Objective: To analyze the epidemiological characteristics and related factors of obesity in children aged 3-6 years old in Hebei Province, and to provide a reference for childhood obesity prevention and control strategies. Methods: A total of 6 034 children aged 3-6 years were randomly selected from 11 cities in Hebei Province for physical examination and questionnaire survey. Results: The prevalence of obesity in 3-6 year old boys and girls in Hebei Province were 23.00% and 17.48 %, which differed significantly ( χ 2=28.51, P <0.01); The prevalence of obesity was higher in rural areas and children with ethnic minorities ( 20.06 %, 21.68%) than that of urban are and Han children (19.97%, 20.09%), with no significant differences ( χ 2= 0.01 , 0.78, P ＞0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that boys( OR =1.45), birth weight no less than 4 000 g ( OR =2.80), high fat food consumption at least 3 times a week （OR =1.64), carbonated drinks consumption at least 3 times a week ( OR =4.71), insufficient fruits and vegetables consumption ( OR =1.22), physical activities less than 2 hours per day ( OR =1.82), maternal obesity ( OR =2.0), and lack of physical exercise of fathers ( OR =1.95) were significantly associated with higher risk for obesity among young children in Hebei Province ( P <0.01). Conclusion The prevalence of obesity among children aged 3-6 years in Hebei Province is at a high level at present. Many factors contribute to this epidemic such as genetics, poor diet and living habits. Promotion of healthy eating and lifestyle, as well as dissemination of reliable knowledge about childhood obesity are greatly needed.

Objective To investigate the distribution and resistance profile of bacterial isolates in Shanghai Children's Hospital. Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility of all isolates was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to 2016 CLSI standard. The data were analyzed by WHONET 5.6 software. Results A total of 23 259 non-duplicate strains were isolated from 2011 to 2016, including 10 885(46.8％)gram-postive cocci and 12 374(53.2％)gram-negative bacilli. The average prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus(MRSA)and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus(MRCNS)was 35.8％ and 82.2％, respectively. The prevalence of MRSA rose from 27.4％ in 2011 to 42.9％ in 2016. The resistance rate of MRSA and MRCNS strains were significantly higher than methicillin sensitive strains. The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecium strains was significant higher than Enterococcus faecalis. The prevalence of non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae was 31.2％(908). No gram-positive strain was resistant to vancomycin or linezolid. The prevalence of carbapenem resistance increased in gram-negative strains. The resistance rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae to imipenem and meropenem rose from 3.1％ and 4.8 ％ in 2011 to 28.7％ and 37.4％ in 2016, respectively.The rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to imipenem and meropenem rose from 13.8％ and 16.5％ in 2011 to 18.8％ and 19.4％ in 2016, respectively, while Acinetobacter baumannii showed resistance rate of 38.3％ and 39.9 ％ in 2011 to 68.4％ and 69.7％ in 2016. Conclusions Increasing prevalence of MRSA, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, extensively drug-resistant A.baumannii has become a concern in clinical practice. Therefore, antimicrobial resistance surveillance should be highly strengthened in children's hospital.

Objective: To investigate the role of short-term starvation (STS) in alleviating hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice and possible mechanism of action. Methods: Wild-type male C57BL/6 mice aged 8 weeks were randomly divided into 75% hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury group (IR group), STS+75% hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury group (STS group), and sirtinol+STS+75% hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury group (SIR group), using a random number table, and sham-operation groups (IR-Sham group, STS-Sham group, and SIR-Sham group) were also established. The serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured, and the histomorphological changes of the liver were observed, as well as the expression of Sirt1, LC3B, and P62 proteins in liver tissue and the results of LC3B fluorescence staining. An analysis of variance was used for comparison of data between multiple groups, and the t-test was used for comparison of data between two groups. Results: Compared with the IR group, the STS group had significant reductions in the serum levels of ALT (3 152.7 ± 735.6 U/L vs 8 414.2 ± 1 052.2 U/L, P < 0.01) and AST (3 577.0 ± 714.0 U/L vs 10 845.8 ± 1 145.7 U/L, P < 0.01) and significant alleviation of liver pathological injury (Suzuki score: 1.50±0.55 vs 3.50±0.55, P < 0.01). Compared with the STS group, the SIR group had significant increases in the serum levels of ALT (7 002.7 ± 1 485.2 U/L vs 3 152.7 ± 735.6 U/L, P < 0.01) and AST (8 980.7 ± 1 739.1 U/L vs 3 577.0 ± 714.0 U/L, P < 0.01) and significant exacerbation of liver pathological injury (Suzuki score: 3.33 ± 0.52 vs 1.50 ± 0.55, P < 0.01). Compared with the IR group and the IR-Sham group, the STS group and the STS-Sham group had significant increases in the mRNA and protein expression of Sirt1 and the protein expression of LC3B and a significant reduction in the protein expression of P62, as well as a significant increase in the percentage of LC3B-positive cells in liver tissue (22.83% ± 5.19% / 22.17% ± 4.83% vs 10.16% ± 3.06% / 10.83% ± 1.94%, both P < 0.01). Compared with the STS group and the STS-Sham group, the SIR group and the SIR-Sham group had significant reductions in the expression of Sirt1 and LC3B proteins and a significant increase in the expression of P62 protein, as well as a significant reduction in the percentage of LC3B-positive cells in liver tissue (11.83% ± 9.24% / 14.67% ± 4.68% vs 22.83% ± 5.19% / 22.17% ± 4.83%, both P < 0.01). Conclusion STS can effectively alleviate hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, and its protective effect may be associated with increasing the expression of Sirt1, inducing and promoting hepatocyte autophagy, and reducing hepatocyte death.

