Objective To investigate the spreading characteristics of plasmid-mediated resistance and the clones dissemination in multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.Methods A total of 53 strains of multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae were successively collected from the First Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine during December 2009 and February 2012.Antimicrobial agents susceptibility was determined by Kirby-Bauer (K-B) method,and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to investigate the clonality of clinical isolates.Filter mating method was used for plasmid conjugation,and the relative molecular mass of the plasmid was determined using S1-PFGE assay.PCR amplification and sequencing were used to screen common antimicrobial resistance genes.Results Fiftythree clinical isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were all resistant to penicillins,and their sensitive rates to piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/sulbactam were below 15％.More than 86％ strains were resistant to cephalosporins,and 60％-70％ strains were resistant to quinolones,sulfonamides and tetracyclines.About 50％ strains were resistant or intermediate sensitive to carbapenems.PFGE results did not support the evidence of clone dissemination.Resistant isolates harbored conjugant plasmid with 34 000-355 000 bp size,which encoded penicillins,cephalosporins,carbapenems or aminoglycoside resistant determinants,including CTX-M,TEM,KPC type β-1actamase genes and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene qnr.Conclusions Multidrug resistance is prevalent in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.Rapid prevalence of resistance is mainly determined by conjugant plasmid horizontal transfer rather than simple clone dissemination.

Objective:To predict and evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of linezolid, teicoplanin and daptomycin against Staphylococci bloodstream infections with Monte Carlo simulation, and to optimize the clinical administration program. Methods:A total of 1 847 Staphylococci strains isolated from blood samples between January 2018 to December 2019 were collected with the help of the Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of linezolid and daptomycin were detected by broth dilution method, while MIC of teicoplanin were detected by agar dilution method. The dosage regimens of linezolid were 800 mg once daily, 500 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours and 600 mg once every eight hours. The dosage regimens of teicoplanin were 400 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours, 800 mg once every 12 hours, and 1 000 mg once every 12 hours. The dosage regimens of daptomycin were 4 mg·kg -1·d -1, 6 mg·kg -1·d -1, 8 mg·kg -1·d -1, 10 mg·kg -1·d -1and 12 mg·kg -1·d -1. The probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of three different dosage regimens were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. A dosage regimen with CFR≥90.0% was a reasonable choice for empirical antimicrobial therapy. Results:PTA of linezolid against Staphylococci when MIC≤0.500 mg/L at four dosage regimens (800 mg once daily, 500 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours and 600 mg once every eight hours) were all over 90.0%. When MIC was 1.000 mg/L, the PTA of linezolid against Staphylococci under the dosages of 500 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours and 600 mg once every eight hours were 92.2%, 96.6% and 97.6%, respectively. The CFR of the four dosage regimens of linezolid were 73.9%, 83.7%, 90.8% and 95.3%, respectively. When MIC≤1.000 mg/L, PTA of teicoplanin against Staphylococci were all 100.0% at four dosage regimens (400 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours, 800 mg once every 12 hours and 1 000 mg once every 12 hours). When MIC was 2.000 mg/L, the PTA of teicoplanin (800 mg once every 12 hours and 1 000 mg once every 12 hours) against Staphylococci were both 100.0%. The CFR of the four dosage regimens of teicoplanin were 90.8%, 92.8%, 93.5% and 94.6%, respectively. When MIC≤0.500 mg/L, PTA of daptomycin against Staphylococci under the five dosages of 4 mg·kg -1·d -1, 6 mg·kg -1·d -1, 8 mg·kg -1·d -1, 10 mg·kg -1·d -1 and 12 mg·kg -1·d -1 were all over 90.0%. When MIC was 1.000 mg/L, the PTA of daptomycin against Staphylococci under the three dosages of 8 mg·kg -1·d -1, 10 mg·kg -1·d -1 and 12 mg·kg -1·d -1were 96.9%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively. The CFR of the five dosage regimens of daptomycin against Staphylococci were 97.4%, 99.2%, 99.9%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively. Conclusions:Linezolid (600 mg once every 12 hours), teicoplanin (400 mg once every 12 hours) and daptomycin (4 mg·kg -1·d -1) can achieve satisfactory antibacterial activity for Staphylococci bloodstream infections.

