Dental Implants ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gingivitis ; Humans ; Male ; Membranes ; Prognosis ; Prosthodontics ; Retrospective Studies ; Sinusitis ; Survival Rate ; Tooth ; Transplants

Humans ; Maxillary Sinus ; Prognosis ; Survival Rate ; Transplantation, Heterologous ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Transplants

Airway Obstruction ; Arteries ; Cellulose, Oxidized ; Hemorrhage ; Hemostasis ; Humans ; Male ; Mandible ; Postoperative Hemorrhage

Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mandible ; Orthognathic Surgery ; Osteotomy ; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus ; Prognathism ; Recurrence

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography(USG) and abdominal computerized tomography(CT) and the possibility of reducing unnecessary appendectomy rate with improvement of diagnostic accuracy using optional CT with USG. METHODS: From January 1999 to May 2003, 496 patients younger than 14 years received surgical intervention with preoperative impression of acute appendicitis. They were devided into three groups no preoperative imaging study; preoperative abdominal USG only; and USG with optional abdominal CT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated in each group, and percentage of unnecessary appendectomy was also obtained. RESULTS: Sensitivity and unnecessary appendectomy rate of group was 78.4% and 21% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and unnecessary appendectomy rates of group were 96.5%, 42.8%, 85.4%, 78% and 12.2%. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of group was 100% and 98%, and no unnecessary appendectomy was performed in this group. CONCLUSION: With consideration of radiation exposure, cost, and in-hospital delay time, using optional CT with USG under optimal indication can decrease the frequency of complications and unnecessary appendectomy rates.
Appendectomy ; Appendicitis* ; Diagnosis* ; Diagnostic Errors ; Humans ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography

The two main screening tests during pregnancy are those for chromosomal abnormalities and neural tube defects (NTDs). In particular, for NTDs, measurement of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) levels early in the second trimester (15-18 weeks of gestation) has been considered the gold standard screening test for the past 4 decades. However, with remarkable technological advancements and the widespread use of ultrasound during those periods, mid-trimester ultrasonography has gradually replaced the role of measuring MSAFP levels as a screening method for NTDs. This change was initiated more about 10 years ago in some countries, which have issued national guidelines to use mid-trimester ultrasonography instead of measuring MSAFP levels as a prenatal screening method for NTDs. However, no significant changes have occurred in Korea, where second-trimester ultrasonography is routinely performed with high-quality equipment. We aimed to provide information regarding the importance of changing the screening method for NTDs from MSAFP measurement to ultrasonography, and to detail methods of implementing mid-trimester ultrasonography for screening purposes. We also share our experience of operating a prenatal diagnostic program for NTDs without using MSAFP for more than 15 years.

The posttraumatic complications of jaw fractures related to jaw function and facial deformity include nonunion, malunion, malocclusion, temporomandibular joint dysfunction and facial asymmetry. This report presents cases referred to our department for revision of malunion and malocclusion following inadequate reduction of jaw fractures. Three patients with posttraumatic malocclusions caused by malunion were treated with a LeFort I osteotomy in one case and re-fracture in two cases. All of the patients exhibited stable results without further complications (e.g., malunion or malocclusion). Accurate preoperative diagnosis and proper anatomical reduction of the fracture segments are essential to preventing post-surgical malunion and malocclusion.
Congenital Abnormalities ; Diagnosis ; Facial Asymmetry ; Humans ; Jaw ; Jaw Fractures ; Malocclusion* ; Osteotomy ; Temporomandibular Joint

OBJECTIVES: We retrospectively evaluated the impact of mandibular third molars on the occurrence of angle and condyle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective investigation using patient records and radiographs. The sample set consisted of 440 patients with mandibular fractures. Eruption space, depth and angulation of the third molar were measured. RESULTS: Of the 144 angle fracture patients, 130 patients had third molars and 14 patients did not. The ratio of angle fractures when a third molar was present (1.26 : 1) was greater than when no third molar was present (0.19 : 1; odds ratio, 6.58; P<0.001). Of the 141 condyle fractures patients, the third molar was present in 84 patients and absent in 57 patients. The ratio of condyle fractures when a third molar was present (0.56 : 1) was lower than when no third molar was present (1.90 : 1; odds ratio, 0.30; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The increased ratio of angle fractures with third molars and the ratio of condyle fractures without a third molar were statistically significant. The occurrence of angle and condyle fractures was more affected by the continuity of the cortical bone at the angle than by the depth of a third molar. These results demonstrate that a third molar can be a determining factor in angle and condyle fractures.
Fractures, Bone ; Humans ; Mandibular Condyle* ; Mandibular Fractures ; Molar, Third* ; Odds Ratio ; Retrospective Studies ; Tooth

Humans ; Mandibular Fractures ; Molar, Third ; Postoperative Complications ; Tooth

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation ; Floors and Floorcoverings ; Humans ; Iliac Artery ; Male ; Mandible ; Mouth ; Neck Dissection ; Surgical Flaps