Purpose: Even after allergic rhinitis is diagnosed and treated, various symptoms such as runny nose, sneezing, and itchy nose recur periodically due to various environmental factors. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted to confirm the effectiveness of mask-based aromatherapy as a method of alleviating allergic rhinitis during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The study participants were adults between the ages of 19 and 60 who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis and had a Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) of 2 or more. Participants were randomly assigned to an aromatherapy group that was provided aromatherapy essential oils and a control group that did not receive aromatherapy. Participants in the aromatherapy group were asked to drop an aromatherapy essential oil onto a disposable face mask and wear it twice a day for two weeks. Results: The aromatherapy group experience significant alleviation of allergic rhinitis symptoms (visual analogue scale, F = 11.22, p < .001; TNSS, F = 15.82, p < .001). The aromatherapy group also showed significantly higher improvements in fatigue (F = 8.28, p < .001), allergic rhinitis-specific quality of life (F = 11.12, p < .001). Conclusion The oils used in this study appeared to be effective in relieving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. In particular, the mask drop inhalation method was applied in light of mandatory mask-wearing due to the global COVID-19 pandemic during this study period. Mask drop inhalation is a method of inhaling oil close to the nose and is considered an effective method for reducing the inconvenience of applying oil.

Purpose: This study developed a thermoelectric element (TEE) tourniquet integrating a tourniquet with a temperature control device capable of delivering heat or cold therapy. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of the TEE tourniquet on pain, stress, and satisfaction during venipuncture. Methods: In total, 118 hospitalized adults were randomly assigned to heat therapy (40~45°C), cold therapy (0~10°C), thermal grill illusion therapy (alternating heat and cold), or the control group. The TEE tourniquet was applied 10 cm above the puncture site. A temperature intervention began 5 seconds before cannulation and was maintained during the procedure, typically lasting 10 to 30 seconds. The control group received the TEE tourniquet without temperature activation. Outcomes included perceived pain and stress (numerical rating scale), observed pain (Wong-Baker FACES), SpO2, stress index, and participant satisfaction. Results: Significant differences were found among groups in perceived pain (F = 4.82, p = .003), observed pain (F = 5.50, p = .001), and perceived stress (F = 4.72, p = .004). The heat therapy group reported significantly lower pain and stress than the control group. No significant differences were found in SpO₂, the stress index, or satisfaction. Conclusion Heat therapy via the TEE tourniquet significantly reduced venipuncture-related pain and stress. Given its short application time and usability, this device may serve as a clinically useful nursing intervention to improve comfort during invasive procedures.

Purpose: This study developed a thermoelectric element (TEE) tourniquet integrating a tourniquet with a temperature control device capable of delivering heat or cold therapy. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of the TEE tourniquet on pain, stress, and satisfaction during venipuncture. Methods: In total, 118 hospitalized adults were randomly assigned to heat therapy (40~45°C), cold therapy (0~10°C), thermal grill illusion therapy (alternating heat and cold), or the control group. The TEE tourniquet was applied 10 cm above the puncture site. A temperature intervention began 5 seconds before cannulation and was maintained during the procedure, typically lasting 10 to 30 seconds. The control group received the TEE tourniquet without temperature activation. Outcomes included perceived pain and stress (numerical rating scale), observed pain (Wong-Baker FACES), SpO2, stress index, and participant satisfaction. Results: Significant differences were found among groups in perceived pain (F = 4.82, p = .003), observed pain (F = 5.50, p = .001), and perceived stress (F = 4.72, p = .004). The heat therapy group reported significantly lower pain and stress than the control group. No significant differences were found in SpO₂, the stress index, or satisfaction. Conclusion Heat therapy via the TEE tourniquet significantly reduced venipuncture-related pain and stress. Given its short application time and usability, this device may serve as a clinically useful nursing intervention to improve comfort during invasive procedures.

Purpose: This study developed a thermoelectric element (TEE) tourniquet integrating a tourniquet with a temperature control device capable of delivering heat or cold therapy. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of the TEE tourniquet on pain, stress, and satisfaction during venipuncture. Methods: In total, 118 hospitalized adults were randomly assigned to heat therapy (40~45°C), cold therapy (0~10°C), thermal grill illusion therapy (alternating heat and cold), or the control group. The TEE tourniquet was applied 10 cm above the puncture site. A temperature intervention began 5 seconds before cannulation and was maintained during the procedure, typically lasting 10 to 30 seconds. The control group received the TEE tourniquet without temperature activation. Outcomes included perceived pain and stress (numerical rating scale), observed pain (Wong-Baker FACES), SpO2, stress index, and participant satisfaction. Results: Significant differences were found among groups in perceived pain (F = 4.82, p = .003), observed pain (F = 5.50, p = .001), and perceived stress (F = 4.72, p = .004). The heat therapy group reported significantly lower pain and stress than the control group. No significant differences were found in SpO₂, the stress index, or satisfaction. Conclusion Heat therapy via the TEE tourniquet significantly reduced venipuncture-related pain and stress. Given its short application time and usability, this device may serve as a clinically useful nursing intervention to improve comfort during invasive procedures.

Purpose: This study developed a thermoelectric element (TEE) tourniquet integrating a tourniquet with a temperature control device capable of delivering heat or cold therapy. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of the TEE tourniquet on pain, stress, and satisfaction during venipuncture. Methods: In total, 118 hospitalized adults were randomly assigned to heat therapy (40~45°C), cold therapy (0~10°C), thermal grill illusion therapy (alternating heat and cold), or the control group. The TEE tourniquet was applied 10 cm above the puncture site. A temperature intervention began 5 seconds before cannulation and was maintained during the procedure, typically lasting 10 to 30 seconds. The control group received the TEE tourniquet without temperature activation. Outcomes included perceived pain and stress (numerical rating scale), observed pain (Wong-Baker FACES), SpO2, stress index, and participant satisfaction. Results: Significant differences were found among groups in perceived pain (F = 4.82, p = .003), observed pain (F = 5.50, p = .001), and perceived stress (F = 4.72, p = .004). The heat therapy group reported significantly lower pain and stress than the control group. No significant differences were found in SpO₂, the stress index, or satisfaction. Conclusion Heat therapy via the TEE tourniquet significantly reduced venipuncture-related pain and stress. Given its short application time and usability, this device may serve as a clinically useful nursing intervention to improve comfort during invasive procedures.