PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of compliance with the safety guidelines of anticancer drugs and identify the factors influencing compliance among general characteristics, knowledge of safety guidelines, self-efficacy, and workplace safety climate. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional descriptive design and 143 nurses who care for patients with cancer were surveyed. Data were collected from March 19 to March 31, 2018. RESULTS: The subjects' average age was 29.2±5.1 years, and oncology nursing experience was 5.07±4.01 years. Workplace safety climate, age, work site, and oncology nursing experience had a significant influence on nurses' compliance with the safety guidelines of anticancer drugs. The explained variance for compliance was 23.5%. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that the safety guidelines of anticancer drugs among nurses are expected to be better implemented by creating a safety-conscious environment. To maximize compliance nurses need to perform their tasks in an efficient manner, have institution-level active support, ready availability of personal protective equipment, appropriate education and a well-balanced workload.

Background: Even before coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), unexpected new infectious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, novel influenza A and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) affected the Korean healthcare systems. Nevertheless, during the COVID-19 period, we still experienced difficulties in systematic response. Especially in Ulsan Metropolitan City, which had no confirmed cases during the MERS, the response infrastructure was also very insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate in depth experiences of managers and practitioners of infectious disease management organizations with the COVID-19 response and identify areas for improvement in the response to future novel infectious diseases. Methods: We recruited participants through targeted and snowball sampling. Data were collected between March 27 and May 2, 2023, through in-depth interviews with 15 healthcare workers from Ulsan Metropolitan City, South Korea, including civil servants, physicians, nurses, and administrative staff, all of whom had experience with the COVID-19 response. Results: We extracted 1,496 semantic units, 16 subcategories, and 5 categories. The participants experienced confusion at being inserted into the infectious disease response without a thorough understanding of the work due to the sudden appearance of COVID-19.In the absence of precise manuals or designated consultancies, the participants’ confusion was exacerbated by frequent changes to guidelines and insufficient communication, and they felt despair by others’ passive attitudes, which contradicted their own feelings. They also felt bewildered that they were not supported by policy, despite having chosen to support a great cause in an emergency. Excessive workloads led to health problems. Nevertheless, the participants actively sought help, received support, made efforts to construct the response environment, and felt a sense of reward when they witnessed the results. The participants emphasized the need to build up the inadequate public healthcare system in Ulsan to prepare for future novel infectious diseases, to maintain a trained, professional workforce, and to secure a sufficient budget to provide support and compensation. Conclusion The findings indicate that local governments need to establish public healthcare systems and secure professionals for responding to novel infectious diseases.

Background: Even before coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), unexpected new infectious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, novel influenza A and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) affected the Korean healthcare systems. Nevertheless, during the COVID-19 period, we still experienced difficulties in systematic response. Especially in Ulsan Metropolitan City, which had no confirmed cases during the MERS, the response infrastructure was also very insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate in depth experiences of managers and practitioners of infectious disease management organizations with the COVID-19 response and identify areas for improvement in the response to future novel infectious diseases. Methods: We recruited participants through targeted and snowball sampling. Data were collected between March 27 and May 2, 2023, through in-depth interviews with 15 healthcare workers from Ulsan Metropolitan City, South Korea, including civil servants, physicians, nurses, and administrative staff, all of whom had experience with the COVID-19 response. Results: We extracted 1,496 semantic units, 16 subcategories, and 5 categories. The participants experienced confusion at being inserted into the infectious disease response without a thorough understanding of the work due to the sudden appearance of COVID-19.In the absence of precise manuals or designated consultancies, the participants’ confusion was exacerbated by frequent changes to guidelines and insufficient communication, and they felt despair by others’ passive attitudes, which contradicted their own feelings. They also felt bewildered that they were not supported by policy, despite having chosen to support a great cause in an emergency. Excessive workloads led to health problems. Nevertheless, the participants actively sought help, received support, made efforts to construct the response environment, and felt a sense of reward when they witnessed the results. The participants emphasized the need to build up the inadequate public healthcare system in Ulsan to prepare for future novel infectious diseases, to maintain a trained, professional workforce, and to secure a sufficient budget to provide support and compensation. Conclusion The findings indicate that local governments need to establish public healthcare systems and secure professionals for responding to novel infectious diseases.

