1.Professor ZHENG Kuishan's experience in the clinical treatment of bi syndrome with acupuncture and moxibustion.
Baohu LIU ; Jiatai ZHENG ; Yongming GUO
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2015;35(6):600-602
Professor ZHENG Kuishan has been engaged in the education and clinical practice of acupuncture and moxibustion for over 60 years. Professor ZHENG is strict in scholarly research and exquisite in medical techniques and he is good at treatment of bi syndrome induced by invasion of wind, cold and damp with warming and, promoting therapy. He emphasizes on syndrome differentiation and acupoint combination and selects the accurate manipulations. Not only are the symptoms relieved apparently, but also the body state is improved. As a result, the primary and secondary are treated simultaneously. In the paper, professor ZHENG's experience is introduced in the treatment of bi syndrome in the aspects of theory, method, formula, acupoint and technique. And his clinical therapeutic approaches have been deeply analyzed.
Acupuncture Points
;
Acupuncture Therapy
;
history
;
methods
;
China
;
History, 20th Century
;
History, 21st Century
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Moxibustion
;
history
;
methods
2.Research Progress of the Modern Evaluation Methods of De Qi Sensation in Acupuncture and Moxibustion
Yan LIU ; Jiatai ZHENG ; Bo CHEN ; Yongming GUO ; Yi GUO
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2016;35(10):1147-1150
Objective To introduce the research progress of the modern methods in evaluating de qi sensation in acupuncture and moxibustion, and to analyze the current research situation and major problems. Method The objective evaluation methods majorly used to estimate qi sensation were summarized. Result The currently used evaluation methods basically include scales and cerebral function imaging, while the rest methods are still in the beginning stage. Conclusion As a subjective feeling, de qi sensation is difficult to determine and quantify objectively, and there lacks an objective standard. The study on the mechanism of de qi sensation is relatively insufficient and superficial.
3.Analysis on the factors that cause the difference of acupoints synergy effect.
Jiatai ZHENG ; Bo CHEN ; Yongming GUO ; Yi GUO
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2015;35(7):719-722
Based on traditional acupuncture theory and modern researches, the factors that cause the difference of acupoints synergy effect are summarized and analyzed. It is found that the factors include the specificity of acupoint, the interaction of acupoints, the pathway of acupuncture signal, the body condition level, acupuncture manipulation, etc. It is believed that the specificity of acupoint is the key factor to determine the difference of acupoints synergy effect. Interaction of acupoints may be related to the pathway of selected acupuncture signal, which is an important factor in difference of acupoints synergy effect. The body condition level and acupuncture manipulation are internal and external factor to influence acupoints synergy effect, respectively.
Acupuncture Points
;
Acupuncture Therapy
;
instrumentation
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Meridians
;
Signal Transduction
;
Treatment Outcome
4.A randomized, controlled clinical trial on meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial infections.
Fang HOU ; Jiatai LI ; Guoping WU ; Bo ZHENG ; Yifang CHEN ; Junming GU ; Huiling WANG ; Li HUO ; Xin XUE ; Changxu JIA ; Yonghong YIN ; Xiaofeng TIAN ; Shuangyi REN
Chinese Medical Journal 2002;115(12):1849-1854
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem in Chinese patients, we conducted a study for the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections and other infections.
METHODSA total of 182 hospitalized patients were enrolled in the study. 90 patients received 500 mg meropenem every 12 hours (or 1 g every 12 hours if necessary) and 92 patients received imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg every 12 hours (or 1 g every 12 hours if necessary) by intravenous infusion. The duration of treatment was 7 - 14 days for both groups.
RESULTSSeventy of 90 cases receiving meropenem and 70 of 92 cases receiving imipenem/cilastatin were assessable for clinical efficacy. The overall efficacy rates were 90% for the meropenem group and 87% for the imipenem/cilastatin group, and the bacterial eradication rates were 86% in both groups. 93 (76%) of 123 strains isolated from patients produced beta-lactamases. Adverse drug reactions were evaluated in 72 cases in the meropenem group and 70 cases in the imipenem/cilastatin group. The adverse drug reaction rates were 9.7% and 8.6%, respectively. The results showed that there were no statistical differences between these two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONMeropenem is effective and safe for the treatment of bacterial infections caused mainly by beta-lactamase-producing strains.
Adult ; Aged ; Alanine Transaminase ; blood ; Aspartate Aminotransferases ; blood ; Cilastatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Imipenem ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Respiratory Tract Infections ; drug therapy ; Thienamycins ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Urinary Tract Infections ; drug therapy