnosis of chronic constipation (CC) in the Asian population. This study compared the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association (ANMA) CC tool and Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of CC in Asian subjects. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study included subjects presenting at outpatient gastrointestinal clinics across Asia. Subjects with CC alert symptoms completed a combination Diagnosis Questionnaire to obtain a diagnosis based on 4 different diagnostic methods: self-defined, investigator's judgment, ANMA CC tool, and Rome III criteria. The primary endpoint was the level of agreement/disagreement between the ANMA CC diagnostic tool and Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of CC. RESULTS: The primary analysis comprised of 449 subjects, 414 of whom had a positive diagnosis according to the ANMA CC tool. Rome III positive/ANMA positive and Rome III negative/ANMA negative diagnoses were reported in 76.8% and 7.8% of subjects, respectively, resulting in an overall percentage agreement of 84.6% between the 2 diagnostic methods. The overall percentage disagreement between these 2 diagnostic methods was 15.4%. A higher level of agreement was seen between the ANMA CC tool and self-defined (374 subjects [90.3%]) or investigator’s judgment criteria (388 subjects [93.7%]) compared with the Rome III criteria. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the ANMA CC tool can be a useful for Asian patients with CC.
Asia ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group* ; Constipation* ; Cross-Sectional Studies* ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Judgment ; Outpatients

In the last two decades gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), initially thought to be a disease only common  in the West, is described  increasingly in Asia, including the Philippines. A recent local report indicated that the prevalence of erosive esophagitis (EE), a common complication of GERD, has more than doubled, i.e., 2.9% to  6.3%,  between the two time periods of 1994-1997 and 2000-2003, respectively. GERD causes recurrent annoying symptoms which are common  reasons  for  clinic  visits  and consultations thus, it is the objective of these guidelines to provide both primary care physicians  (PCPs) and specialists a current, evidence-based, country-specific recommendations for the optimal management  of  GERD.  These  guidelines  are  intended   to   empower   PCPs   to   make   a   clinic-based diagnosis of GERD, to start an empiric acid-suppressive therapy in the appropriate patient,and direct them to select which GERD patient may need to undergo investigations to ascertain further the diagnosis of GERD or to assess outcomes of therapy. We acknowledge that studies published in the future may influence the impact on our confidence on the recommendations enumerated in  these guidelines thus, we commit to update this document when it is deemed appropriate.

Physicians, Primary Care ; Prevalence ; Specialization ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Ambulatory Care ; Esophagitis ;

Gastroenterology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Consensus ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Survival Rate ; Incidence ; Philippines ; Colonic Polyps ; Adenoma