Objective:To evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of ceftobiprole, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus (SAU) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) bloodstream infections, which can provide a reference for clinical medication. Methods:A total of 1 777 strains of staphylococci were isolated from blood culture of 51 hospitals within the Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) from January to December in 2021. The dilution method was used to assess the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ceftobiprole, vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin on staphylococci. Additionally, the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of these medications in varied dosage regimens were predicted using Monte Carlo simulation.Results:Ceftobiprole demonstrated significant antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA), the MIC 50 and MIC 90 were 0.500 and 1.000 mg/L, respectively, and the MIC range was ≤0.060 to 4.000 mg/L.Meanwhile, the ceftobiprole-resistance rate of SAU was 0.1%(1/1 073), but the resistance rate of CNS was 7.7%(54/704). There was no evidence of staphylococcal resistance to daptomycin or vancomycin. Against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), no resistance to the four drugs was observed. Monte Carlo simulation showed that standard drug regimens of ceftobiprole (500 mg once every eight hours) and daptomycin (6 mg·kg -1·d -1) achieved high PTA and CFR against staphylococcus.The current vancomycin and linezolid standard treatment for staphylococcal bloodstream infections had a low CFR. When vancomycin 1 000 mg once every eight hours was used, the CFRs of MRSA and MSSA were both≥90.0%, while the CFR of CNS was still less than 80.0%. CFR of linezolid against staphylococcus was ≥90.0% under the dosages of 600 mg once every eight hours. Conclusions:Ceftobiprole, vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin all show strong antibacterial activity against staphylococcus.Ceftobiprole and daptomycin standard treatment represent adequate antibacterial efficacy against staphylococcal bloodstream infections. Furthermore, appropriate increase of the dosages of vancomycin and linezolid based on the MIC value and species of bacteria is necessary.

Objective:To identify the impact of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on neurological outcome and survival in adults with cardiac arrest (CA).Methods:Totally 31 adult patients with ECPR were enrolled from March 2015 to June 2019 in Emergency Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nangjing Medical University (Jiangsu People Hospital). Patients were divided to the survival group ( n=12) and death group ( n=19). Duration of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and other mechanical support were compared between groups. Cerebral performance category (CPC) and hospital survival were also evaluated according to the duration of CCPR before ECPR. Results:The duration of CCPR before ECPR was significantly shorter in the survival group than that in the death group ( P=0.002). Duration of ECMO had no significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.478). The location of CA occurrence had no impact on the hospital survival rate ( P=0.716). ECPR in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) also had no impact on the hospital survival rate ( P=0.174), and patients received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) had higher hospital survival than patients without CRRT ( P = 0.032). Patients with CCPR duration ≤ 60 min had higher rates of ROSC and hospital survival ( P <0.001). CPC evaluation showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusions:ECMO can provide effective life support to CA patients, and improve their survival rates. It is recommended to initiation of ECMO implantation within 60 min after CCPR.

Objective:To compare the antibacterial activity of domestic and branded tigecycline with in vitro pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) model. Methods:The in vitro PK automatic simulation system PASS400 was used to simulate different doses of tigecycline administration regimen (100 mg, 1 time/d; 50 mg, 12 h/d; 100 mg, 12 h/d), and to observe domestic and imported tigecycline time sterilization curve and related pharmacodynamic parameters of the drug against the standard strain of Escherichia coli (ATCC25922), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC BAA-1706) and the clinical strain of Acinetobacter baumannii (AB-16703). The GraphPad Prism 7 statistical software was used to analyze the data. Results:Under the condition of simulating different doses of PK, domestic and original tigecycline had similar antibacterial effects, but both showed weak antibacterial effects. The time sterilization curves of the two were almost overlapped, and the maximum sterilization amount was less than 2 log. Within 24 h, the bacteria all recovered to the growth plateau. In the comparison of PD parameters, the original and domestic tigecycline (100 mg, 1 time/12 h) had the maximum bactericidal doses of (-1.101±0.147) lg CFU/mL and (-1.105±0.208) lg CFU/mL for Escherichia coli ATCC25922; the maximum bactericidal capacity for Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1706 was (-1.999±0.187) lg CFU/mL and (-1.865±0.066) lg CFU/mL; the maximum bactericidal capacity for Acinetobacter baumannii AB-16703 was (-0.240±0.209) lg CFU/mL and (-0.230±0.187) lg CFU/mL. Under different dosage regimens, the maximum sterilization amount against the three bacteria, the time required for the bacteria to regenerate to the initial amount, the 24 h bacterial reduction, and the difference between the area of the sterilization and recovery growth curve and the blank control curve were all not statistical significant between the two drugs ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Tigecycline cannot show good antibacterial activity under the conditions of simulating human drug metabolism in vitro. The original branded tigecycline and domestic tigecycline have similar in vitro PK/PD effects.

