1.Influence on gastrointestinal function recovery of gastric surgery treated different ways gastrointestinal decompression
China Modern Doctor 2015;(19):74-75,79
Objective To compare the effect of gastrointestinal function recovery of Gastric surgery treated Different ways Gastrointestinal decompression. Methods A total of 103 cases with gastric cancer patients were collected from May 2014 to April 2015 in our hospital for radical gastrectomy, all the patients were divided into two groups, there were 51 cases in the study group,all of them implemented no negative natural drainage decompression, there were 52 cases in the control group, all of them implemented continuous suction decompression. The postoperative gastric 3 d daily average drainage,postoperative recovery,adverse reaction rates and complication rates of two groups were com-pared. Results In the study group,the exhaust time,stomach retention time,postoperative hospital stay time were sig-nificantly shorter than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in 3d average daily gastric drainage, the overall incidence of adverse reactions and the overall incidence of complications between the study group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion After giving no negative gastric decompression better natural drainage, drainage and continuous suction decompression similar, but can promote the rehabilitation of patients,shorter hospital stay,clinical application can be in.
2.Recent efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer
China Modern Doctor 2015;(21):42-44
Objective To compare the short-term effect of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods 118 cases with colorectal cancer were selected from January 2011 to April 2012 patients in our hospital and were divided into two groups, the study group and the control group had 59 cases. The study group given laparoscopic surgery, the control group to implemented laparotomy, the clinical efficacy of two groups were compared. Results The blood loss of the study group was less than the control group, bowel function recovery time, hospital stays time were shorter than the control group, the operation time was longer than the control group, the difference was statistically sig-nificant (P<0.05). Pre-operative research, post and the total number of surgical lymph node dissection, and 3-year sur-vival rate of the study group compared with the control group had no significant difference (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications, recurrence rates of the study group were lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer is effective, the effect of the tumor and lymph node dissection similar to open surgery, laparoscopic surgery can reduce the amount of bleeding, rapid postoperative recovery, low complication rate and recurrence rates, worthy application.