Background: This study investigated trends in national expenditures on anticancer and immunomodulating agents from 2013 to 2022. Methods: Information was obtained from the National Health Insurance claims data spanning a period of 10 years, from 2013 to 2022. The subjects of this study are patients diagnosed with cancer who used anticancer agents between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Trends were examined across various categories, including sex, age groups, routes of healthcare use, and types of healthcare institutions. We calculated the compound annual growth rate in both the number of patients and expenditures by year. Results: In 2013, pharmaceutical expenditures amounted to USD 11,984 million, representing 25.5% of the total healthcare expenditures, which were USD 46,984 million.Within this pharmaceutical expenditure, anticancer medications constituted USD 584 million, or 4.9%. By 2022, pharmaceutical expenditures had risen to USD 22,093 million, accounting for 22.8% of the total healthcare expenditures of USD 96,904 million. Of this amount, USD 1,566 million was allocated to anticancer drugs, which represented 7.1% of the total pharmaceutical expenditures. Between 2013 and 2022, total healthcare expenditures experienced a significant increase of 106.2%, reaching USD 49,920 million. Concurrently, pharmaceutical expenditures rose by 91.1% to USD 10,919 million, while expenditures on anticancer drugs surged by 168.2% to USD 982 million. In 2022, the category with the highest expenditures was ATC L01FF, which includes programmed cell death protein 1/death ligand 1 inhibitors such as nivolumab, totaling USD 266.2 million. This was followed by L01FD at USD 198.8 million and L01EA at USD 140.4 million. Since 2018, however, spending on immune checkpoint blockers targeting cell death proteins or ligands has continued to rise and currently ranks first. Conclusion The number of patients using anticancer drugs and the associated drug expenditures have risen between 2013 and 2022. As the share of anticancer drugs in total drug expenditures grows, so too do the overall expenditures. This escalating financial burden highlights the necessity for policymakers to thoroughly understand the appropriate and costeffective usage of anticancer drugs, as it directly influences the affordability and accessibility of healthcare services.

Background: This study investigated trends in national expenditures on anticancer and immunomodulating agents from 2013 to 2022. Methods: Information was obtained from the National Health Insurance claims data spanning a period of 10 years, from 2013 to 2022. The subjects of this study are patients diagnosed with cancer who used anticancer agents between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Trends were examined across various categories, including sex, age groups, routes of healthcare use, and types of healthcare institutions. We calculated the compound annual growth rate in both the number of patients and expenditures by year. Results: In 2013, pharmaceutical expenditures amounted to USD 11,984 million, representing 25.5% of the total healthcare expenditures, which were USD 46,984 million.Within this pharmaceutical expenditure, anticancer medications constituted USD 584 million, or 4.9%. By 2022, pharmaceutical expenditures had risen to USD 22,093 million, accounting for 22.8% of the total healthcare expenditures of USD 96,904 million. Of this amount, USD 1,566 million was allocated to anticancer drugs, which represented 7.1% of the total pharmaceutical expenditures. Between 2013 and 2022, total healthcare expenditures experienced a significant increase of 106.2%, reaching USD 49,920 million. Concurrently, pharmaceutical expenditures rose by 91.1% to USD 10,919 million, while expenditures on anticancer drugs surged by 168.2% to USD 982 million. In 2022, the category with the highest expenditures was ATC L01FF, which includes programmed cell death protein 1/death ligand 1 inhibitors such as nivolumab, totaling USD 266.2 million. This was followed by L01FD at USD 198.8 million and L01EA at USD 140.4 million. Since 2018, however, spending on immune checkpoint blockers targeting cell death proteins or ligands has continued to rise and currently ranks first. Conclusion The number of patients using anticancer drugs and the associated drug expenditures have risen between 2013 and 2022. As the share of anticancer drugs in total drug expenditures grows, so too do the overall expenditures. This escalating financial burden highlights the necessity for policymakers to thoroughly understand the appropriate and costeffective usage of anticancer drugs, as it directly influences the affordability and accessibility of healthcare services.

