1.Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis.
Shardul Madhav SOMAN ; Jimmy CHOKSHI ; Naitik CHHATRALA ; Gulam Haider THARADARA ; Mukund PRABHAKAR
Asian Spine Journal 2017;11(2):278-284
STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study that was undertaken at a single centre and involved 80 consecutive patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a qualitative grading system as seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool in the management of multilevel LSS. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: LSS diagnosis is clinical but is usually radiologically supplemented. However, there are often multilevel radiological findings with non-specific or atypical clinical features. We used a qualitative grading system to help in the decision-making process of the management of patients with multilevel LSS. METHODS: 80 patients with LSS were treated with decompression and prospectively followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. All had failed conservative treatment. Qualitative grading of LSS severity was based on the dural sac in T2 weighted axial MRI images at all disc levels and was done from L1–2 to L5–S1 (n=400). Functional outcome was assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI). RESULTS: The mean patient age was 56.6 years, with a gender ratio of 0.6:1. Forty patients had degenerative LSS and 40 had degenerative spondylolysthesis. A total of 178 levels were decompressed, the majority of which were L4–L5 (43.82%), followed by L5–S1 (41.57%). According to our qualitative grading system, grade D stenosis (53.93%) was decompressed most frequently, followed by grade C stenosis (41.57%). The average preoperative ODI score was 58.55%, which later reduced to 19.15%. Seventy percent of patients achieved excellent results, whereas 30% achieved good results. CONCLUSIONS: Morphological grading is a useful tool in decision making in surgery for multilevel LSS. Grade C and D stenosis should be decompressed, whereas A and B should not be, unless clinically justified.
Constriction, Pathologic*
;
Decision Making
;
Decompression
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Prospective Studies
;
Spinal Stenosis
;
Spine*
2.Simultaneous bilateral shoulder and bilateral central acetabular fracture dislocation: What to do?
Hardik SHETH ; Abhijeet-Ashok SALUNKE ; Ramesh PANCHAL ; Jimmy CHOKSHI ; G-I NAMBI ; Saranjeet SINGH ; Amit PATEL ; Ranu SHETH
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2016;19(1):59-62
Musculoskeletal injuries following seizures have a high morbidity and mortality. These injuries are often missed and the diagnosis is delayed due to a lack of clinical suspicion and appropriate investigations.We report a case of 72 years old male with simultaneous bilateral central acetabular fracture dislocation and bilateral posterior shoulder fracture dislocation secondary to an epileptic seizure. Present study high- lights the significance of clinical suspicion and clinico-radiological evaluation for diagnosis of a rare injury following episode of seizures. Simultaneous fracture dislocation of all four limbs treated with a holistic approach can lead to a good functional recovery. Surgical management with open reduction and internal fixation is preferred and replacement arthroplasty should be reserved for cases with implant failure and elderly patients.
Acetabulum
;
injuries
;
Aged
;
Epilepsy
;
complications
;
Fracture Dislocation
;
diagnostic imaging
;
surgery
;
Fractures, Bone
;
surgery
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Shoulder Fractures
;
diagnostic imaging
;
surgery