0.05), whereas the mean difference on the portal vein contrast enhanced phase was statistically greater than that on the hepatic artery contrast enhanced phase or delayed phase ( P

Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomes of implant-retained overdentures.Methods:57 patients treated by implant-retained overdentures were included.Parameters for peri-implant tissue conditions (e.g.peri-implant probing depth,plaque index,bleeding on probing,mucosal hyperplasia,peri-implant marginal bone loss) and prosthetic complications were examined and recorded.The precentage of satisfaction of the patients was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS).Results:After an average follow-up of (48±11.3) months,the survival rate of the implants was 98.1%,the marginal bone loss was (1.38±0.74) mm.There was no statistically difference among the different attachment groups(bar,magnet and ball) regarding the peri-implant marginal bone loss or bleeding on probing(P>0.05).The peri-implant probing depth and plaque index in patients with magnet and ball attachments were lower than those in patients with bar attachments(P<0.05).The major complications were the upper abutment fracture,prostheses fracture and screw loosening.Most patients were satisfied with their prostheses and there was no statistically significant difference between the attachment types(P>0.05),except that magnet and ball attachments were much easier to clean compared with bar attachments(P<0.05).Conclusion:Implant-retained overdenture is a successful and satisfactory treatment option for patients with edentulous jaw.The patients should been given regular clinical examinations to keep peri-implant tissue health and reduce the complications,especially those with bar attachments.

OBJECTIVE To analyze a neonate with multiple malformations and to correlate its genotype with phenotype. METHODS The karotypes of the child and her parents were subjected to G-banding chromosome analysis, and array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) was used for fine mapping of the aberrant region. RESULTS The karyotype of the child was ascertained as 46,XX,del(18)(p11.2). Array CGH has identified a 9.8 Mb deletion at 18p11.32-p11.22. The patient has presented features such as holoprosencephaly, choanal atresia, heart defect, and craniofacial dysmorphisms. CONCLUSION The de novo 18p deletion probably underlies the main clinical manifestations of the child.
Abnormalities, Multiple ; genetics ; Chromosome Banding ; Chromosome Deletion ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18 ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Phenotype