Background: This study investigated trends in national expenditures on anticancer and immunomodulating agents from 2013 to 2022. Methods: Information was obtained from the National Health Insurance claims data spanning a period of 10 years, from 2013 to 2022. The subjects of this study are patients diagnosed with cancer who used anticancer agents between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Trends were examined across various categories, including sex, age groups, routes of healthcare use, and types of healthcare institutions. We calculated the compound annual growth rate in both the number of patients and expenditures by year. Results: In 2013, pharmaceutical expenditures amounted to USD 11,984 million, representing 25.5% of the total healthcare expenditures, which were USD 46,984 million.Within this pharmaceutical expenditure, anticancer medications constituted USD 584 million, or 4.9%. By 2022, pharmaceutical expenditures had risen to USD 22,093 million, accounting for 22.8% of the total healthcare expenditures of USD 96,904 million. Of this amount, USD 1,566 million was allocated to anticancer drugs, which represented 7.1% of the total pharmaceutical expenditures. Between 2013 and 2022, total healthcare expenditures experienced a significant increase of 106.2%, reaching USD 49,920 million. Concurrently, pharmaceutical expenditures rose by 91.1% to USD 10,919 million, while expenditures on anticancer drugs surged by 168.2% to USD 982 million. In 2022, the category with the highest expenditures was ATC L01FF, which includes programmed cell death protein 1/death ligand 1 inhibitors such as nivolumab, totaling USD 266.2 million. This was followed by L01FD at USD 198.8 million and L01EA at USD 140.4 million. Since 2018, however, spending on immune checkpoint blockers targeting cell death proteins or ligands has continued to rise and currently ranks first. Conclusion The number of patients using anticancer drugs and the associated drug expenditures have risen between 2013 and 2022. As the share of anticancer drugs in total drug expenditures grows, so too do the overall expenditures. This escalating financial burden highlights the necessity for policymakers to thoroughly understand the appropriate and costeffective usage of anticancer drugs, as it directly influences the affordability and accessibility of healthcare services.

Background: This study investigated trends in national expenditures on anticancer and immunomodulating agents from 2013 to 2022. Methods: Information was obtained from the National Health Insurance claims data spanning a period of 10 years, from 2013 to 2022. The subjects of this study are patients diagnosed with cancer who used anticancer agents between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Trends were examined across various categories, including sex, age groups, routes of healthcare use, and types of healthcare institutions. We calculated the compound annual growth rate in both the number of patients and expenditures by year. Results: In 2013, pharmaceutical expenditures amounted to USD 11,984 million, representing 25.5% of the total healthcare expenditures, which were USD 46,984 million.Within this pharmaceutical expenditure, anticancer medications constituted USD 584 million, or 4.9%. By 2022, pharmaceutical expenditures had risen to USD 22,093 million, accounting for 22.8% of the total healthcare expenditures of USD 96,904 million. Of this amount, USD 1,566 million was allocated to anticancer drugs, which represented 7.1% of the total pharmaceutical expenditures. Between 2013 and 2022, total healthcare expenditures experienced a significant increase of 106.2%, reaching USD 49,920 million. Concurrently, pharmaceutical expenditures rose by 91.1% to USD 10,919 million, while expenditures on anticancer drugs surged by 168.2% to USD 982 million. In 2022, the category with the highest expenditures was ATC L01FF, which includes programmed cell death protein 1/death ligand 1 inhibitors such as nivolumab, totaling USD 266.2 million. This was followed by L01FD at USD 198.8 million and L01EA at USD 140.4 million. Since 2018, however, spending on immune checkpoint blockers targeting cell death proteins or ligands has continued to rise and currently ranks first. Conclusion The number of patients using anticancer drugs and the associated drug expenditures have risen between 2013 and 2022. As the share of anticancer drugs in total drug expenditures grows, so too do the overall expenditures. This escalating financial burden highlights the necessity for policymakers to thoroughly understand the appropriate and costeffective usage of anticancer drugs, as it directly influences the affordability and accessibility of healthcare services.

