Objective To investigate the effect of injection of air into the epidural space on the subarachnoid puncture during the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) .Methods Two hundred and ten ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ parturients who were at full term with a singleton fetus, aged 20-42 yr, weighing 57-82 kg (height 152-170cm) , undergoing cesarean section under CSEA, were randomly divided into 3 groups ( n = 70 each) : hanging drop technique group (group Ⅰ ) and injection of small volume of air group (group Ⅱ ) and injection of large volume of air group ( group Ⅲ ) . The epidural space was indentified using hanging drop technique in group Ⅰ and using loss of resistance to air technique in Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups. Injection of air was stopped as soon as the clear loss of resistance identified the epidural space in group Ⅱ , whereas all 4 ml of air was injected in group Ⅲ . After the epidural space was confirmed at L3,4 interspace, a 25-gauge spinal needle protruding 14 mm beyond the 18-gauge epidural needle was introduced through the epidural needle. Subarachnoid placement was confirmed by backflow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) . If no backflow of CSF was observed, the spinal needle was withdrawn and an epidural catheter was inserted through the epidural needle to perform epidural anesthesia. Successful subarachnoid puncture, failures to observe backflow of CSF and adverse reactions were recorded. Results The three groups were comparable with respect to age, height, body weight and gestation weeks. The success rate of subarachnoid puncture was 91% ,93% and 79% in Ⅰ ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups respectively, and it was significantly higher in Ⅰ and Ⅱ groups than in group Ⅲ ( P < 0.05) . There was no significant difference in the success rate of subarachnoid puncture between Ⅰand Ⅱ groups ( P > 0.05) . Bilateral segmental analgesia presented in all cases who received only epidural anesthesia after no backflow of CSF was observed, and the expected analgesia also presented in all cases in whom back flow of CSF was observed. No adverse reactions occurred. Conclusion Injection of air into the epidural space is related to the success of subarachnoid puncture during CSEA and injection of a large volume of air lowers the success rate.

Objective To compare the noxious stimulations induced by insertion of Proseai laryngeal mask airway(PLMA)and classic laryngeal mask airway(CLMA)in children.Methods Forty-seven ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ children,aged 3-12 yr and undergoing surgery under general anesthesia,were randomly divided into 2 groups:PLMA group(group P,n =23)and CLMA group(group C,n =24).General anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion(TCI)of propofol.When the effect-site concentration of propofol was equal to the plasma concentration predetermined.PLMA or CLMA insertion was attempted.The target plasma concentration of propofol was predetermined according to Dixon's up-down method,with 0.2 μg/ml as a step size.The initial target plasma concentration of propofol was 6 μg/ml and 4.4 μg/ml for groups P and C,respectively.The preedetermined target plasma concentration of propofol and the satisfaction of insertion conditions for each child were recorded.Results The 50％ effective concentration(EC50)of propofol to achieve satisfied condition of PLMA and CLMA insertion were 5.87(95％ CI,5.62-6.11)and 4.53(95％ C1,4.38-4.69)μg/nl,respectively,and the difference was significant(P ＜ 0.01).Conclusion The noxious stimulation induced by insertion of PLMA in children aged 3-12 years is stronger than that of CLMA.

Objective:To investigate the clinical value of three-dimensional (3D) visualization technology in the precise drainage through endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:Clinical data of 42 patients with highly suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent ERBD in Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital from September 2019 to August 2022 were retrospectively collected. Twenty patients underwent 3D biliary tract reconstruction before surgery (the reconstruction group) and 22 others did not undergo 3D biliary tract reconstruction before surgery (the non-reconstruction group). The surgery time, X-ray exposure time, the technical success rate, the clinical success rate, incidence of postoperative complications, recent and short-term endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) reintervention rate of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data between the two groups ( P>0.05). ERBD was conducted successfully in all 42 patients. The operation time in the reconstruction group [35.00 (25.00, 57.50) min] was significantly shorter than that in the non-reconstruction group [60.00 (33.75, 60.00) min] with significant difference ( Z=-2.251, P=0.024). There was no significant difference in the X-ray exposure time between the two groups [10.00 (5.00, 12.00) min VS 10.55 (9.50, 17.50) min, Z=-1.552, P=0.121]. The technical success rates of both groups were 100.0%, and the clinical success rate of the reconstruction group was higher than that of the non-reconstruction group [70.0% (14/20) VS 31.8% (7/22)] with significant difference ( χ 2=6.109, P=0.013). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups [20.0% (4/20) VS 22.7% (5/22), χ 2=0.141, P=0.708]. All patients were followed up for 6 months after the procedure. The median survival time was 3.91 months in the reconstruction group and 2.78 months in the non-reconstruction group. There was no ERCP intervention in the reconstruction group within 2 weeks after the procedure, while 4 cases (18.2%) in the non-reconstruction group received 6 ERCP interventions due to cholangitis and postoperative pancreatitis. Within 2 weeks to 3 months, 2 patients (10.0%) in the reconstruction group received 4 ERCP interventions for cholangitis, and 2 patients (9.1%) in the non-reconstruction group received 3 ERCP interventions for cholangitis. There was no significant difference in recent ( χ 2=2.183, P=0.140) or short-term ( χ 2=0.000, P=1.000) ERCP reintervention rate between the reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group. Conclusion:3D visualization biliary duct reconstruction technology can measure the volume of liver drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, shorten the operation time and improve the clinical success rate through precise preoperative planning, which is worth of promotion.

Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis is a zoonotic parasitic disease caused by echinococcus multilocularis infection. The growth pattern of the lesions of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis is similar to that of liver malignant tumor showing invasive growth. Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis can not only directly invade the adjacent tissue structure, but also metastasize through the lymphatic tracts and blood vessels. Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis with intraperitoneal implantable metastasis is extremely rare. The authors introduce the diagnosis and treatment of 1 patient who had hepatic alveolar echinococcosis with intraperitoneal implantable metastasis.

As the National Health Commission changes the management of novel corona virus infection, the situation and preventive policies for controlling the epidemic have also entered a new stage in China. Perioperative care strategies for orthopedic trauma such as designated isolation and nucleic acid test screening have also been adjusted in the new stage. Based on the perioperative work experiences in the new stage of epidemic from the frontline anti-epidemic staff of orthopedics in domestic hospitals and combined with the literature and relevant evidence-based medical data in perioperative care of orthopedic trauma patients under the current anti-epidemic policies at home and abroad, Chinese Orthopedic Association and Chinese Society of Traumatology organized relevant experts to formulate the Guideline for clinical perioperative care of orthopedic trauma patients in the new stage of novel corona virus infection ( version 2023). The guideline summarized 16 recommendations from the aspects of preoperative diagnosis and treatment, infection prevention, emergency operation and postoperative management to systematically standardize the perioperative clinical pathways, diagnosis and treatment processes of orthopedic trauma in the new stage of novel corona virus infection, so as to provide a guidance and reference for hospitals at all levels to carry out relevant work in current epidemic control policies.