Objective To investigate the features of peripheral nerve injuries in workers exposed to vibration.Methods A total of 197 male workers [median age:34 years (21-50 years);median working years of vibration exposure:7.3 years (1-20 years)] engaged in grinding in an enterprise were enrolled.Their clinical data and electromyography results were analyzed to investigate the features of peripheral nerve impairment.Results Of all workers,96 (48.73％) had abnormal electromyography results.Of all workers,88 (44.7％) had simple mild median nerve injury in the wrist,who accounted for 91.7％(88/96) of all workers with abnormal electromyography results.Six workers had ulnar nerve injury,superficial radial nerve injury,or/and superficial peroneal nerve injury and accounted for 6.3％ of all workers with abnormal electromyography results.Of all workers,88 had a reduced amplitude of median nerve sensory transduction,and 28 had slowed median nerve sensory transduction.A total of 46 workers were diagnosed with occupational hand-arm vibration disease and hospitalized for treatment.They were followed up for more than 4 months after leaving their jobs,and most of them showed improvements in neural electromyography results and returned to a normal state.Conclusion Workers exposed to vibration have a high incidence rate of nerve injury in the hand,mainly sensory function impairment at the distal end of the median nerve,and all injuries are mild peripheral nerve injuries.After leaving the vibration job and being treated,most workers can achieve improvements and return to a normal state.

Objective To investigate the features of peripheral nerve injuries in workers exposed to vibration.Methods A total of 197 male workers [median age:34 years (21-50 years);median working years of vibration exposure:7.3 years (1-20 years)] engaged in grinding in an enterprise were enrolled.Their clinical data and electromyography results were analyzed to investigate the features of peripheral nerve impairment.Results Of all workers,96 (48.73％) had abnormal electromyography results.Of all workers,88 (44.7％) had simple mild median nerve injury in the wrist,who accounted for 91.7％(88/96) of all workers with abnormal electromyography results.Six workers had ulnar nerve injury,superficial radial nerve injury,or/and superficial peroneal nerve injury and accounted for 6.3％ of all workers with abnormal electromyography results.Of all workers,88 had a reduced amplitude of median nerve sensory transduction,and 28 had slowed median nerve sensory transduction.A total of 46 workers were diagnosed with occupational hand-arm vibration disease and hospitalized for treatment.They were followed up for more than 4 months after leaving their jobs,and most of them showed improvements in neural electromyography results and returned to a normal state.Conclusion Workers exposed to vibration have a high incidence rate of nerve injury in the hand,mainly sensory function impairment at the distal end of the median nerve,and all injuries are mild peripheral nerve injuries.After leaving the vibration job and being treated,most workers can achieve improvements and return to a normal state.

