1.Application of Hoffmann II metal external fixation in treatment of open tibiofibular fracture
Jisheng DONG ; Xing FANG ; Binyong YAN ; Lijun DONG
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery 2014;(6):594-595,596
Objective To observe the effect and complications of Hoffmann Ⅱ metal external fixator in the treatment of open fractures of tibia and fibula. Methods 40 patients with open fractures of fibula received fracture reduction and fixation with HoffmannⅡmetal exter-nal fixing frame by C arm X-ray machine,who were followed up for 12 months,and the efficacy and the incidence rate were observed. Results Among the 40 cases,27 cases (67. 5%) were recovered,11 cases(27. 5%) were delayed healing,2 cases(5%) did not heal. 11 cases (27. 5%) with the pin loosening,8 cases (20%) with pin tract infection,7 cases (17. 5%) with the pin tract aseptic,1 cases (2. 5%) with infection of bone,1 cases (2. 5%) with knee flexion and extension slight abnormality. Conclusion Hoffmann Ⅱ metal external fixator in the treatment of open fractures of tibia and fibula has certain advantages,and the curative effect is exact,but there are still complications,we should pay attention to prevention to avoid adverse consequences.
2.Intervertebral fusion cage combined with pedicle screw systems for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis:evaluation of the intervertebral space height
Dong MI ; Mingkun YANG ; Xu ZHANG ; Jisheng WU ; Chuan LIU ; Zhou LI ; Jie WANG
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2014;(44):7122-7126
BACKGROUND:The main treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis is the surgery, in a broader attempt to decompression, reduction, fixation and fusion of the lesioned segments. The golden standard of the treatment is biological fusion, while internal fixation is a reliable assistance for fusion therapy. <br> OBJECTIVE:To discuss the clinical value and curative effect of intervertebral fusion cage combined with pedicle screw systems for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. <br> METHODS:From March 2010 to March 2013, 21 cases of isthmic spondylolisthesis were treated with intervertebral fusion cage combined with pedicle screw systems, including 18 cases of spondylolisthesis of degree II and 3 cases of spondylolisthesis of degree III. Al patients were fol owed up regularly, taking JOA lumbago score and visual analog scale score as the objective evaluation criteria of pain in postoperative fol ow-ups. The curative effect was assessed by Macrab standard, and the functional recovery was evaluated based on indicators such as Prolo, and the spinal fusion rate was assessed according to Lenke criteria. Changes of slippage rate, slippage angle, sacral inclination angle and intervertebral space post height in preoperative and postoperative periods were evaluated by iconography data. <br> RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Al the 21 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis were fol owed up for 12-16 months. JOA lumbago score and vasual analog scale score of al patients were improved after treatment, and the difference was statistical y significant compared with before treatment (P=0.000). According to Macrab evaluation criteria, there were 17 excellent cases and 4 good cases. Each indicator evaluated by preoperative Prolo activities and symptom grading showed significant differences in preoperative and postoperative periods (P=0.003). Postoperative lumbar spondylolisthesis was basical y reset, the slippage angle was significantly reduced, the sacral inclination angle was increased, and the height of the intervertebral space was recovered basical y. Intervertebral fusion cage combined with pedicle screw systems was one of the effective strategies to treat lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.
3.Meta-analysis of efficacy ,safety and immunogenicity of bevacizumab biosimilars and original drugs for patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Haitao CHEN ; Nsen Se YANG ; Hang Weis DENG ; Changyuan YANG ; Jisheng CHEN
China Pharmacy 2022;33(8):1003-1008
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy ,safety and immunogenicity of bevacizumab biosimilars and original drugs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC),and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical use. METHODS PubMed,Embase, Web of Science ,Cochrane Library ,CBM,CNKI,VIP,Wanfang database ,ClinicalTrials.gov,and Clinical Trial Center of China were searched from the establishment of the database to September 25,2021,randomized controlled trials (RCTs)about bevacizumab biosimilars(trial group )versus bevacizumab original drugs (control group )for NSCLC were collected. After literature screening , data extraction and quality evaluation of included RCTs with bias risk assessment tool recommended by Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0, meta-analysis,sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis were performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS A total of 11 RCTs were included ,involving 6 596 patients in total. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significance in the difference of overall response rate [RR=0.97,95%CI(0.92,1.02),P=0.22],the total incidence of adverse reaction [RR=1.00, 95%CI(0.99,1.01),P=0.79],the incidence of severe adverse reaction [RR=1.04,95%CI(0.96,1.13),P=0.38],positive rate of anti-drug antibody [RR =1.10,95%CI(0.88,1.36,P=0.41] and the incidence of common adverse reactions (except for vomiting)among 2 groups(P>0.05). The sensitivity analysis results showed that the obtained results were robust. The results of publication bias analysis showed that there was little possibility of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy ,safety and immunogenicity of bevacizumab biosimilars used for NSCLC are equivalent to those of bevacizumab original drugs.