1.Component analysis of relationship between 24 hour movement behavior and physical fitness in college students
HUANG Zan, ZHOU Yulan, HE Jiabei, LIU Yanjie
Chinese Journal of School Health 2023;44(10):1550-1554
Objective:
To explore the relationship between 24 hour movement behavior and physical fitness in college students, so as to provide a reference for physical fitness interventions for college students.
Methods:
A survey was conducted from September 23 to November 12, 2022, involving 342 college students selected from one comprehensive college among Shanghai City, Hubei Province and Zhejiang Province. Accelerometers were used to measure 24 hour movement behavior, and programs specified in the National Physical Fitness Standards for Students (2014 revision) were used to evaluate physical fitness. Compositional linear regression was used to analyze the association between 24 hour movement behavior and physical fitness. The effects of compositional isotemporal substitution of 24 hour movement behavior on physical fitness were also examined.
Results:
The geometric means for sleep, sedentary behavior, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were 515.89, 678.88 , 196.30, 48.92 min/d, respectively, and the comprehensive physical fitness score was (73.09±8.55). The proportion of participants who passed the fitness test was 72.51%. Overall, 20.76% had excellent or good scores, whereas 6.73% failed. Compositional linear regression indicated that physical fitness was significantly positively associated with MVPA ( β =2.55) and LPA ( β = 5.88 )( P <0.05), but no significantly associated with sleep ( β =-5.18) and sedentary behavior ( β =-3.24)( P >0.05). Isotemporal substitution indicated that reallocation of 15 minutes from sleep and sedentary behavior to MVPA resulted in a 0.71 and 0.64 point increase in physical fitness, respectively. Similarly, reallocating the same duration to LPA led to a 0.50 and 0.43 point increase in physical fitness, respectively. Dose response analysis revealed that the mutual substitution of LPA with sedentary behavior and sleep had symmetry, whereas the mutual substitution of MVPA with sedentary behavior and sleep had asymmetry. The effectiveness of replacing sleep or sedentary behavior with MVPA in improving physical fitness decreased with increasing allocation time, whereas the adverse effects of replacing MVPA with sleep or sedentary behavior increased with increasing allocation time.
Conclusion
In the context of 24 hour movement behavior, increasing the time spent on LPA and MVPA is beneficial for physical fitness among college students. It should be recommend that college students actively transition from sedentary behavior to engaging in physical activity, with a particular emphasis on incorporating MVPA.
2.Clinical observation of laparoscopic abdominoperineal intersphincteric resection com-bined with ileostomy for treatment of ultra-low rectal cancer
Jinghui QU ; Jiabei HE ; Qi ZHANG ; Shanchen LI ; Dianchao CHEN ; Xiangdong YANG
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019;46(3):122-125
Objective: To observe and evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic abdominoperineal intersphincteric resection com-bined with ileostomy for the treatment of ultra-low rectal cancer. Methods: Clinicopathologic data of 74 patients undergoing laparo-scopic radical resection for ultra-low rectal cancer at Coloproctology Hospital of Chengdu from January 2015 to June 2017 were retro-spectively analyzed. In total, 43 patients underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal intersphincteric resection combined with ileosto-my (ISR group), and 31 patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection combined with ileostomy (LAR group). The periopera-tive condition, radical resection of tumor, and postoperative anal function were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications between the groups (all P>0.05). The mean operative time was (306.6 ± 25.1) minutes in the ISR group and (239.7 ± 26.4) minutes in the LAR group (P=0.010). There were no significant differences in pT and pN between the groups (all P values>0.05). The coincidence rate of T stage diagnosis was 93.0% in the ISR group and 93.5% in the LAR group. The positive rate of circumferential resection margin in the two groups was 0. The mean distance of the distal margin was (2.3±0.1) cm in the ISR group and (1.4±0.3) cm in the LAR group (P<0.001). All patients were followed up for 12-42 (mean 23.4) months. The local recurrence rate was 0 in the ISR group and 12.9% (4/31) in the LAR group (P=0.027); no distant metastasis was observed in any of the groups. There was no significant difference in the results of the anorectal manometry test between the groups (P>0.05). The proportion of patients with good continence of anal function after closure of ileos- tomy was 83.7% in the ISR group and 87.1% in the LAR group (P>0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal intersphincteric resection combined with ileostomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of ultra-low rectal cancer, and it leads to satisfactory anal function and a short-term curative effect.