Epilepsy surgery in Korea began as early as in the 1940s and continued to develop through the second half of the 20th century. Introduction of neuroimaging modalities, establishment of epilepsy monitoring units and the epilepsy team approach contributed to the rapid development. �or about 300�- 400 operations carried out yearly��, t�here i��s at �prese�nt suffi���cien�t n�umb ��er of ep�ileps� y surg�ery cen�ters�� an�d q�ualifi��ed neurosurgeons in Korea. However, Korean neurosurgeons should adapt themselves to changing recent trends. Etiologies of epilepsy have dramatically changed from head trauma and infectious diseases to tumors and developmental abnormalities. Although traditional resective surgery still constitutes the main bulk of the operations, new therapeutic procedures based on neuro�modulation are emerging as alternative treatments. There should also be participation in basic science research which would leads to future innovations in treatment of epilepsy.

The perioperative use of anticonvulsants in patients receiving craniotomy for various CNS diseases has been a routine practice in neurosurgery. However, there have been no unified evidence-based guidelines for the perioperative use of anticonvulsants. We searched for published studies related to this subject in MEDLINE and reviewed them. Several randomized controlled studies were regarded as more important because they could provide strong evidence. The conclusions are as follows. First, postoperative seizures are serious problems in neurosurgical practice and should be strictly controlled. Second, anticonvulsants could decrease the occurrence of postoperative seizures. Third, the therapeutic serum levels of anticonvulsants are of utmost importance in the prevention of postoperative seizures. Fourth, valproic acid has no advantage over phenytoin in the prevention of postoperative seizures.
Anticonvulsants* ; Central Nervous System Diseases ; Craniotomy ; Humans ; Neurosurgery* ; Phenytoin ; Seizures ; Valproic Acid

Epilepsy associated with brain tumors (EABT) is a multi-faceted disease that both oncological and epileptological concerns should be taken into consideration. Usually, it is characterized by chronic drug-resistant epilepsy with a low-grade brain tumor in the cerebrum. However, the distinction of typical EABT and simple brain tumors with short-term epilepsy is obscure. We need a working formulation based on the patient's burden in both oncological and epileptological aspects. The diagnosis of EABT is straightforward, but the treatment should be more complex. Medical treatment with anticonvulsants aloneseems tobe anoutdated remedy for EABT because of the risk of tumor growth and malignant progression in some patients as well as the expected favorable seizure control after surgery. Surgical treatment of EABT has resulted in seizure-free state in about 80% of patients. Complete resection of the tumor is an important prognostic factor in seizure control and probably also in tumor control. Recently, many authors emphasized a lesion-directed surgery aimed at a complete tumor removal in EABT. However, in some patients, especially in patients with dual pathology, electrophysiological studies have to be thoroughly applied. For the treatment of EABT in the temporal lobe, more sophisticated surgical strategy is required. A lesionectomy saving the uninterrupted hippocampus could be applied for selected patients. Further research is strongly needed for better understanding and treatment of EABT and low-grade glioma.
Anticonvulsants ; Brain ; Brain Neoplasms ; Cerebrum ; Epilepsy ; Glioma ; Hippocampus ; Humans ; Seizures ; Temporal Lobe

Schwannomatosis (SWN) is now recognized as a broad classification that includes neurofibromatosis (NF) type 2, reflecting their shared genetic and phenotypic characteristics. Previously, SWN and NF type 2 were considered distinct clinical entities; however, the 2022 classification revision has unified them under the umbrella of SWN, with NF type 2 now referred to as NF2-related SWN. SWN arises from mutations in NF2, SMARCB1 (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1) or LZTR1 (leucine zipper like transcription regulator 1). Recent diagnostic criteria for SWN incorporate molecular classification, including “NF2-related SWN”, “SMARCB1-related SWN”, “LZTR1-related SWN”, “22q-related SWN”, “SWN-not otherwise specified”, or “SWN-not elsewhere classified”. NF2-related SWN is a genetic condition where all individuals with a germline or constitutional NF2 mutation are destined to develop the disease. The pathogenesis of SMARCB1- or LZTR1-related SWN follows a three-step, four-hit model. This involves retention of the mutated germline SMARCB1 or LZTR1 allele in the tumor, loss of the wild-type chromosome 22, and somatic mutation in the NF2 gene. Clinically, NF2-related SWN involves bilateral vestibular schwannomas, with treatment options including microsurgery, radiotherapy, and bevacizumab, each with specific benefits and limitations. Patients with SWN frequently present with chronic pain caused by schwannomas, which often does not correlate with tumor size, location, or burden. Management of SWN is primarily symptom-based. Surgical intervention is reserved for symptomatic lesions, particularly in cases of spinal cord compression or significant functional impairments. Multidisciplinary approaches to pain management are critical for enhancing quality of life. Although malignant transformation of schwannomas is a potential risk, the life expectancy of individuals with SWN is nearly normal. Despite advancements in understanding SWN, further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying genetic mechanisms and to develop targeted therapeutic strategies for this complex disorder.

