Purpose: The purpose of this longitudinal study was to identify the relationship between the readiness for hospital discharge and self-care changes in an early stage of liver transplantation after discharge. Methods: Data of 75 liver transplant recipients within one year of surgery from a transplantation center from May 2019 to May 2020 were collected for this study. Their readiness for discharge was measured before discharge. Self-care after liver transplantation was evaluated at one week, one month, and three months of discharge at outpatient visits. Linear mixed model was used to evaluate the statistical relationship. Results: The readiness for hospital discharge was significantly higher when the caregiver was a spouse (p = .027), with fewer post-transplantation days (p = .027), absence of acute rejection (p = .004), or high self-efficacy (p < .001). As a result of the linear mixed model analysis, the higher the discharge readiness score, the higher the self-care score (β = 0.29, p < .001). However, after three months, their self-care had decreased regardless of their level of readiness for hospital discharge compared to one week after discharge. Conclusion Improving the readiness before discharge is essential to enhance self-care. Also, active intervention at 3 months of discharge should be performed to check and promote their long-term self-care.

Although gastroesophageal damage is commonly induced by accidental drinking of a strong acid or alkali, damage due to the consumption of a vinegar beverage is not well known. We report a case of corrosive esophageal ulcer found in an adolescent consuming a vinegar drink daily. A 15-year-old male visited the emergency room presenting with hematemesis and severe epigastric pain. Multiple longitudinal ulcers, concurrent mucosal hemorrhage, and denuded mucosa were noted in the whole of the esophagus via an endoscopic examination. He had been drinking a vinegar beverage daily without sufficient dilution. The patient was treated with corticosteroid, antibiotic therapy, and mucosa protecting alginate medication and was asked to fast for a week. The follow-up endoscopy showed improvement of the esophageal injuries. Overall, continuous consumption of a vinegar beverage can result in acidic burns and destruction of the surface of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, vinegar beverages should be considered as corrosive agents.

Most solitary gastrointestinal (GI) polyps in children are either inflammatory or hamartomatous. Solitary hyperplastic polyp, sentinel polyp and solitary adenomatous polyp have been occasionally diagnosed in adults, but very rarely reported in Korean children. We recently came across a case with adenomatous polyp in the colon, a case with hyperplastic polyp beneath the gastroesophageal junction, a case with hyperplastic polyp in the prepyloric area, and a case with sentinel polyp in the distal esophagus, which are unusual pathologic types in children. These mucosal lesions were diagnosed incidentally during elective endoscopic examinations for GI symptoms. Most polyps do not cause significant symptoms, so the diagnosis might be delayed, especially in children, in whom GI endoscopy is not commonly performed for screening purpose as in the adults.
Adenomatous Polyps ; Adult ; Child* ; Colon ; Diagnosis ; Endoscopy ; Esophagogastric Junction ; Esophagus ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Polyps*

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

No abstract available.
Gastroschisis*

Objective: To analyze the characteristics and trends of scientific publications on thyroid ultrasound (US) from 2001 to 2020, specifically examining the differences among disciplines. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched for scientific articles on thyroid US published between 2001 and 2020 using the PubMed online service. The evaluated parameters included year of publication, type of document, topic, funding, first author’s specialty, journal name, subject category, impact factor, and quartile ranking of the publishing journal, country, and language. Relationships between the first author’s specialty (radiology, internal medicine, surgery, otorhinolaryngology, and miscellaneous) and other parameters were analyzed. Results: A total of 2917 thyroid US publications were published between 2001 and 2020, which followed an exponential growth pattern, with an annual growth rate of 11.6%. Radiology produced the most publications (n = 1290, 44.2%), followed by internal medicine (n = 716, 24.5%), surgery (n = 409, 14.0%), and otorhinolaryngology (n = 171, 5.9%). Otorhinolaryngology and internal medicine published significantly more case reports than radiology (p < 0.001, each). Radiology published a significantly higher proportion of publications on imaging diagnosis (p < 0.001 for all) and a significantly lower proportion of publications on biopsy (p < 0.001 for all) than the other disciplines. Publications produced by radiology authors were less frequently published in Q1 journals than those from other disciplines (p < 0.005 for internal medicine and miscellaneous disciplines and < 0.01 for surgery and otorhinolaryngology). China contributed the greatest number of publications (n = 622, 21.3%), followed by South Korea (n = 478, 16.4%) and the United States (n = 468, 16.0%). Conclusion Radiology produced the most publications for thyroid US than any other discipline. Radiology authors published more notably on imaging diagnosis compared to other topics and in journals with lower impact factors compared to authors in other disciplines.