1.Efficacy and safety evaluation of systemic red light therapy for burn wound repair.
Jian LIU ; Qingwei FANG ; Jiexin ZHENG ; Yi DOU ; Qin ZHANG ; Zhengjiang LIAO ; Cai LIN ; Jianjun XU
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2010;34(4):293-296
OBJECTIVETo investigate effects of systemic red light therapy on wound repair of burned patients and discuss its possible mechanisms of wound healing promotion.
METHODS138 burned patients were randomly divided into systemic red light treatment group (n = 69) and control group (n = 69). Patients in control group received routine therapy, while those in test group were given systemic red light therapy once a day, 30 minutes at a time until the wounds were recovered. The clinical findings and variables indicating wound repair were assessed on the 7th, 10th, 14th day, 21st day post-burn and the day when the wounds were healed.
RESULTSMean time of wound recovery were 19.86 +/- 2.43 days and 21.02 +/- 2.97 days respectively of those deep-thickness wounds in test group and control group, with statistically significance (P < 0.05). For the severity of the pain, VAS during time of dressing change on the 10th, 14th day post burn was lower in test group than that in control group which indicated less painful in test group (P < 0.05), suggesting pain relief effect of systemic red light therapy.
CONCLUSIONSystemic red light therapy was effective to promote wound healing of deep-thickness burn wounds and other similar acute wounds. Simultaneously, it is efficacious in pain relief and safe for those patients.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Burns ; therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Light ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Management ; Phototherapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing ; Young Adult
2.Effects of single i.v. subanesthetic dose of ketamine on heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation for antidepressant treatment.
Jiexin FANG ; Le XIAO ; Xuequan ZHU ; Gang WANG ; Ruobing FENG ; Yongdong. HU
Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 2019;45(6):361-364
Objective To investigate the effects of single i.v. subanesthetic dose of ketamine on heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation for antidepressant treatment. Methods Patients with severe depressive disorder were randomized to ketamine group (n=13) and control group (n=14). Ketamine group received ketamine (0.5mg/kg) single injection whereas control group received saline single injection. Escitalopram (10 mg/d) were orally administered for 4 weeks simultaneously. Comparisons were made on the heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation at baseline, 40 min, 100 min, and 280 min after injection between the two groups. Results The main effects of time but not group were significant for all parameters including heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, (P<0.05). Interaction of time×group was significant (P<0.05). All parameters including heart rate (F=16.85, P<0.01), systolic blood pressure (F=15.82, P<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (F=8.63, P<0.01) with time were significant in ketamine group. The heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in ketamine group were significantly higher at 40 min than at other time points (P<0.05), while were no significant difference among other time points (P>0.05). There was no statistical significance of main effect of time, group and interaction of time×group in oxygen saturation between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Single subanesthetic dose ketamine intravenous drip for antidepressant therapy may cause a transient increase in heart rate and blood pressure.