Previous research on traditional Chinese medicine tongue inspection has mainly focused on its development,clinical application,and objectification,ignoring the fundamental question of "why tongue inspection is important in traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis" and neglecting the dominant role of traditional Chinese medicine brain thinking activities during diagnosis. Therefore,applying modern cognitive neuroscience technology to explore the impact of tongue inspection information on traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic thinking from an empirical research perspective may open up a new path for future tongue inspection research. This article proposes the combined application of eye tracking and event-related potential technology,drawing on the experimental paradigm of text reading inference correction in cognitive psychology,to collect eye movement and electroencephalogram data of participants induced by changes in tongue information during the reading process of traditional Chinese medicine medical records. This method can achieve synchronous observation of the focus areas and electroencephalogram signals of the subjects during the reading process,and provide cognitive scientific evidence for "why tongue inspection is important in traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis" through statistical data analysis. This research approach integrates the theories,techniques,and methods of traditional Chinese medicine and cognitive science,and is of great significance for developing cognitive thinking research in traditional Chinese medicine.

OBJECTIVE To compare the chemical components contained in Artemisiae Scopariae Herba （ASH） standard decoction and its decoction pieces， and provide foundation of their pharmacological substances. METHODS ASH standard decoction and its decoction pieces were prepared； UFLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS method was used for the detection in the negative ion mode， and the total ion chromatogram was extracted by the PeakView 1.6 software. By comparing with reference substances， literature data， and online search of compound database such as PubChem， the chemical components contained in ASH standard decoction and its decoction pieces were identified and analyzed for the differences. RESULTS A total of 125 chemical components were identified in ASH standard decoction and its decoction pieces， including 50 organic acids， 39 flavonoids， 3 coumarins， 2 amino acids， 5 lignans， and 26 others. 3-methoxy-caffeic acid-4-O- β -D-glucoside， p-hydroxybenzoic acid， caffeic acid 4-O- glucoside， spiraeoside， and phenyl β-D-glucoside in ASH standard decoction were not detected in its decoction pieces， while 6′-6′ chlorogenic acid dimer， quercetin-5-glucoside， apigenin 7-methyl ether 5-（6″-malonylglucoside）， quercetin-3-O-arabinoside， 6″-caffeoylhyperin and 6-O-caffeoyl-D-glucoside in decoction pieces were not detected in the standard decoction. CONCLUSIONS Most components in ASH decoction pieces are transferred to its standard decoction， but a few components undergo chemical reactions in whole or in part during the boiling process， transforming into other or new components in the standard decoction.