Objective:To explore clinical application value of immediate breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis after nipple areolar sparing mastectomy for breast cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 30 breast cancer patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction with the silicone prosthesis after nipple areolar sparing mastectomy from January 2016 to January 2018 were collected. In the observation group, 15 patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction with the silicone prosthesis after nipple areolar sparing mastectomy. In the control group, 15 patients underwent conventional modified radical mastectomy only. The differences of operation indicator and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared, and the postoperative cosmetic effects were evaluated.Results:The patients successfully completed prosthetic breast reconstruction in the observation group. The surgical time and indwelling time of the drainage tube in the observation group were both increased compared with the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=118.8 and t=23.9, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the complications of postoperative flap necrosis, subcutaneous hematoma, intraoperative infection and incision dehiscence ( P>0.05). The total complications rate of the observation group was 40%, compared with the control group (20%), there were not statistically significant differences ( P>0.05). The postoperative aesthetic effect evaluation showed that the reconstructed breast was full in shape and basically symmetrical to the contralateral side, with an excellent and good rate of 83.3%. The patients were satisfied with the appearance of the breast. All patients were followed up for 12 to 36 months with the average time of 24 months, and local recurrence and distant metastasis were not observed. Conclusions:In the modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer with preserved nipple and areola, the immediate application of silicone prosthesis for breast reconstruction has the advantages of less trauma, faster postoperative recovery and better cosmetic effect, which is worthy of clinical application.

Objective:To explore the clinical application of lateral thoracic artery perforator flap in repairing local defect after breast conserving surgery.Methods:The clinical data of 48 breast cancer patients planned to finish breast conserving surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into plastic breast-conserving group and routine breast conserving group. In the plastic breast-conserving group, 24 patients local defect repaired with the lateral thoracic artery perforator flap. In the routine breast conserving group, 24 patients local defect repaired with the fascial flap around the cutting edge. The operation related indexes and cosmetic effect from two groups were compared.Results:Both groups of patients successfully completed breast conserving surgery. The plastic breast-conserving group patients had significantly increased in operation time, operative blood loss, incision length and drainage tube indwelling time compared with the routine breast conserving group; the differences were statistically significant ( t=6.99, 9.37, 21.74, 8.80, P<0.05). The rate of secondary surgery enlarged was lower than fhat in the routine breast conserving group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=4.76, P<0.05). There were 3 cases in the plastic breast conserving group and 1 case in the conventional breast conserving group. The skin at the edge of the flap was ischemic necrosis in the 4 cases, which healed after dressing change and drainage, and there was no significant difference ( P>0.05). The evaluation of postoperative cosmetic effect showed that the excellent and good rate of the observation group was 91.7%, compared with the routine breast conserving group (58.3%); the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=7.11, P<0.05). All patients were followed up for average 24 months, and local recurrence and distant metastasis were not observed. Conclusions:The lateral thoracic artery perforator flap for filling local defects in the lateral quadrant or central region of breast cancer is feasible, easy to operate, hides incision scar, better cosmetic effect and worthy of clinical promotion.

Objective:To explore the effect of tumor plastic surgery in breast conserving surgery for early breast cancer.Methods:From March 2015 to March 2021, 80 female patients with breast cancer, aged 31 to 55 (43±12) years, who were admitted to the Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Chenzhou City, Hunan Province, were divided into plastic breast conserving group and conventional breast conserving group, with 40 cases in each group. The plastic surgery breast conserving group used plastic surgery techniques to repair local breast defects after surgery, while the conventional breast conserving group used fascial fat flaps around the cutting edge to repair local defects; the differences in surgical related indicators and postoperative complications were compared between two groups of patients, and the postoperative cosmetic effect was evaluated.Results:Both groups successfully completed the conservative surgery. The operation time, blood loss, and drainage tube retention time in the oncoplastic conservative surgery group were longer than those in the conventional conservative surgery group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). The 2nd cut margin expansion rate was 2.5% (1/40) in the oncoplastic conservative surgery group, which was lower than that in the conventional conservative surgery group (20%, 8/40), and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0.034). There were 3 cases of partial necrosis and 2 cases of subcutaneous fat embolism in the oncoplastic conservative surgery group after surgery, and 1 case of partial necrosis and 1 case of subcutaneous fat embolism in the conventional conservative surgery group. All of them healed after drainage and dressing changes. The postoperative aesthetic effect evaluation showed that the excellent rate in the oncoplastic conservative surgery group was 95% (38/40), and the excellent rate in the conventional conservative surgery group was 70% (28/40). The difference was statistically significant ( P=0.003). After a follow-up of 36 to 96 months, no local recurrence or distant metastasis was found in either group. Conclusions:Breast-conserving surgery can enable early breast cancer patients to achieve wider tumor margins and better aesthetic effects, with good safety and is worth clinical application.