Background: Even before coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), unexpected new infectious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, novel influenza A and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) affected the Korean healthcare systems. Nevertheless, during the COVID-19 period, we still experienced difficulties in systematic response. Especially in Ulsan Metropolitan City, which had no confirmed cases during the MERS, the response infrastructure was also very insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate in depth experiences of managers and practitioners of infectious disease management organizations with the COVID-19 response and identify areas for improvement in the response to future novel infectious diseases. Methods: We recruited participants through targeted and snowball sampling. Data were collected between March 27 and May 2, 2023, through in-depth interviews with 15 healthcare workers from Ulsan Metropolitan City, South Korea, including civil servants, physicians, nurses, and administrative staff, all of whom had experience with the COVID-19 response. Results: We extracted 1,496 semantic units, 16 subcategories, and 5 categories. The participants experienced confusion at being inserted into the infectious disease response without a thorough understanding of the work due to the sudden appearance of COVID-19.In the absence of precise manuals or designated consultancies, the participants’ confusion was exacerbated by frequent changes to guidelines and insufficient communication, and they felt despair by others’ passive attitudes, which contradicted their own feelings. They also felt bewildered that they were not supported by policy, despite having chosen to support a great cause in an emergency. Excessive workloads led to health problems. Nevertheless, the participants actively sought help, received support, made efforts to construct the response environment, and felt a sense of reward when they witnessed the results. The participants emphasized the need to build up the inadequate public healthcare system in Ulsan to prepare for future novel infectious diseases, to maintain a trained, professional workforce, and to secure a sufficient budget to provide support and compensation. Conclusion The findings indicate that local governments need to establish public healthcare systems and secure professionals for responding to novel infectious diseases.

Background: Even before coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), unexpected new infectious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, novel influenza A and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) affected the Korean healthcare systems. Nevertheless, during the COVID-19 period, we still experienced difficulties in systematic response. Especially in Ulsan Metropolitan City, which had no confirmed cases during the MERS, the response infrastructure was also very insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate in depth experiences of managers and practitioners of infectious disease management organizations with the COVID-19 response and identify areas for improvement in the response to future novel infectious diseases. Methods: We recruited participants through targeted and snowball sampling. Data were collected between March 27 and May 2, 2023, through in-depth interviews with 15 healthcare workers from Ulsan Metropolitan City, South Korea, including civil servants, physicians, nurses, and administrative staff, all of whom had experience with the COVID-19 response. Results: We extracted 1,496 semantic units, 16 subcategories, and 5 categories. The participants experienced confusion at being inserted into the infectious disease response without a thorough understanding of the work due to the sudden appearance of COVID-19.In the absence of precise manuals or designated consultancies, the participants’ confusion was exacerbated by frequent changes to guidelines and insufficient communication, and they felt despair by others’ passive attitudes, which contradicted their own feelings. They also felt bewildered that they were not supported by policy, despite having chosen to support a great cause in an emergency. Excessive workloads led to health problems. Nevertheless, the participants actively sought help, received support, made efforts to construct the response environment, and felt a sense of reward when they witnessed the results. The participants emphasized the need to build up the inadequate public healthcare system in Ulsan to prepare for future novel infectious diseases, to maintain a trained, professional workforce, and to secure a sufficient budget to provide support and compensation. Conclusion The findings indicate that local governments need to establish public healthcare systems and secure professionals for responding to novel infectious diseases.

Purpose: This study examines the weight control behavior depending on university students’ motives of using social media. Methods: The participants were 447 university students in the Jeonbuk area. Collected data were analyzed using factor analysis, cluster analysis, analysis of variance, and χ 2 tests with SPSS v. 26.0. Considering the motives of using social media, we investigated the usage of social media, dietary behavior related to social media, and weight control behavior. Results: Using the K-clustering method, the motives to use social media were categorized into three clusters: cluster 1 was the interest-centered group, cluster 2 was the multipurpose information-seeking group, and cluster 3 was the relationship-centered group. Among the various social media sites, YouTube (86.8%), Instagram (76.1%), and Facebook (61.1%) were the most visited by the subjects. The dietary behavior related to social media in cluster 2 was significantly higher than clusters 1 and 3 (p < 0.001). Clusters 1 and 2 showed a significantly higher dissatisfaction with one’s weight (p < 0.05) and consequent interest in weight control than cluster 3 (p < 0.001). Cluster 2 used weight control-related information from social media significantly more than other clusters (p < 0.05). Weight control experiences in cluster 1 and 2 were significantly higher than in cluster 3 (p < 0.001). Conclusion Differences in dietary behavior related to social media and weight control behavior were observed between cluster types of motivation to use social media. Based on the usage motives of university students and their behaviors, we propose that educational programs should be conducted for weight control using social media.