BACKGROUND: Hydrofluoric acid_(HF) is widely used in many industrial and domestic settings such as etching glass, and polishing metals. HF is one of the most corrosive inorganic acids and can produce progressive and serious tissue necrosis with severe pain. Since HF chemical burns can be asymptomatic for the first few hours, it is crucial to understand its toxicity and the early use of antidote. CASE: A 37-year-old man presented with erythematous lesion and pain on his face, anterior neck, both forearms, both thighs, and left ankle after injury resulting from a chemical burn caused by HF. He showed normal vital signs and dyspnea, but complained of a sore throat. Liquid form of HF had splashed on his face and anterior neck first and run down his forearms and thighs while working at HF supply tanks. Some of the HF was splashed into his mouth. He immediately removed his clothes and showered with abundant water. A 4.5% calcium gluconate jel was applied to the involved area. He was given subcutaneous injection of 10% calcium gluconate solution. During 17 days of admission he didn't show any signs of systemic intoxication or deep tissue defects. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate cleansing of the affected area with running cold water is the first critical treatment for a chemical burn due to HF. Applying calcium gluconate gel within one hour was very effective for preventing further damage to the injured area as well as systemic injury. In order to reduce the risk of accident and perform first-aid treatment quickly, it is imperative to provide workers with safety education and establish safety facilities.
Adult ; Animals ; Ankle ; Burns, Chemical ; Calcium Gluconate ; Cold Temperature ; Dyspnea ; Forearm ; Glass ; Gluconates ; Humans ; Hydrofluoric Acid ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Metals ; Mouth ; Neck ; Necrosis ; Pharyngitis ; Running ; Thigh ; Vital Signs ; Water

beta-Lapachone has drawn increasing attention as an anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer drug. However, its oral bioavailability has not been yet assessed, which might be useful to develop efficient dosage forms possibly required for non-clinical and clinical studies and future market. The aim of the present study was thus to investigate pharmacokinetic properties of beta-lapachone as well as its first-pass metabolism in the liver, and small and large intestines after oral administration to measure the absolute bioavailability in rats. A sensitive HPLC method was developed to evaluate levels of beta-lapachone in plasma and organ homogenates. The drug degradation profiles were examined in plasma to assess the stability of the drug and in liver and intestinal homogenates to evaluate first-pass metabolism. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained after oral and intravenous administration of beta-lapachone at doses of 40 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg, respectively. The measured oral bioavailability of beta-lapachone was 15.5%. The considerable degradation of beta-lapachone was seen in the organ homogenates but the drug was quite stable in plasma. In conclusion, we suggest that the fairly low oral bioavailability of beta-lapachone may be resulted from the first-pass metabolic degradation of beta-lapachone in the liver, small and large intestinal tracts and its low aqueous solubility.
Administration, Intravenous ; Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Biological Availability* ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Dosage Forms ; Intestines ; Liver ; Metabolism* ; Pharmacokinetics ; Plasma ; Rats* ; Solubility

Purpose: Physical activity (PA) is considered a potentially effective factor in the primary prevention of gastric cancer (GC). As body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) differ by sex, particularly with age, this study aimed to investigate the impact of PA on GC development, considering BMI and WC variations by sex. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the impact of PA on GC development using Cox proportional hazard regression in a cohort of 314,525 Korean individuals from the National Health Insurance Service–Health Screening database, using data from 2009–2019.Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted based on BMI and WC. The models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, BMI, and comorbidities. Results: The effect of PA on the prevention of GC development was relatively evident in males. The high PA group (metabolic equivalents of task, METs/week of 500–999) showed a lower risk of GC compared to the group with METs/week of 0 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–0.98). Especially in males with WC <90 cm and BMI <23 kg/m2 , a lower risk of GC was observed in the group with METs/week of 1–499 compared to the group with METs/week of 0 (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67–0.96). In contrast, no consistent association was observed between PA levels and risk of GC in females. Conclusions Moderate PA had a preventive effect on GC development in males, particularly in those with low BMI and WC. However, this effect was not observed in females.

