Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ( ERCP ) in the treatment of patients with biliary and pancreatic diseases after Billroth Ⅱ gastrectomy. Methods Clinical data of 178 patients with biliary and pancreatic diseases undergoing 237 times of ERCP at the digestive endoscopy center in Changhai Hospital from January 2011 to December 2016 were retrospectively collected. The success rate of procedures and related complications were summed up. Results Among 178 patients undergoing 237 times of ERCP, the successful intubation rate of the endoscope to reach the duodenal papilla was 83. 5％ ( 198/237 ) . The success rate of selective cannulation and completing the expected intervention were 91. 4％ ( 181/198 ) and 98. 9％ ( 179/181 ) , respectively. The total success rate of ERCP was 75. 5％ (179/237), which had an increasing trend with time. The total success rate of ERCP in patients with common bile duct stone was 85. 2％ ( 127/149) , and the stone retrieval rate during the first session was 56. 7％ (72/127). The ERCP-related complication rate was 14. 3％ ( 34/237 ) , with 1. 7％ ( 4/237 ) perforation, 1. 3％ ( 3/237 ) bleeding, 3. 4％ ( 8/237 ) pancreatitis, and 8. 0％ ( 19/237 ) asymptomatic hyperamylasemia. One patient with perforation and 2 patients with severe pancreatitis died of septic shock and multiple organ failure ( 1. 3％, 3/237 ) . Most ERCP-related complications were improved by conservative treatment or second endoscopic intervention ( 91. 2％, 31/34 ) . Conclusion ERCP is effective and safe in the treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases in patients with prior Billroth Ⅱ gastrectomy. With the development of endoscopic techniques and experience accumulation of endoscopists, the success rate of intubation, selective cannulation and therapeutic intervention can be close to those of patients with normal anatomy, and the incidence of related complications is low.

Objective To investigate factors affecting ampullary access of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients undergoing Billroth Ⅱ gastrectomy.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on data of 261 patients with Billroth Ⅱ gastrectomy who underwent ERCP at Changhai Hospital from January 2008 to December 2017.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the potential factors affecting successful ampullary access,and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the predictive ability of potential factors.Results A total of 345 ERCP sessions were collected.The successful ampullary access and cannulation rate were 82.3％ (284/345) and 89.1％ (253/284),respectively.The main reasons for ERCP procedural failure were unable to reach the duodenal blind end and find the papilla (66.3％,61/92) and failure of selective cannulation (33.7％,31/92).The ERCP-related complication rate was 14.2％ (49/345),with post-ERCP pancreatitis rate was 3.2％ (11/345).Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the first ERCP attempt (OR=7.717,95％CI:2.581-23.068.P＜0.001),with Braun anastomosis (OR =8.737,95％CI:2.479-30.797,P =0.001),and no cap-assisted forward-viewing gastroscope (OR =2.774,95％ CI:1.283-5.997,P=0.009) were independent risk factors for failure of ampullary access.According to the B value of each risk factor in logistic regression analysis,that is,no cap-assisted as 1 point,the first ERCP attempt as 2 points,and Braun anastomosis as 2 points,the area under ROC curve was 0.773.When the cut-off point was 2.5,the sensitivity and specificity were 75.0％ and 70.8％,respectively.Conclusion The first ERCP attempt,with Braun anastomosis,and no cap-assisted forward-viewing gastroscope are risk factors for failure of ampullary access of ERCP in Billroth Ⅱ gastrectomy patients.Early identification of high-risk patients may help to improve the success rate of ampullary access.

Recently， the International Association of Pancreatology published a revised edition of the guidelines for the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm （IPMN） of the pancreas. The guidelines mainly focus on five topics， i.e.， revision of “high-risk stigmata” and “worrisome features”， surveillance of unresected IPMN， surveillance after resection of IPMN， revision of pathological aspects， and research on molecular markers in cyst fluid， in order to provide the best evidence-based reference for clinical practice. This article makes an excerpt of the key points in the guidelines.