PURPOSE: In 2008, the Korean Oncology Nursing Society (KONS) published standards for the safe use of chemotherapy in clinical settings, including extravastion management. Although the medical environment has rapidly changed, KONS standards have not been revised since then. In 2017, the KONS planned to revise the practice guidelines on oral chemotherapy METHODS: A clinical expert group developed recommended guidelines, using officially accepted standards based on all relevant publications. The draft was discussed and accepted in a consensus conference. The final recommendations were reviewed and approved by the KONS Boards of Directors. RESULTS: There were 4 chapters and 50 recommendations in the final version of the guidelines. Recommendations include those associated with general practice, patient consent and education, order assessment and administration, and side effects and complication management. CONCLUSION: The revised KONS guidelines on oral chemotherapy will contribute to the improvement of staff and patient safety related to oral chemotherapy. KONS guidelines revisions should be carried out at regular intervals.
Consensus ; Drug Therapy* ; Education ; General Practice ; Humans ; Oncology Nursing* ; Patient Safety ; Personal Protective Equipment ; Safety Management

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) and conventional radiography in detecting osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) using computed tomography (CT), as the reference standard and evaluate the diagnostic reproducibility of DTS. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients (24 male and 21 female; age range, 25–77 years) with clinically suspected ONFH underwent anteroposterior radiography, DTS, and CT. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated the presence and type of ONFH. The diagnostic performance of radiography and DTS in detecting the presence of ONFH and determining the types of ONFH were evaluated. The interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of each imaging modality were analyzed using Cohen’s kappa. Results: DTS had higher sensitivity (89.4%–100% vs. 74.5%–76.6%) and specificity (97.3%–100% vs. 78.4%–83.8%) for ONFH detection than radiography. DTS showed higher performance than radiography in identifying the subtypes of ONFH with statistical significance in one reader (type 1, 100% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.004; type II, 97.1% vs. 73.5%, p = 0.008). The interobserver agreement was excellent for DTS and moderate for radiography (kappa of 0.86 vs. 0.57, respectively). The intraobserver agreement for DTS was higher than that of radiography (kappa of 0.96 vs. 0.69, respectively). Conclusion DTS showed higher diagnostic performance and reproducibility than radiography in detecting ONFH. DTS may be used as a first-line diagnostic modality instead of radiography for patients suspected of having ONFH.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the impact of gestational age (GA) cut-off on the clinical outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and assess whether prematurity influences the predictive value of fetal lung volume measurement. Methods: We investigated the medical records of infants with CDH between January 2014 and August 2021. We classified the patients into term CDH (TCDH) and preterm CDH (PCDH) groups and compared their clinical characteristics, including fetal lung volume measured by the observed-toexpected lung-to-head ratio (O/E LHR). Results: Among 145 infants with CDH, 23 (15.9%) were preterm. Mean O/E LHR was significantly higher in survivors than in non-survivors with no difference between TCDH and PCDH groups.Mortality rate was significantly higher in infants with GA <34 weeks (80%) than in late preterm infants (16.7%). O/E LHR, rather than GA <34 weeks, was a risk factor predicting mortality in multivariate analyses. Predictive power of O/E LHR was high in the TCDH and PCDH groups, respectively. The incidence of chronic lung disease did not differ between PCDH and TCDH. Conclusion O/E LHR significantly predicted mortality in preterm infants, suggesting preterm birth alone should not be the determinant of early CDH treatment strategy.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the impact of gestational age (GA) cut-off on the clinical outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and assess whether prematurity influences the predictive value of fetal lung volume measurement. Methods: We investigated the medical records of infants with CDH between January 2014 and August 2021. We classified the patients into term CDH (TCDH) and preterm CDH (PCDH) groups and compared their clinical characteristics, including fetal lung volume measured by the observed-toexpected lung-to-head ratio (O/E LHR). Results: Among 145 infants with CDH, 23 (15.9%) were preterm. Mean O/E LHR was significantly higher in survivors than in non-survivors with no difference between TCDH and PCDH groups.Mortality rate was significantly higher in infants with GA <34 weeks (80%) than in late preterm infants (16.7%). O/E LHR, rather than GA <34 weeks, was a risk factor predicting mortality in multivariate analyses. Predictive power of O/E LHR was high in the TCDH and PCDH groups, respectively. The incidence of chronic lung disease did not differ between PCDH and TCDH. Conclusion O/E LHR significantly predicted mortality in preterm infants, suggesting preterm birth alone should not be the determinant of early CDH treatment strategy.