1.Behavioural changes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a nationwide survey in Singapore.
Victoria J E LONG ; Jean C J LIU
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2021;50(3):222-231
INTRODUCTION:
As part of infection control measures for COVID-19, individuals have been encouraged to adopt both preventive (such as handwashing) and avoidant behavioural changes (e.g. avoiding crowds). In this study, we examined whether demographics predicted the likelihood that a person would adopt these behaviours in Singapore.
METHODS:
A total of 1,145 participants responded to an online survey conducted between 7 March and 21 April 2020. We collected demographic information and asked participants to report which of 17 behaviour changes they had undertaken because of the COVID-19 outbreak. Regression analyses were performed to predict the number of behavioural changes (preventive, avoidant, and total) as a function of demographics. Finally, we sought to identify predictors of persons who declared that they had not undertaken any of these measures following the outbreak.
RESULTS:
Most participants (97%) reported at least one behavioural change on account of the pandemic, with changes increasing with the number of local COVID-19 cases (
CONCLUSION
Our characterisation of behavioural changes provides a baseline for public health advisories. Moving forward, health authorities can focus their efforts on encouraging segments of the population who do not readily adopt infection control measures against COVID-19.
Adult
;
Age Factors
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
COVID-19/psychology*
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Hand Disinfection/trends*
;
Health Behavior
;
Health Policy
;
Health Surveys
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pandemics
;
Physical Distancing
;
Risk-Taking
;
Self Report
;
Sex Factors
;
Singapore/epidemiology*
;
Socioeconomic Factors
2.An analysis of blinding success in a randomised controlled trial of fish oil omega-3 fatty acids.
Jean C J LIU ; Adrian RAINE ; Rebecca P ANG ; Daniel S S FUNG
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2015;44(3):85-91
INTRODUCTIONIncidental reports collected in clinical trials suggest that amongst participants, omega-3 fatty acids derived from fish oil ('omega-3') may be difficult to blind.
MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a systematic evaluation of blinding success in a 24-week trial of omega-3 versus an oil-based placebo. Within 1 week of supplement commencement (Week 1), a blinding questionnaire was completed by 131 children enrolled in a trial of omega-3 for the treatment of disruptive behaviour disorders. A version of the questionnaire was also completed by their parents at Week 1, and by the children at the end of supplement administration (Week 24).
RESULTSParticipants were unable to differentiate omega-3 from placebo, and accuracy did not improve as a function of: the confidence of guesses, reason for guesses, notice of any change, beliefs about what should change, or time. Child and parent guesses also showed high concordance.
CONCLUSIONTaken together, these data provide strong evidence that the identity of omega-3 can be blinded to participants.
Adolescent ; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders ; diet therapy ; Child ; Dietary Supplements ; Fatty Acids, Omega-3 ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Parents ; Single-Blind Method ; Surveys and Questionnaires