Schwannomatosis (SWN) is now recognized as a broad classification that includes neurofibromatosis (NF) type 2, reflecting their shared genetic and phenotypic characteristics. Previously, SWN and NF type 2 were considered distinct clinical entities; however, the 2022 classification revision has unified them under the umbrella of SWN, with NF type 2 now referred to as NF2-related SWN. SWN arises from mutations in NF2, SMARCB1 (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1) or LZTR1 (leucine zipper like transcription regulator 1). Recent diagnostic criteria for SWN incorporate molecular classification, including “NF2-related SWN”, “SMARCB1-related SWN”, “LZTR1-related SWN”, “22q-related SWN”, “SWN-not otherwise specified”, or “SWN-not elsewhere classified”. NF2-related SWN is a genetic condition where all individuals with a germline or constitutional NF2 mutation are destined to develop the disease. The pathogenesis of SMARCB1- or LZTR1-related SWN follows a three-step, four-hit model. This involves retention of the mutated germline SMARCB1 or LZTR1 allele in the tumor, loss of the wild-type chromosome 22, and somatic mutation in the NF2 gene. Clinically, NF2-related SWN involves bilateral vestibular schwannomas, with treatment options including microsurgery, radiotherapy, and bevacizumab, each with specific benefits and limitations. Patients with SWN frequently present with chronic pain caused by schwannomas, which often does not correlate with tumor size, location, or burden. Management of SWN is primarily symptom-based. Surgical intervention is reserved for symptomatic lesions, particularly in cases of spinal cord compression or significant functional impairments. Multidisciplinary approaches to pain management are critical for enhancing quality of life. Although malignant transformation of schwannomas is a potential risk, the life expectancy of individuals with SWN is nearly normal. Despite advancements in understanding SWN, further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying genetic mechanisms and to develop targeted therapeutic strategies for this complex disorder.

Schwannomatosis (SWN) is now recognized as a broad classification that includes neurofibromatosis (NF) type 2, reflecting their shared genetic and phenotypic characteristics. Previously, SWN and NF type 2 were considered distinct clinical entities; however, the 2022 classification revision has unified them under the umbrella of SWN, with NF type 2 now referred to as NF2-related SWN. SWN arises from mutations in NF2, SMARCB1 (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1) or LZTR1 (leucine zipper like transcription regulator 1). Recent diagnostic criteria for SWN incorporate molecular classification, including “NF2-related SWN”, “SMARCB1-related SWN”, “LZTR1-related SWN”, “22q-related SWN”, “SWN-not otherwise specified”, or “SWN-not elsewhere classified”. NF2-related SWN is a genetic condition where all individuals with a germline or constitutional NF2 mutation are destined to develop the disease. The pathogenesis of SMARCB1- or LZTR1-related SWN follows a three-step, four-hit model. This involves retention of the mutated germline SMARCB1 or LZTR1 allele in the tumor, loss of the wild-type chromosome 22, and somatic mutation in the NF2 gene. Clinically, NF2-related SWN involves bilateral vestibular schwannomas, with treatment options including microsurgery, radiotherapy, and bevacizumab, each with specific benefits and limitations. Patients with SWN frequently present with chronic pain caused by schwannomas, which often does not correlate with tumor size, location, or burden. Management of SWN is primarily symptom-based. Surgical intervention is reserved for symptomatic lesions, particularly in cases of spinal cord compression or significant functional impairments. Multidisciplinary approaches to pain management are critical for enhancing quality of life. Although malignant transformation of schwannomas is a potential risk, the life expectancy of individuals with SWN is nearly normal. Despite advancements in understanding SWN, further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying genetic mechanisms and to develop targeted therapeutic strategies for this complex disorder.

