1.A case of 46,XX, del(18)(p11.1).
Jung Hee JIN ; Rhi Ae JU ; Bo Hoon OH
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;35(9):1380-1382
No abstract available.
2.Training satisfaction according to the type of family practice residency program.
Yun Ju KANG ; Mi Kyung OH ; Young Jin LEE
Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine 1992;13(11):869-877
No abstract available.
Family Practice*
;
Humans
;
Internship and Residency*
3.Coexistence of naturally-occuring anti-M in a M positive patient a case report.
Hyun Ok KIM ; Jin Ju KIM ; Oh Hun KWON
Korean Journal of Clinical Pathology 1993;13(1):121-124
No abstract available.
Humans
4.Coexistence of naturally-occuring anti-M in a M positive patient a case report.
Hyun Ok KIM ; Jin Ju KIM ; Oh Hun KWON
Korean Journal of Clinical Pathology 1992;12(1):121-124
No abstract available.
Humans
5.A STUDY ON THE FITNESS OF THE IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC CROWN ACCORDING TO MARGIN TYPE.
Tae Hun JU ; Sang Chun OH ; Jin Keun DONG
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 1998;36(6):846-857
The purpose of this study was to compare the fitness of the IPS Empress ceramic crowns according to margin type such as bevel, shoulder, rounded shoulder, shoulder with bevel, rounded shoulder with bevel and grooved bevel. After 10 experimental dies were constructed for each group, the IPS Empress ceramic crowns were fabricated on the dies, cemented with resin cement(Bistite resin cement, Tokuyama Soda Co. Ltd., Japan) and embeded in clear epoxy resin. Each specimen was sectioned with a low speed diamond saw in both the faciopalatal and the mesiodistal direction. The cement film thickness was measured with a measuring microscope. The obtained results were as follows : 1. The fitness at the external margin was good in the following order: rounded shoulder(28.99), shoulder with bevel(31.33), grooved bevel(31.79), rounded shoulder with bevel(34.65), bevel(35.02) and shoulder(35.08). However there is no significant statistical difference. 2. The fitness at the internal margin of bevel(25.75), rounded shoulder(31.24), shoulder with bevel(32.07) and rounded shoulder with bevel(34.45) was better than that of shoulder(47.98). 3. The fitness at the axial surface of bevel(26.58) was better than that of shoulder(49.59). 4. The fitness at the central fossa was good in the following order: shoulder with bevel(38.88), grooved bevel(40.46) rounded shoulder with shoulder(46.29), shoulder(48.91), bevel(49.47) and rounded bevel(52.07). However there is no significant statistical difference. 5. Overall fitness of bevel(29.71), rounded shoulder(32.49) and shoulder with bevel(34.47) was better than that of shoulder(44.73).
Ceramics*
;
Crowns*
;
Diamond
;
Resin Cements
;
Shoulder
6.Comparison of three methods for inactivation IgM antibodies for determination of IgG anti-A or anti-B.
Hyun Ok KIM ; Hyon Sok CHO ; Kwang Soo PARK ; Oh Hun KWON ; Jin Ju KIM
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion 1992;3(2):159-165
No abstract available.
Antibodies*
;
Immunoglobulin G*
;
Immunoglobulin M*
7.Platelet utilization in a university hospital.
Hyun Ok KIM ; Kwang Soo PARK ; Jin Ju KIM ; Oh Hun KWON
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion 1991;2(2):169-174
No abstract available.
Blood Platelets*
8.A Case of Stomach Perforation during the Therapy of Rheumatic Carditis.
Young Ju LEE ; Man Jin CHUNG ; Soon Ok BYUN ; Myung Hi SHIN ; Ji Sub OH
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1983;26(12):1241-1246
No abstract available.
Myocarditis*
;
Stomach*
9.Massive transfusion in Severance hospital.
Mi Kyeong LEE ; Hyun Ok KIM ; Seong Geun HONG ; Oh Hun KWON ; Jin Ju KIM
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion 1993;4(1):23-28
No abstract available.
10.Is a Suction Drain Necessary in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?.
Jin Young PARK ; Ju Hyun SIM ; Jae Hyung LEE ; Kyung Soo OH ; Seok Won CHUNG
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2016;19(3):137-142
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of suction drain use following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by comparing early pain score and range of motion (ROM) between groups with and without suction drains. METHODS: The study included 153 patients with rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repairs at our clinic from April 2014 to March 2015. Following surgery, a suction drain was used in 85 patients (group D) and not used in 68 patients (group ND). There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, or total operation time. The clinical outcome with regard to pain (assessed by pain scores and analgesic requests) and passive ROM was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Immediate postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly higher in group D (p=0.001), although there was no difference in pain outcomes between the groups during the 3-month follow-up period. A statistically significant difference in passive ROM was observed at the postoperative 2- and 6-week follow-ups (p=0.036, 0.035, and 0.034 in forward elevation (FE), external rotation at the side (ER) and 90 ER at weeks 2, respectively; 0.045 and 0.009 in FE and ER at weeks 6, respectively); however no significant difference was observed at the end of 3 months. During the study period, no complication was reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of suction drains after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair provided little benefit in terms of ROM or pain in the early postoperative period (up to 3 months).
Arthroscopy
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Postoperative Period
;
Range of Motion, Articular
;
Rotator Cuff*
;
Shoulder
;
Suction*
;
Tears
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail