Objective To establish mouse model of type 2 diabetes peripheral neuropathy and measure its intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD).Methods Male C57BL6 mouse were ran-domly divided into four groups:group HS (n =6):high-fat diet+single streptozotocin intraperitoneal injection (120 mg/kg);group H (n =6):high fat diet+buffer injection;group S (n =6):standard chow diet+single streptozotocin intraperitoneal injection (120 mg/kg);group C (n = 6 ):standard chow diet+buffer injection.The 24th week was the end point of the experiment,and random glucose, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR),mechanical threshold,and IENFD were measured.Results Group HS had significantly higher random glucose and HOMA-IR than other groups (P <0.01),had significantly lower mechanical threshold than other groups (P <0.05), had significantly lower IENFD than groups S and C at 24th week (P <0.05 );group H had signifi-cantly higher random glucose and HOMA-IR than group C at 24th week (P <0.01),had no signifi-cant difference in mechanical threshold compared with group S and group C,and had no significant difference in IENFD compared with group HS.Conclusion A mouse model of type 2 diabetes periph-eral neuropathy was successfully established,and the IENFD was found to be decreased significantly.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of different volume of ropivacaine for subomohyiod anterior suprascapular nerve block (aSSNB) in the patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with general anesthesia.Methods:One hundred and thirty-five patients of either sex, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery, were divided into 3 groups ( n=45 each) using a random number table method: 0.5% ropivacaine 5 ml group (L group), 10 ml group (M group), and 15 ml group (H group). Before induction, aSSNB was performed with 0.5% ropivacaine 5, 10 and 15 ml in L, M and H groups, respectively.Diaphragmatic excursion, occurrence and degree of diaphragmatic paralysis, decrease in SpO 2, dyspnea and Horner syndrome were recorded at 30 min after injection.The intraoperative consumption of remifentanil and cardiovascular events were recorded.The extubation time, length of post-anesthesia care unit stay, and duration of sensory block were recorded.Quality of Recovery-15 scale score and score for patient′s satisfaction with analgesia were recorded.The first pressing time of analgesic pump, effective pressing frequency of analgesic pump, requirement for rescue analgesia, nausea, vomiting and nerve block-related complications within 24 h after surgery were recorded. Results:Compared with group L, the incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis was significantly increased, the degree of diaphragmatic paralysis was aggravated, the first pressing time of analgesic pump and duration of sensory block were prolonged, the effective pressing times of analgesic pump was reduced, and the requirement for rescue analgesia was decreased in M and H groups, and the decrease in SpO 2 was significantly increased, and the introperative consumption of remifentanil was decreased in group H ( P<0.05). Compared with group M, the decrease in SpO 2 and incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis were significantly increased, the degree of diaphragmatic paralysis was aggravated, the first pressing time of analgesic pump and duration of sensory block were prolonged ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in the introperative consumption of remifentanil, the effective pressing times of analgesic pump or requirement for rescue analgesia in group H ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of cardiovascular events, score for patient′s satisfaction with analgesia, incidence of dyspnea and extubation time, length of post-anesthesia care unit stay, Quality of Recovery-15 sacle score, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting among three groups ( P>0.05). There were no Horner syndrome and nerve block-related complications in the three groups. Conclusions:Subomohyoid aSSNB with 0.5% ropivacaine hydrochloride 10 ml provides optimal efficacy when used for subomohyiod anterior suprascapular nerve block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with general anesthesia.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of subomohyoid anterior suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in the patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with general anesthesia.Methods:Sixty patients of either sex, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰor Ⅱ, scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery, were divided into 2 groups ( n=30 each) using a random number table method: SSNB group (S group) and interscalene brachial plexus block group (I group). Before induction, 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride 15 ml was injected between C 5-C 6 nerve roots in group I and around the anterior suprascapular nerve in group S under ultrasound guidance.Diaphragmatic excursion, occurrence and degree of diaphragmatic paralysis, decrease in SpO 2, dyspnea, Horner syndrome and sensory block in the C 5-T 1 dermatomes were assessed at 30 min after injection.The intraoperative consumption of remifentanil, extubation time, and length of post-anesthesia care unit stay were recorded.Quality of Recovery-15 score for patient′s satisfaction with analgesia, effective pressing frequency of analgesic pump, requirement for rescue analgesia, nausea and vomiting and nerve block-related complications within 24 h after surgery were recorded. Results:Compared with group I, the incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis was significantly decreased, the degree of diaphragmatic paralysis was reduced, diaphragmatic excursion was increased, the amplitude of decrease in SpO 2 was reduced, the incidence of dyspnea and Horner syndrome was decreased, extubation time was shortened ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in the incidence of sensory block in the C 5-T 1 dermatomes, intraoperative consumption of remifentanil, effective pressing frequency of analgesic pump, requirement for rescue analgesia, score for patient′s satisfaction with analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, length of post-anesthesia care unit stay, or Quality of Recovery-15 score in group S ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The subomohyoid anterior SSNB not only provides reliable perioperative analgesia, but also reduces the risk of diaphragmatic paralysis when used in the patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with general anesthesia.