Background and objective Gemcitabine and taxanes are effective agents commonly used in advanced squamous lung cancer. hTe best treatment sequence, however, is unclear to our knowledge. So we conducted this retrospective study in order to compare the effcacy and toxicities of ifrst-line Gemcitabine+/-platinum followed by second-line taxanes+/-platinum with the reverse sequence. Methods We totally analyzed 105 patients with stage IIIb-IV squamous lung cancer in our retrospective study. hTere were 49 patients receiving gemcitabine+/-platinum ifrst-line followed by taxanes+/-plati-num second-line (G-T group), and 56 patients receiving taxanes+/-platinum ifrst-line followed by gemcitabine+/-platinum second-line (T-G group). hTe primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicities. Results hTe me-dian OS were 18.5 mo in G-T group and 19.0 mo in T-G group (P=0.520). hTe median PFS1 was 5.0 mo and 4.0 mo with ifrst-line gemcitabine+/-platinum and taxanes+/-platinum, respectively (P=0.584). hTe median PFS2 was 2.7 mo and 2.5 mo with second-line gemcitabine+/-platinum and taxanes+/-platinum (P=0.432). hTe ORR1 of G-T group and T-G group were 36.73%and 33.92%(P=0.577), and DCR1 were 79.59%and 89.29%(P=0.186);the ORR2 of G-T group and T-G group were 4.08%and 5.36%(P=0.085), and DCR2 were 51.02%and 66.07%, respectively (P=0.118). Hematologic toxicities was more frequent in G-T group, the patients experienced more grade 3-4 lower hemoglobin (P=0.027) and thrombocytopenia (P=0.002). Conclusion hTe effcacy of ifrst line gemcitabine+/-platinum followed by second line taxanes+/-platinum and the reverse sequence was similar, and the toxicities was tolerable. Both sequential patterns were effective in advanced squamous lung cancer.

Background and objective Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease for which the mainstay of treatment is cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite good initial responses most patients will relapse or progress atfer the ifrst-line therapy. hTe evidence of a beneift from second-line chemotherapy is limited in patients with relapsed/advanced SCLC. Some drugs are recommended by guidelines, but more regimens are formulated based on experience in clinical. So we conducted this retrospective study in order to compare the effcacy and safety of different second-line treatment regimens. Methods We totally analyzed 309 patients received second-line treatment in our retrospective study. 157 patients received best supportive care (BSC), and the rest 152 patients received second-line chemotherapy. hTe Kaplan-Meier method survival curves and Log-rank test were used to analysis the differences among different groups. hTe endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Patients administered second-line chemotherapy lived signiifcantly longer, with a total OS from ifrst-line therapy of 11.5 mo compared to 6.0 mo in patients with best supportive care alone (P<0.001), and the ORR, DCR, PFS and OS of the former (including the sensitive dis-ease and resistance/refractory disease patients) were obviously better than that of the latter. hTe ORR and DCR of the patients who received second-line chemotherapy is 39.5%and 59.2%, respectively. hTe median PFS and OS from second-line chemo-therapy were 3.3 mo and 5.3 mo. hTe patients who received second-line chemotherapy were divided by types of second-line regimens. hTe sensitive disease patients were from group A (VP-16-based rechallenge) and group B1 (CPT-11-based regimen). hTe ORR of the two groups were 48.6%and 35.3%, and the DCR were 68.6%and 58.8%, respectively. hTere was no statistically signiifcant difference (P=0.264;P=0.400). hTe median PFS from second-line chemotherapy of the two groups were 4.0 mo and 3.0 mo, and the second-line median OS were 6.5 mo and 4.5 mo. hTere was no statistic difference (P=0.432;P=0.508). hTe resistance/refractory disease patients were divided into group B2 (CPT-11-based regimen), group C (PTX/DXL-based regi-men) and group D (TPT-based regimen). hTere was no statistic difference in second-line ORR, DCR and median PFS among the three groups (P value is 0.521, 0.528 and 0.775, respectively);hTe median OS from second-line chemotherapy of the group D is longer than that of group B2 and group C, with statistical difference (P=0.043;P=0.030). hTe differences of grade III-IV hematologic toxicities among the four subgroups were not statistically different. hTe incidence of diarrhea in non-hematologic toxicities in patients who received irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy was higher than other three subgroups (P=0.029). Conclusion Patients who progressed atfer the completion of ifrst-line chemotherapy can gain survival beneift. hTe response and the PFS of the different second-line chemotherapies were similar. hTe patients who received the TPT-based regimen may gain longer overall survival than other resistance/refractory disease patients.

