Caring for people with dementia is associated with multiple devastating social, financial, physical, and psychological challenges. There is strong evidence that multicomponent tailored caregiver intervention is effective in improving caregiver well-being and delaying institutionalization. In US, the government is actively funding for developing caregiver program and to prove its efficacy through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to translate into practice. Even with the introduction of Korean Long-term Care Plan, still, the most of the patients with dementia are being cared by the family members. The distress of caregiving is enormous, but structured therapeutic intervention program which efficacy is proven through RCT is very insufficient in Korea. The purpose of this article is to review the caregiver intervention programs of ongoing clinical trials comparing US and Korea, and to propose a tailored, therapeutic intervention program (I-CARE; A multicenter, randomized trial to assess efficacy of therapeutic intervention programs for decreasing caregiver burden in dementia caregiver) for hospital-care in Korea.
Caregivers* ; Dementia* ; Financial Management ; Humans ; Institutionalization ; Korea ; Long-Term Care

We would like to correct the grant information.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluating instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) is an important part of procedure to diagnose dementia. The Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) has been used extensively in Korea. However, its cut-off score has not been reformulated since 2002. The purpose of this study was to yield a new optimal cut-off score for the K-IADL and confirm the validity of this new cut-off score with various dementia groups. METHODS: We retrospectively collected a total of 2,347 patients' K-IADL data from 6 general hospitals in Korea. These patients had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia with various etiologies for cognitive impairment. We also recruited a normal control group (n=254) from the community. Korean-Mini Mental State Examination, Short version of the Geriatric Depression Scale, Clinical Dementia Rating, and Global Deterioration Scale were administered to all participants. Caregivers completed K-IADL and Barthel Index. RESULTS: K-IADL scores were significantly different among dementia subgroups, but not significantly different among MCI subgroups. Based on internal consistency, correlations with other scales, and factor analysis, K-IADL showed excellent reliability and validity. The new optimal cut-off score to diagnose dementia was 0.40, which gave a sensitivity of 0.901 and a specificity of 0.916. Positive predictive value for dementia using the new cut-off score was 94.2% for Alzheimer's disease, 100% for vascular dementia, and 84% for Parkinson's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results illustrate that the new K-IADL cut-off score of 0.40 is reliable and valid for screening impairments of daily functioning resulting from various etiologies.
Activities of Daily Living* ; Alzheimer Disease ; Caregivers ; Cognition Disorders ; Dementia ; Dementia, Vascular ; Depression ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Korea ; Mass Screening ; Mild Cognitive Impairment ; Parkinson Disease ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Weights and Measures

Background: and Purpose: In this study we aimed to find the association between neuropsychological performance and body mass index (BMI) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In addition, we investigated the effects of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype in the relationship between the BMI and cognition in MCI. Methods: We enrolled a cohort of 3,038 subjects with MCI aged 65–90 from the Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea and a dementia cohort of the Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital. MCI patients were classified into three subgroups according to the Asian standard of BMI. We compared cognitive performances between groups by one-way analysis of variance. To investigate the effects of the APOE genotype, we used multivariate linear regression models after adjusting for possible confounders. Results: Even though normal BMI groups were younger, had more females, and had less comorbidities, the higher BMI groups had better cognitive functions. Among subjects with APOE ε4 carriers, there was a positive relationship between the BMI and the memory task alone. Conclusions Our findings suggested that higher BMI in patients with MCI were associated with better cognitive performance. The effects of the APOE ε4 genotype in the associations between BMI and cognition were distinguishing. Therefore, according to physical status, APOE ε4 genotype-specific strategies in the assessments and treatments may be necessary in elderly patients with MCI.

Unfortunately, the original version of this article had errors in the data displayed in flow diagram.

At the request of the authors, the NRF-support number in ‘Acknowledgements’ is modified.