Purpose: Distinguishing a fever caused by infection from the necessary febrile response in injured patients is difficult, because trauma patients often have concomitant obvious infectious origins. In traumatic brain injury, early fever might be associated with worse clinical outcomes; however, few reports on trauma patients without brain injury are available.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, consecutive trauma patients without brain injury who were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit during a 3 year period were included. The surgical and clinical outcomes were compared according to body temperature. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was used to identify the relationship between body temperature and injury severity.
Results: A total of 111 patients were included. Body temperature increased as the injury severity score increased up to 47.717, above which it decreased. Mortality was high in hypothermic patients (72.7%; p < 0.001); however, few differences were observed between normothermic and hyperthermic patients (3.5% and 2.4%, respectively). The nonsurvivors had lower body temperatures on the 1st and 2nd days after admission (36 ˚C and 36.9 ˚C) compared with the survivors (37.3 ˚C and 37.7 ˚C; p < 0.001 and p = 0.006). In severely injured patients, low levels of inflammatory biomarkers and low body temperature were correlated with mortality.
Conclusions Fever in trauma patients without brain injury is correlated with injury severity but not with prognosis. Hypothermia on the 1st and 2nd days after admission was significantly correlated with mortality. In severely injured patients, a decreased inflammatory response might play a certain role in promoting a high mortality rate.

Purpose: Distinguishing a fever caused by infection from the necessary febrile response in injured patients is difficult, because trauma patients often have concomitant obvious infectious origins. In traumatic brain injury, early fever might be associated with worse clinical outcomes; however, few reports on trauma patients without brain injury are available.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, consecutive trauma patients without brain injury who were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit during a 3 year period were included. The surgical and clinical outcomes were compared according to body temperature. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was used to identify the relationship between body temperature and injury severity.
Results: A total of 111 patients were included. Body temperature increased as the injury severity score increased up to 47.717, above which it decreased. Mortality was high in hypothermic patients (72.7%; p < 0.001); however, few differences were observed between normothermic and hyperthermic patients (3.5% and 2.4%, respectively). The nonsurvivors had lower body temperatures on the 1st and 2nd days after admission (36 ˚C and 36.9 ˚C) compared with the survivors (37.3 ˚C and 37.7 ˚C; p < 0.001 and p = 0.006). In severely injured patients, low levels of inflammatory biomarkers and low body temperature were correlated with mortality.
Conclusions Fever in trauma patients without brain injury is correlated with injury severity but not with prognosis. Hypothermia on the 1st and 2nd days after admission was significantly correlated with mortality. In severely injured patients, a decreased inflammatory response might play a certain role in promoting a high mortality rate.

Surgeons occasionally encounter a patient with a gastric cancer invading an adjacent organ, such as the pancreas, liver, or transverse colon. Although there is no established guideline for treatment of invasive gastric cancer, combined resection with radical gastrectomy is conventionally performed for curative purposes. We recently treated a patient with a large gastric cancer invading the abdominal wall, which was initially diagnosed as a simple abdominal wall abscess. Computed tomography showed that an abscess had formed adjacent to the greater curvature of the stomach. During surgery, we made an incision on the abdominal wall to drain the abscess, and performed curative total gastrectomy with partial excision of the involved abdominal wall. The patient received intensive treatment and wound management postoperatively with no surgery-related adverse events. However, the patient could not receive adjuvant chemotherapy and expired on the 82nd postoperative day.
Abdominal Wall* ; Abscess* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Colon, Transverse ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Liver ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Pancreas ; Stomach ; Stomach Neoplasms* ; Stomach Rupture ; Surgeons ; Wounds and Injuries

PURPOSE: The postoperative treatment after appendectomy is usually decided on the basis of the surgeons' intraoperative findings. Comparatively, the pathologic diagnosis of appendicitis is confirmed several days after the surgery; therefore, it usually does not affect the postoperative treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to investigate the discrepancies between the surgical and pathologic diagnoses of appendicitis and to identify their clinical implication. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in 1,817 patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for the final diagnosis of appendicitis. The clinical variables that could estimate the severity of appendicitis and the intensity of postoperative treatment were analyzed and compared according to the surgical and pathologic diagnoses. RESULTS: Of 1,321 cases of surgically simple appendicitis, 254 (29.3%) were pathologically complicated appendicitis. On the other hand, 221 of 496 cases (44.5%) of surgically complicated appendicitis were pathologically simple. Neither the surgical nor the pathologic diagnosis of appendicitis affected the development of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (P = 0.079 for surgical diagnosis; P = 0.288 for pathologic diagnosis); however, the surgical diagnosis showed more correlation with the severity of disease and the intensity of the treatment pathway than did the pathologic diagnosis. CONCLUSION: There were discrepancies between the surgeons' intraoperative assessment and the pathologists' final histologic diagnosis of appendicitis. The surgeon's classification might be more predictive of the outcome than the pathologist's because only the surgeon's findings are available immediately after surgery.