Objective:To summarize the experience of surgical treatment of primary liver cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 10 966 surgically managed cases with primary liver cancer, from January 1986 to December 2019 at Hepatobiliary Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed. The life table method was used to calculate the survival rate and postoperative recurrence rate. Log‐rank test was used to compare the survival process of different groups, and the Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis. In addition, 2 884 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) with more detailed follow‐up data from 2009 to 2019 were selected for survival analysis. Among 2 549 patients treated with hepatectomy, there were 2 107 males and 442 females, with an age of (56.6±11.1) years (range: 20 to 86 years). Among 335 patients treated with liver transplantation, there were 292 males and 43 females, with an age of (51.0±9.7) years (range: 21 to 73 years). The outcomes of hepatectomy versus liver transplantation, anatomic versus non-anatomic hepatectomy were compared, respectively.Results:Of the 10 966 patients with primary liver cancer, 10 331 patients underwent hepatectomy and 635 patients underwent liver transplantation. Patients with liver resection were categorized into three groups: 1986－1995(712 cases), 1996－2008(3 988 cases), 2009?2019(5 631 cases). The 5‐year overall survival rate was 32.9% in the first group(1986－1995). The 5‐year overall survival rate of resected primary liver cancer was 51.7% in the third group(2009‐2019), among which the 5‐year overal survival rates of hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and mixed liver cancer were 57.4%, 26.6% and 50.6%, respectively. Further analysis was performed on 2 549 HCC patients with primary hepatectomy. The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates were 88.1%, 71.9%, 60.0%, and 41.0%, respectively, and the perioperative mortality rate was 1.0%. Two hundred and forty‐seven HCC patients underwent primary liver transplantation, with 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates of 84.0%, 64.8%, 61.9%, and 57.6%, respectively. Eighty‐eight HCC patients underwent salvage liver transplantation, with the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates of 86.8%, 65.2%, 52.5%, and 52.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival rates between the two groups with liver transplantation ( P>0.05). Comparing the overall survival rates and recurrence rates of primary hepatectomy (2 549 cases) with primary liver transplantation (247 cases), the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates in patients within Milan criteria treated with hepatectomy and transplantation were 96.3%, 87.1%, 76.9%, 54.7%, and 95.4%, 79.4%, 77.4%, 71.7%, respectively ( P=0.754). The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐year recurrence rates were 16.3%, 35.9%, 47.6% and 8.1%, 11.7%, 13.9%, respectively( P<0.01). The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, 10‐year overall survival rates in patients with no large vessels invasion beyond the Milan criteria treated with liver resection and transplantation were 87.2%, 65.9%, 53.0%, 33.0% and 87.6%, 71.8%, 71.8%, 69.3%, respectively( P=0.003); the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐year recurrence rate were 39.2%, 57.8%, 69.7% and 29.7%, 36.7%, 36.7%, respectively ( P<0.01). The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates in patients with large vessels invasion treated with liver resection and transplantation were 62.1%, 36.1%, 22.2%, 15.0% and 62.9%, 31.8%,19.9%, 0, respectively ( P=0.387); the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐year recurrence rates were 61.5%, 74.7%, 80.8% and 59.7%, 82.9%, 87.2%, respectively( P=0.909). Independent prognostic factors for both overall survival and recurrence‐free survival rates of HCC patients treated with liver resection included gender, neoadjuvant therapy, symptoms, AST, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, tumor number, tumor size, cirrhosis, macrovascular invasion, microvascular invasion, and pathological differentiation. Propensity score matching analysis of 443 pairs further showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival rate between anatomical liver resection and non‐anatomical liver resection( P=0.895), but the recurrence rate of non‐anatomical liver resection was higher than that of anatomical liver resection( P=0.035). Conclusions:In the past decade, the overall survival rate of HCC undergoing surgical treatment is significantly higher than before. For HCC patients with good liver function reservation, surgical resection can be performed first, and salvage liver transplantation can be performed after recurrence. The effect of salvage liver transplantation is comparable to that of primary liver transplantation. As for the choice of liver resection approaches, non‐anatomical resection can reserve more liver tissue and can be selected as long as the negative margin is guaranteed.