Objective To analyze the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture in China.Methods Clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture from participating hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistance Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) during January 2014 to December 2015 were collected.Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted with agar dilution or broth dilution methods as recommended by US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI)2018.The data were analyzed with Whonet 5.6 software.Results During the study period,4 801 clinical bacterial isolates were collected from 26 hospitals,of which 1 798 (37.5％) were Gram-positive bacteria and 3 003 (62.5％) were gram-negative bacteria.The top 10 isolates were Escherichia coli (33.8％),coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (19.0％),Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.9％),Staphylococcus aureus (10.1％),Acinetobacter baumannii (4.0％),Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.8％),Streptococcus (3.0％),Enterobacter sulcus (2.9％),Enterococcus faecium (2.8％) and Enterococcus faecalis (1.8％).Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillinresistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCNS) accounted for 33.9％ (165/487) and 56.9％ (520/913) of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus respectively.No vancomycinresistant Staphylococcus was detected.The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin was 0.7％ (1/135),and no vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecaliss was detected.The positive rates of extendedspectrum β-1actamases(ESBLs)-producing Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus were 56.9％ (923/1 621),30.1％ (172/572) and 29.2％ (7/24),respectively.The positive rates of carbapenemresistant Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae,Enterobacter,Salmonella and Citrobacter were 1.2％ (20/1 621),7.2％ (41/572),4.3％ (6/141),1.5％ (1/67) and 2.9％ (1/34),respectively.The resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to polymyxin and tegacycline were 2.6％ (5/190) and 8.9％ (17/190)respectively,and that of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to polymyxin and fosfomycin were 1.1％ (2/183)and 0.6％ (1/183),respectively.Conclusions The surveillance results from 2014 to 2015 show that the main pathogens of blood stream infection in China are Gram-negative bacteria,while Escherichia coli is the most common pathogen,the detection rate of MRSA is lower than other surveillance data in the same period in China;carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli are at a low level as shown in this surveillance.

Objective:To investigate the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacteria isolated from blood culture in China.Methods:The clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture from member hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) were collected during January 2016 to December 2017. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted by agar dilution or broth dilution methods recommended by US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2019. WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze data.Results:During the study period, 8 154 bacterial strains were collected from 33 hospitals, of which 2 325 (28.5%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 5 829 (71.5%) were Gram-negative bacteria. The top 10 bacterial species were Escherichia coli (34.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (11.3%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (7.4%), Acinetobacter baumannii (4.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.9%), Enterococcus faecium (3.8%), Streptococci (2.9%), Enterobacter cloacae (2.7%) and Enterococcus faecalis (2.5%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCNS) accounted for 34.2%(315/922) and 77.7%(470/605), respectively. No vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus was detected. The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin was 0.6%(2/312), and no vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was detected. The ESBLs-producing rates in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus were 55.7%(1 576/2 831), 29.9%(386/1 289) and 38.5%(15/39), respectively. The incidences of carbapenem-resistance in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae were 1.2%(33/2 831), 17.5%(226/1 289), respectively. The resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to polymyxin and tigecycline were 14.8%(55/372) and 5.9%(22/372) respectively, and those of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to polymyxin and carbapenem were 1.3%(4/315) and 18.7%(59/315), respectively. Conclusion:The surveillance results from 2016 to 2017 showed that the main pathogens of blood stream infection in China were gram-negative bacteria, while Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen; the MRSA incidence was lower than other surveillance data in the same period in China; carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli was at a low level during this surveillance, while carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is on the rise.

