Despite the significant progress and advancement in contemporary medical education in China, it still fails to fully address the needs of developing medical disciplines and nurturing medical talents in the country. There are several shortcomings in the medical education in the representative discipline of neurology. Medical education research in China often covers disparate topics, lacks systematic foundation and theoretical innovation, predominantly emphasizes single-center clinical teaching, and rarely results in the publication of high-impact, internationally recognized research manuscripts. In addition, there remains a significant gap in the level of basic neurology research between China and abroad. As the "Healthy China" plan drives the need for enhanced medical education, coupled with global technological advancements and evolving health needs and medical practice, new theoretical shifts in medical education are emerging. Strategic planning in neurology, interdisciplinary advancements in neuroscience, and the integration of information technology have created substantial opportunities for the development of neurology medical education. However, this pivotal moment has posed new challenges to research in neurology medical education, including transitioning from practical research to innovative theoretical exploration and fostering versatile talents. This article systematically discusses the opportunities and challenges arising from the aforementioned issues and proposes effective strategies to address these concerns.

Objective:To investigate the quality issues in medical reviews written by medical postgraduate students, and to provide a reference for improving the quality of medical reviews written by such students.Methods:A total of 141 medical reviews written by the medical postgraduate students from various affiliated hospitals of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from 2018 to 2022 were collected, and the quality of these medical reviews was evaluated in terms of topic selection and writing expression skills. As for topic selection, a self-designed innovative questionnaire (hereinafter referred to as topic questionnaire) was used to collect the evaluation of external experts, and as for writing expression, the reviews were assessed based on the criteria in relevant literature from the aspects of the outline of the review, the timeliness of references, analysis and evaluation, and the quality of the text. EPIDATA 3.2 was used to input data, and SPSS 20.0 was used for the chi-square test.Results:A total of 135 (96%, 135/141) valid questionnaires were collected in this study, and the results showed that 70% (94/135) of the review topics lacked novelty. The assessment of writing skills showed that 95% (128/135) of the reviews had outdated references, and 68% (92/135) lacked focus, hierarchy or logic in outline, which accounted for a higher proportion than the reviews with analysis and evaluation issues (59%, 80/135) and text quality issues (61%, 83/135) ( P<0.05). Conclusion:There are many quality issues in the medical reviews written by medical postgraduate students, such as a lack of novelty in topic selection and low overall quality of outlines. In order to improve the abilities of scientific research among medical postgraduate students, universities and supervisors should strengthen the guidance of innovative thinking in topic selection and enhance the training of writing expression skills, such as scientific analysis and logic.

Objective:To investigate the application and effect of blended teaching model in clinical skill training.Methods:According to the practical teaching syllabus for undergraduate medical students in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the national practical operation examination for medical practitioners, 20 basic skills of internal medicine, surgery, gynecology, pediatrics, and emergency were selected. A total of 120 junior medical students in the experimental group received the practice course of basic clinical skill operations using the online and offline blended teaching model in the academic years of 2020-2021, and 120 medical students in the control group received this course using the offline teaching model alone during the same period of time. The two groups were compared in terms of process completeness, skill proficiency, aseptic concept, communication and care, and clinical thinking, and a questionnaire survey was conducted for the students in the experimental group to investigate course design, adaptability, interest, satisfaction, and learning effect. SPSS 21.0 was used to perform the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the chi-square test.Results:There were no significant differences between the two groups in general information such as sex and major. The experimental group had significantly better scores of the above practical abilities than the control group [88 (86,89) vs. 75 (72,77), 57 (56,58) vs. 52 (50,54), 7 (6,8) vs. 5 (4,6), 8 (7,8) vs. 5 (4,6), 9 (8,9) vs. 6(6,7), 8 (7,9) vs. 7 (6,7), P<0.001], and the questionnaire survey showed that the students in the experimental group gave a relatively high overall evaluation of the course (4.0-4.8 points). Conclusions:The blended teaching model is beneficial to the cultivation of clinical skills and practical ability in undergraduate medical students and can help to enhance their self-learning and operational abilities and improve classroom efficiency and teaching effectiveness.

This paper aims to discuss the ideas and experience about the radiology residency training system of Canada with a presentation of its base accreditation standards for five aspects, competency goals for seven roles, four stages of training arrangement, and two types of final assessment questions. Although the Canada's radiology residency program differs from China's standardized resident and specialist training programs for radiology, there are still several points that are worth referencing, including emphasizing the training priority of competency goals, providing a specific basis for the stratification of training, offering clear guidance for the implementation of training content, and improving assessment methods to focus on competency goals. These points are of great value for improving the standardized radiology resident and specialist training programs in China, so as to provide a reference for the training of excellent radiologists in China.