Purpose: Physical activity (PA) is considered a potentially effective factor in the primary prevention of gastric cancer (GC). As body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) differ by sex, particularly with age, this study aimed to investigate the impact of PA on GC development, considering BMI and WC variations by sex. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the impact of PA on GC development using Cox proportional hazard regression in a cohort of 314,525 Korean individuals from the National Health Insurance Service–Health Screening database, using data from 2009–2019.Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted based on BMI and WC. The models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, BMI, and comorbidities. Results: The effect of PA on the prevention of GC development was relatively evident in males. The high PA group (metabolic equivalents of task, METs/week of 500–999) showed a lower risk of GC compared to the group with METs/week of 0 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–0.98). Especially in males with WC <90 cm and BMI <23 kg/m2 , a lower risk of GC was observed in the group with METs/week of 1–499 compared to the group with METs/week of 0 (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67–0.96). In contrast, no consistent association was observed between PA levels and risk of GC in females. Conclusions Moderate PA had a preventive effect on GC development in males, particularly in those with low BMI and WC. However, this effect was not observed in females.

Purpose: Physical activity (PA) is considered a potentially effective factor in the primary prevention of gastric cancer (GC). As body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) differ by sex, particularly with age, this study aimed to investigate the impact of PA on GC development, considering BMI and WC variations by sex. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the impact of PA on GC development using Cox proportional hazard regression in a cohort of 314,525 Korean individuals from the National Health Insurance Service–Health Screening database, using data from 2009–2019.Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted based on BMI and WC. The models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, BMI, and comorbidities. Results: The effect of PA on the prevention of GC development was relatively evident in males. The high PA group (metabolic equivalents of task, METs/week of 500–999) showed a lower risk of GC compared to the group with METs/week of 0 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–0.98). Especially in males with WC <90 cm and BMI <23 kg/m2 , a lower risk of GC was observed in the group with METs/week of 1–499 compared to the group with METs/week of 0 (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67–0.96). In contrast, no consistent association was observed between PA levels and risk of GC in females. Conclusions Moderate PA had a preventive effect on GC development in males, particularly in those with low BMI and WC. However, this effect was not observed in females.

Purpose: Intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy increases the risk of infection in patients with cancer by inducing bone marrow suppression and mucosal injury. Febrile neutropenia (FN) is the most important clinical adverse event in patients with cancer receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. To prevent FN, standard precautions including hand and respiratory hygiene are generally recommended, but the exact effect of non-pharmacologic intervention has not been clearly proven in the clinical setting. We aimed to compare the incidence of FN between the pre-coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) era vs. the postCOVID-19 era. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients with breast cancer who received an adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen containing adjuvant chemotherapy at Jeju National University Hospital. We compared the incidence of FN between the pre- and post-COVID-19 period and analyzed characteristics of the event and other clinical risk factors. Results: In total, 149 patients were enrolled, including 94 who received AC chemotherapy in the pre-COVID-19 era and 55 who received it in the post-COVID-19 era. Sixteen patients (10.7%) experienced FN. Fourteen (14.9%) and 2 events (3.6%) occurred in pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 eras, respectively. The post-COVID-19 era was the only risk factor for FN (P = 0.032). Conclusion We found an association between FN occurrence and the COVID-19 outbreak, providing indirect evidence of the importance of non-pharmacological measures to reduce FN risk in patients with breast cancer. Further research is required to confirm the standard precautions for FN prevention in patients with cancer.