Objective:To investigate the bacterial composition and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical isolates from bloodstream infections in China.Methods:The clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture were collected during January 2020 to December 2020 in member hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS). Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted by agar dilution or broth dilution methods recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI, USA). WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze data.Results:During the study period, 10 043 bacterial strains were collected from 54 hospitals, of which 2 664 (26.5%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 7 379 (73.5%) were Gram-negative bacteria. The top 10 bacterial species were Escherichia coli (38.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (9.9%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (7.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.9%), Enterococcus faecium (3.3%), Enterobacter cloacae (2.8%), Enterococcus faecalis (2.6%), Acinetobacter baumannii (2.4%) and Klebsiella spp (1.8%). The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus were 27.6% and 74.4%, respectively. No glycopeptide- and daptomycin-resistant Staphylococci were detected. More than 95% of Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive to rifampicin and SMZco. No vancomycin-resistant Enterococci strains were detected. Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis were 48.4%, 23.6% and 36.1%, respectively. The prevalence rates of carbapenem-resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were 2.3% and 16.1%, respectively; 9.6% of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam combination. The prevalence rate of carbapenem-resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii was 60.0%, while polymyxin and tigecycline showed good activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. The prevalence rate of carbapenem-resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 23.2%. Conclusions:The surveillance results in 2020 showed that the main pathogens of bloodstream infection in China were gram-negative bacteria, while Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen, and ESBL-producing strains declined while carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae kept on high level. The proportion and the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa were on the rise slowly. On the other side, the MRSA incidence got lower in China, while the overall prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci was low.

Objective:To investigate the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacteria isolated from blood culture in China.Methods:The clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture from member hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) were collected during January 2018 to December 2019. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted with agar dilution or broth dilution methods recommended by US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze data.Results:During the study period, 14 778 bacterial strains were collected from 50 hospitals, of which 4 117 (27.9%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 10 661(72.1%) were Gram-negative bacteria. The top 10 bacterial species were Escherichia coli (37.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (9.7%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (8.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.7%), Enterococcus faecium (3.4%), Acinetobacter baumannii(3.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (2.9%), Streptococci(2.8%) and Enterococcus faecalis (2.3%). The the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus were 27.4% (394/1 438) and 70.4% (905/1 285), respectively. No glycopeptide-resistant Staphylococcus was detected. More than 95% of S. aureus were sensitive to amikacin, rifampicin and SMZco. The resistance rate of E. faecium to vancomycin was 0.4% (2/504), and no vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis was detected. The ESBLs-producing rates in no carbapenem-resistance E. coli, carbapenem sensitive K. pneumoniae and Proteus were 50.4% (2 731/5 415), 24.6% (493/2001) and 35.2% (31/88), respectively. The prevalence of carbapenem-resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae were 1.5% (85/5 500), 20.6% (518/2 519), respectively. 8.3% (27/325) of carbapenem-resistance K. pneumoniae was resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam combination. The resistance rates of A. baumannii to polymyxin and tigecycline were 2.8% (14/501) and 3.4% (17/501) respectively, and that of P. aeruginosa to carbapenem were 18.9% (103/546). Conclusions:The surveillance results from 2018 to 2019 showed that the main pathogens of bloodstream infection in China were gram-negative bacteria, while E. coli was the most common pathogen, and ESBLs-producing strains were in majority; the MRSA incidence is getting lower in China; carbapenem-resistant E. coli keeps at a low level, while carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae is on the rise obviously.

Objective:To report the results of national surveillance on the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacterial isolates from bloodstream infections in China in 2021.Methods:The clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture from member hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) were collected during January 2021 to December 2021. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted by agar dilution or broth dilution methods recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze data.Results:During the study period, 11 013 bacterial strains were collected from 51 hospitals, of which 2 782 (25.3%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 8 231 (74.7%) were Gram-negative bacteria. The top 10 bacterial species were Escherichia coli (37.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (9.8%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (6.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.6%), Enterococcus faecium (3.6%), Acinetobacter baumannii (2.8%), Enterococcus faecalis (2.7%), Enterobacter cloacae (2.5%) and Klebsiella spp (2.1%). The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus were 25.3% and 76.8%, respectively. No glycopeptide- and daptomycin-resistant Staphylococci was detected; more than 95.0% of Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive to ceftobiprole. No vancomycin-resistant Enterococci strains were detected. The rates of extended spectrum B-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolated in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis were 49.6%, 25.5% and 39.0%, respectively. The prevalence rates of carbapenem-resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were 2.2% and 15.8%, respectively; 7.9% of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae was resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam combination. Ceftobiprole demonstrated excellent activity against non-ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Aztreonam/avibactam was highly active against carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The prevalence rate of carbapenem-resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii was 60.0%, while polymyxin and tigecycline showed good activity against Acinetobacter baumannii (5.5% and 4.5%). The prevalence of carbapenem-resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 18.9%. Conclusions:The BRICS surveillance results in 2021 shows that the main pathogens of blood stream infection in China are gram-negative bacteria, in which Escherichia coli is the most common. The MRSA incidence shows a further decreasing trend in China and the overall prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci is low. The prevalence of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is still on a high level, but the trend is downwards.