Schwannomatosis (SWN) is now recognized as a broad classification that includes neurofibromatosis (NF) type 2, reflecting their shared genetic and phenotypic characteristics. Previously, SWN and NF type 2 were considered distinct clinical entities; however, the 2022 classification revision has unified them under the umbrella of SWN, with NF type 2 now referred to as NF2-related SWN. SWN arises from mutations in NF2, SMARCB1 (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1) or LZTR1 (leucine zipper like transcription regulator 1). Recent diagnostic criteria for SWN incorporate molecular classification, including “NF2-related SWN”, “SMARCB1-related SWN”, “LZTR1-related SWN”, “22q-related SWN”, “SWN-not otherwise specified”, or “SWN-not elsewhere classified”. NF2-related SWN is a genetic condition where all individuals with a germline or constitutional NF2 mutation are destined to develop the disease. The pathogenesis of SMARCB1- or LZTR1-related SWN follows a three-step, four-hit model. This involves retention of the mutated germline SMARCB1 or LZTR1 allele in the tumor, loss of the wild-type chromosome 22, and somatic mutation in the NF2 gene. Clinically, NF2-related SWN involves bilateral vestibular schwannomas, with treatment options including microsurgery, radiotherapy, and bevacizumab, each with specific benefits and limitations. Patients with SWN frequently present with chronic pain caused by schwannomas, which often does not correlate with tumor size, location, or burden. Management of SWN is primarily symptom-based. Surgical intervention is reserved for symptomatic lesions, particularly in cases of spinal cord compression or significant functional impairments. Multidisciplinary approaches to pain management are critical for enhancing quality of life. Although malignant transformation of schwannomas is a potential risk, the life expectancy of individuals with SWN is nearly normal. Despite advancements in understanding SWN, further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying genetic mechanisms and to develop targeted therapeutic strategies for this complex disorder.

Sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is an extragonadal germ cell tumor (GCT) that develops in the fetal and neonatal periods. SCT is a type I GCT in which only teratoma and yolk sac tumors arise from extragonadal sites. SCT is the most common type I GCT and is believed to originate through epigenetic reprogramming of early primordial germ cells migrating from the yolk sac to the gonadal ridges. Fetal SCT diagnosed in utero presents many obstetrical problems. For high-risk fetuses, fetal interventions (devascularization and debulking) are under development. Most patients with SCT are operated on after birth. Complete surgical resection is the key for tumor control, and the anatomical location of the tumor determines the surgical approaches. Incomplete resection and malignant histology are risk factors for recurrence. Approximately 10–15% of patients have a tumor recurrence, which is frequently of malignant histology. Long-term surveillance with monitoring of serum alpha fetoprotein and magnetic resonance imaging is required. Survivors of SCT may suffer anorectal, urological, and sexual sequelae later in their life, and comprehensive evaluation and care are required.

Sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is an extragonadal germ cell tumor (GCT) that develops in the fetal and neonatal periods. SCT is a type I GCT in which only teratoma and yolk sac tumors arise from extragonadal sites. SCT is the most common type I GCT and is believed to originate through epigenetic reprogramming of early primordial germ cells migrating from the yolk sac to the gonadal ridges. Fetal SCT diagnosed in utero presents many obstetrical problems. For high-risk fetuses, fetal interventions (devascularization and debulking) are under development. Most patients with SCT are operated on after birth. Complete surgical resection is the key for tumor control, and the anatomical location of the tumor determines the surgical approaches. Incomplete resection and malignant histology are risk factors for recurrence. Approximately 10–15% of patients have a tumor recurrence, which is frequently of malignant histology. Long-term surveillance with monitoring of serum alpha fetoprotein and magnetic resonance imaging is required. Survivors of SCT may suffer anorectal, urological, and sexual sequelae later in their life, and comprehensive evaluation and care are required.

Epilepsy has been known to humankind since antiquity. The surgical treatment of epilepsy began in the early days of neurosurgery and has developed greatly. Many surgical procedures have stood the test of time. However, clinicians treating epilepsy patients are now witnessing a huge tide of change. In 2017, the classification system for seizure and epilepsy types was revised nearly 36 years after the previous scheme was released. The actual difference between these systems may not be large, but there have been many conceptual changes, and clinicians must bid farewell to old terminology. Paradigms in drug discovery are changing, and novel antiseizure drugs have been introduced for clinical use. In particular, drugs that target genetic changes harbor greater therapeutic potential than previous screening-based compounds. The concept of focal epilepsy has been challenged, and now epilepsy is regarded as a network disorder. With this novel concept, stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) is becoming increasingly popular for the evaluation of dysfunctioning neuronal networks. Minimally invasive ablative therapies using SEEG electrodes and neuromodulatory therapies such as deep brain stimulation and vagus nerve stimulation are widely applied to remedy dysfunctional epilepsy networks. The use of responsive neurostimulation is currently off-label in children with intractable epilepsy.
Child ; Classification ; Deep Brain Stimulation ; Drug Discovery ; Drug Resistant Epilepsy ; Electrodes ; Electroencephalography ; Epilepsies, Partial ; Epilepsy ; Humans ; Neurons ; Neurosurgery ; Seizures ; Vagus Nerve Stimulation