1.Clinical study of Yinhuajiedu Granules for influenza with wind-heat type
Jianping LU ; Jinghang JIANG ; Hui ZHANG ;
Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine 1992;0(02):-
0.05). No adverse reations occurred. Conclusion: Yinghuajiedu Granules is safe and effective for influenza with wind heat type.
2.Thymosin alpha 1 for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy
Yongrong LIANG ; Yang KE ; Jianhong ZHONG ; Zhe GUO ; Jinghang JIANG ; Bangde XIANG
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2014;(14):925-929
Objective: The effect of thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1) on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical hepatectomy was assessed. Methods: A total of 558 HCC patients treated by radical hepatectomy were retrospectively collected. Patients in the treatment group (n=146) received postoperative Tα1 therapy, whereas patients in the control group (n=412) did not. Propensity scale matching was conducted to improve the balance between the two groups. Changes in liver function, recurrence-free survival rates, and overall survival rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Postoperative liver function (i.e., TBIL, ALB, ALT, and PT) in the treatment group was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05). The one-, two-, and three-year recurrence-free survival rates and overall survival rates in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P=0.019 and P=0.011, respectively). Conclusion:Postoperative Tα1 therapy can improve postoperative liver function, thus significantly prolonging recurrence-free survival and overall survival.
3.Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with or without postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization: a comparative study
Jinghang JIANG ; Zhe GUO ; Yongrong LIANG ; Yang KE ; Jianhong ZHONG ; Lequn LI ; Bangde XIANG
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery 2014;20(5):333-337
Objective To explore the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on the survival of patients after radical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods Between March 2007 and March 2010,229 HCC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively studied.Patients who underwent resection alone were used as the control group (138 patients) while those who received post-operative adjuvant TACE was used as the interventional group.In order to balance the covariates between the groups,a matched comparison of the patients was done by selecting patients using the propensity score matching (PSM).Then,the efficacy of adjuvant TACE upon survival was evaluated.Results After PSM,we obtained 67 pairs of patients.The survival time for the interventional and the control groups were 32.1 months and 28.3 months respectively.The survival rates at year 1,2,3 post-resection were 94.0%,84.8% and 75.3% in the interventional group versus 83.6%,69.9% and 61.5% in the control group respectively.There were no significant differences between the two groups (P =0.062).Univariate analysis showed the serum level of AFP,tumor size,number of tumor,BCLC stage,and adjuvant TACE significantly affected the survival of HCC patients who received radical resection (P <0.05).Cox model suggested that AFP≥400 μg/L and tumor diameter > 5 cm were independent risk factors of survival for HCC patients who received radical resection (P < 0.05).Conclusion Postoperative adjuvant TACE had no positive effect on survival,and AFP level ≥ 400 μg/L and tumor size >5 cm were independent risk factors of survival of HCC patients who received radical resection.
4.Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Cefoperazone/sulbactam Combined with Moxifloxacin and Amikacin versus Cefoperazone/ sulbactam Combined with Tigecycline in the Treatment of Pneumonia with Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia
Jinglei LI ; Xiangmei RUAN ; Jing LIU ; Jinghang JIANG ; Mingwei YANG ; Lin LIU ; Songlin MA ; Jiamin YANG
China Pharmacy 2019;30(23):3271-3275
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and economics of cefoperazone/sulbactam combined with moxifloxacin and amikacin versus cefoperazone/sulbactam combined with tigecycline in the treatment of pneumonia with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB). METHODS: By prospective study, 150 MDRAB pneumonia patients were selected from Jingmen Second People’s Hospital during Jan. 1st, 2016-Aug. 31st, 2019, and then randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 75 cases in each group. Control group was given Cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium for injection (3 g, q8 h, ivgtt) combined with Tigecycline for injection (first dose 100 mg, maintenance dose 50 mg, q12 h, ivgtt). Observation group was give Cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium for injection (3 g, q8 h, ivgtt) combined with Moxifloxacin hydrochloride and sodium chloride injection (400 mg, qd, ivgtt) and Amikacin sulfate injection (0.6 g, qd, ivgtt). The treatment lasted for 14 days in both groups. The time for body temperature to return to normal, lung rales disappearance, WBC to return to normal and PCT to return to normal, clinical efficacy, bacterial clearance rate and the occurrence of ADR were compared between 2 groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate the cost- effectiveness ratio (C/E) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ΔC/ΔE) of 2 groups using antibiotics cost as cost. Sensitivity analysis was performed by reducing drug cost by 15%. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance in the time for body temperature to return to normal, lung rales disappearance, WBC to return to normal and PCT to return to normal between control group and observation group (P>0.05). Clinical response rates of 2 groups were 85.33% and 81.33%, and bacterial clearance rate were 89.33% and 82.67%, with statistical significance (P>0.05). No serious ADR occurred in either group. The antibacterial cost of control group and observation group were 32 371.49 yuan/person and 9 367.82 yuan/person. C/E of clinical response rate were 379.37 and 115.18, and C/E of bacterial clearance rate were 362.38 and 113.32 in 2 groups, respectively. ΔC/ΔE of clinical response rate and bacterial clearance rate between control group and observation group were 5 750.92 and 3 454.00. Sensitivity analysis supported cost-effectiveness analysis results. CONCLUSIONS: Cefoperazone/sulbactam combined with moxifloxacin and amikacin versus cefoperazone/sulbactam combined with tigecycline in the treatment of pneumonia with MDRAB has similar efficacy, but cefoperazone/sulbactam combined with moxifloxacin and amikacin has economic and social benefits.