Objective:To summarize the experience of surgical treatment of primary liver cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 10 966 surgically managed cases with primary liver cancer, from January 1986 to December 2019 at Hepatobiliary Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed. The life table method was used to calculate the survival rate and postoperative recurrence rate. Log‐rank test was used to compare the survival process of different groups, and the Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis. In addition, 2 884 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) with more detailed follow‐up data from 2009 to 2019 were selected for survival analysis. Among 2 549 patients treated with hepatectomy, there were 2 107 males and 442 females, with an age of (56.6±11.1) years (range: 20 to 86 years). Among 335 patients treated with liver transplantation, there were 292 males and 43 females, with an age of (51.0±9.7) years (range: 21 to 73 years). The outcomes of hepatectomy versus liver transplantation, anatomic versus non-anatomic hepatectomy were compared, respectively.Results:Of the 10 966 patients with primary liver cancer, 10 331 patients underwent hepatectomy and 635 patients underwent liver transplantation. Patients with liver resection were categorized into three groups: 1986－1995(712 cases), 1996－2008(3 988 cases), 2009?2019(5 631 cases). The 5‐year overall survival rate was 32.9% in the first group(1986－1995). The 5‐year overall survival rate of resected primary liver cancer was 51.7% in the third group(2009‐2019), among which the 5‐year overal survival rates of hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and mixed liver cancer were 57.4%, 26.6% and 50.6%, respectively. Further analysis was performed on 2 549 HCC patients with primary hepatectomy. The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates were 88.1%, 71.9%, 60.0%, and 41.0%, respectively, and the perioperative mortality rate was 1.0%. Two hundred and forty‐seven HCC patients underwent primary liver transplantation, with 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates of 84.0%, 64.8%, 61.9%, and 57.6%, respectively. Eighty‐eight HCC patients underwent salvage liver transplantation, with the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates of 86.8%, 65.2%, 52.5%, and 52.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival rates between the two groups with liver transplantation ( P>0.05). Comparing the overall survival rates and recurrence rates of primary hepatectomy (2 549 cases) with primary liver transplantation (247 cases), the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates in patients within Milan criteria treated with hepatectomy and transplantation were 96.3%, 87.1%, 76.9%, 54.7%, and 95.4%, 79.4%, 77.4%, 71.7%, respectively ( P=0.754). The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐year recurrence rates were 16.3%, 35.9%, 47.6% and 8.1%, 11.7%, 13.9%, respectively( P<0.01). The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, 10‐year overall survival rates in patients with no large vessels invasion beyond the Milan criteria treated with liver resection and transplantation were 87.2%, 65.9%, 53.0%, 33.0% and 87.6%, 71.8%, 71.8%, 69.3%, respectively( P=0.003); the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐year recurrence rate were 39.2%, 57.8%, 69.7% and 29.7%, 36.7%, 36.7%, respectively ( P<0.01). The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates in patients with large vessels invasion treated with liver resection and transplantation were 62.1%, 36.1%, 22.2%, 15.0% and 62.9%, 31.8%,19.9%, 0, respectively ( P=0.387); the 1‐, 3‐, 5‐year recurrence rates were 61.5%, 74.7%, 80.8% and 59.7%, 82.9%, 87.2%, respectively( P=0.909). Independent prognostic factors for both overall survival and recurrence‐free survival rates of HCC patients treated with liver resection included gender, neoadjuvant therapy, symptoms, AST, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, tumor number, tumor size, cirrhosis, macrovascular invasion, microvascular invasion, and pathological differentiation. Propensity score matching analysis of 443 pairs further showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival rate between anatomical liver resection and non‐anatomical liver resection( P=0.895), but the recurrence rate of non‐anatomical liver resection was higher than that of anatomical liver resection( P=0.035). Conclusions:In the past decade, the overall survival rate of HCC undergoing surgical treatment is significantly higher than before. For HCC patients with good liver function reservation, surgical resection can be performed first, and salvage liver transplantation can be performed after recurrence. The effect of salvage liver transplantation is comparable to that of primary liver transplantation. As for the choice of liver resection approaches, non‐anatomical resection can reserve more liver tissue and can be selected as long as the negative margin is guaranteed.

Objective: To assess application of reconstruction of retrohepatic inferior vena cava using artificial blood vessel in right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond Milan Criteria. Methods: The clinical data of 9 HCC patients who underwent right lobe liver transplantation after reconstruction of retrohepatic inferior vena cava using artificial blood vessel between June 2015 and Nov 2016 at Liver Transplantation Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. The liver of the patients was removed with retrohepatic inferior vena cava, and then the right donor graft was implanted by conventional orthotopic liver transplantation. Results: All 9 liver transplantations were performed successfully. The time of reconstruction of hepatic venous outflow of the donor graft was (22.6±3.0) min, anhepatic time was (45.0±7.1) min, and total operation time was (321.9±52.5) min. All patients recovered uneventfully, ICU and hospital stay day were (1.2±0.4) days and (18.4±3.0) days. 2 patients suffered from thrombosis of artificial blood vessel, one recovered after conservative treatment and another was treated by placement of vein stent. No abdominal/pulmonary infection and non-artificial blood vascular complications were found, and none died in perioperative period. Postoperative pathological results showed that all patients were hepatocellular carcinomas and vascular tumor thrombosis was found in 5 cases. All patients were follow up, 1 patient died of pulmonary and brain metastasis 10 months after operation. One patient survived with local recurrence of tumor in liver. The other patients had no tumor recurrence and metastasis. Conclusion Replacement of retrohepatic inferior vena cava using artificial blood vessel in right lobe living donor liver transplantation is safe and feasible in the treatment of HCC beyond Milan Criteria, and might improve the resection rate of diseased liver and the prognosis of HCC patients after living donor liver transplantation.