Objective To compare the sedative and analgesic effects of remifentanil combined with propofol administered by target-controlled infusion(TCI)and intravenous infusion during local anesthesia.Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients,aged 18-55 yr,with body mass index ＜ 30 kg/m2,scheduled for plastic surgery under local anesthesia,were equally and randomly divided into TCI group(group T)and intravenous infusion group (group V).Remifentanil(the initial target plasma concentration 1.0 ng/ml)and propofol(the initial target plasma concentration 1.0 ng/ml)were given by TCI before local anesthesia in group T.Remifentanil was infused at a rate of 0.05 μg·kg-1 ·min-1 after a loading dose of 0.25 μg/kg and propofol was infused at a rate of 3 mg·kg-1 ·h-1 after a loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg in group V.The target plasma concentration or infusion rate was adjusted to maintain the modified OAA/S score of 2 or 3.Hypoxemia,bradypnea and/or apnea were recorded during operation.The total amount of remifentanil and propofol consumed was calculated.Results Compared with group V,the incidence of hypoxemia,bradypnea and/or apnea were significantly decreased during operation,and the total amount of remifentanil and propofol consumed was significantly reduced in group T(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion The sedative and analgesic effects of remifentanil combined with propofol given by TCI are superior to those given by intravenous infusion during local anesthesia,with better safety.

Objective To compare remifentanil?propofol target?controlled infusion ( TCI ) with sufentanil?propofol TCI for sedation and analgesia in the patients undergoing local anesthesia. Methods Sixty patients, aged 17?54 yr, with body mass index <30 kg∕m2, scheduled for elective plastic surgery underlocal anesthesia, were equally and randomly divided into remifentanil group (group R) and sufentanil group(group S) by using a random number table. Remifentanil (the initial target plasma concentration 1?? 0ng∕ml) and propofol (the initial target plasma concentration 1?? 0 μg∕ml) were given by TCI in group R.Sufentanil (the initial target plasma concentration 0?? 10 ng∕ml) and propofol (the initial target plasma con?centration 1?? 0 μg∕ml) were given by TCI in group S. The target plasma concentration was adjusted to main?tain the modified Observer′s Assessment of Alertness∕Sedation Scale score of 2 or 3. The occurrence of painresponses, hypoxemia, bradypnea and∕or apnea was recorded during operation. The total amount of propofolconsumed was calculated. Results There was no significant difference in the incidence of pain response,hypoxemia, bradypnea and∕or apnea, and total amount of propofol consumed between the two groups (P >0?? 05). Conclusion Remifentanil?propofol TCI provides similar sedative and analgesic efficacy to that a?chieved by sufentanil?propofol TCI in the patients undergoing local anesthesia.

Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sedative and analgesic anesthesia in surgical patients with supine and prone position .Methods Sixty female patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, aged from 18 -53 years, scheduled for elective plastic operations under sedative and analgesic anesthesia combined with local anesthesia were divided into two groups according to their surgical positions: supine group ( n=30 ) and prone group ( n=30 ) .All patients received Ⅳ dexmedetomidine ( DEX) 1 μg/kg over 15 min followed by 0.4 -0.7 μg/kg/h infusion. Both groups were administered Ⅳ midazolam 0.04 mg/kg and a continuous infusion of remifentanil of 0.1 μg/kg/min at the beginning of anesthesia .Heart rate ( HR) , mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse oximetry (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), bispectral index (BIS) and Ramsay sedation scores ( RSS) were recorded at the following time points: before anesthesia ( T0 ) , 5 min after induction with midazolam ( T1 ) , 10 min after induction of midazolam ( T2 ) , immediately after induction with DEX( T3 ) , the beginning of local anesthesia ( T4 ) , the beginning of surgery ( T5 ) , 30 min after anesthesia induction ( T6 ) , 60 min after anesthesia induction ( T7 ) , immediately after turning off DEX infusion (T8), the end of surgery (T9).Incidences of respiratory depression, incidences of apnea, oxygen supplementation by facial mask and jaw-thrust, frequencies of body movements and additional rescue medication were also recorded .After surgery , recall of events during surgery , the visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain in PACU, the satisfaction levels of patients and surgeons were also assessed .Results No significant differences were found in MAP , SpO2 , RR, BIS, RSS scores at any time point between two groups (all P >0.05).There were no significant differences in incidences of respiratory depression , frequencies of body movements and additional rescue medication during surgery between groups ( all P>0. 05).Neither were recall of events during surgery , the visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and the satisfaction levels of patients and surgeons after surgery (all P>0.05).The HR at time points of T0, T1, T2 in prone group were significantly higher than those in supine group (all P<0.05).Compared with the supine group , the incidences of apnea , oxygen supplementation by facial mask and jaw-thrust in prone group were significantly lower .Conclusions Sedative and analgesic anesthesia is effective and safe for patients with prone surgical position and has a lower incidence of upper airway obstruction during surgery than patients in supine surgical position .

Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sedative and analgesic anesthesia in surgical patients with supine and prone position .Methods Sixty female patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, aged from 18 -53 years, scheduled for elective plastic operations under sedative and analgesic anesthesia combined with local anesthesia were divided into two groups according to their surgical positions: supine group ( n=30 ) and prone group ( n=30 ) .All patients received Ⅳ dexmedetomidine ( DEX) 1 μg/kg over 15 min followed by 0.4 -0.7 μg/kg/h infusion. Both groups were administered Ⅳ midazolam 0.04 mg/kg and a continuous infusion of remifentanil of 0.1 μg/kg/min at the beginning of anesthesia .Heart rate ( HR) , mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse oximetry (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), bispectral index (BIS) and Ramsay sedation scores ( RSS) were recorded at the following time points: before anesthesia ( T0 ) , 5 min after induction with midazolam ( T1 ) , 10 min after induction of midazolam ( T2 ) , immediately after induction with DEX( T3 ) , the beginning of local anesthesia ( T4 ) , the beginning of surgery ( T5 ) , 30 min after anesthesia induction ( T6 ) , 60 min after anesthesia induction ( T7 ) , immediately after turning off DEX infusion (T8), the end of surgery (T9).Incidences of respiratory depression, incidences of apnea, oxygen supplementation by facial mask and jaw-thrust, frequencies of body movements and additional rescue medication were also recorded .After surgery , recall of events during surgery , the visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain in PACU, the satisfaction levels of patients and surgeons were also assessed .Results No significant differences were found in MAP , SpO2 , RR, BIS, RSS scores at any time point between two groups (all P >0.05).There were no significant differences in incidences of respiratory depression , frequencies of body movements and additional rescue medication during surgery between groups ( all P>0. 05).Neither were recall of events during surgery , the visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and the satisfaction levels of patients and surgeons after surgery (all P>0.05).The HR at time points of T0, T1, T2 in prone group were significantly higher than those in supine group (all P<0.05).Compared with the supine group , the incidences of apnea , oxygen supplementation by facial mask and jaw-thrust in prone group were significantly lower .Conclusions Sedative and analgesic anesthesia is effective and safe for patients with prone surgical position and has a lower incidence of upper airway obstruction during surgery than patients in supine surgical position .