1.A Case of Acute Aortic Dissection Involved Left and Right Coronary Arterial Ostia diagnosed with Transesophageal Echocardiography.
Jwong Ah KWON ; Ho Joong YOUN ; Yong Seok OH ; Sung Ho CHOI ; Jin Sun LEE ; Moo Hyun LEE ; Jea Hyuck CHANG ; Ho Sung PARK ; Chul Soo PARK ; Jong Min LEE ; Wook Sung CHUNG ; Soon Jo HONG
Journal of the Korean Society of Echocardiography 2001;9(2):141-145
Aortic dissection is the most common fatal condition that involves the aorta. Occasionally, symptoms mimic acute myocardial infarction leading to thrombolytic treatment which may have lethal consequences in aortic dissection. Thus, accurate diagnosis in patients with chest pain is therefore essential. We present a case of acute myocardial infarction which resulted from the acute aortic dissection with obstruction of the left and right coronary ostia by intimal flap. Transesophageal echocardiography was used as the diagnostic tool.
Aorta
;
Chest Pain
;
Diagnosis
;
Echocardiography, Transesophageal*
;
Humans
;
Myocardial Infarction
2.Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Deferred Coronary Lesions according to Disease Severity Assessed by Fractional Flow Reserve.
Ki Bum WON ; Chang Wook NAM ; Yun Kyeong CHO ; Hyuck Jun YOON ; Hyoung Seob PARK ; Hyungseop KIM ; Seongwook HAN ; Seung Ho HUR ; Yoon Nyun KIM ; Sang Hyun PARK ; Jung Kyu HAN ; Bon Kwon KOO ; Hyo Soo KIM ; Joon Hyung DOH ; Sung Yun LEE ; Hyoung Mo YANG ; Hong Seok LIM ; Myeong Ho YOON ; Seung Jea TAHK ; Kwon Bae KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2016;31(12):1929-1936
Data on the clinical outcomes in deferred coronary lesions according to functional severity have been limited. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of deferred lesions according to fractional flow reserve (FFR) grade using Korean FFR registry data. Among 1,294 patients and 1,628 lesions in Korean FFR registry, 665 patients with 781 deferred lesions were included in this study. All participants were consecutively categorized into 4 groups according to FFR; group 1: ≥ 0.96 (n = 56), group 2: 0.86–0.95 (n = 330), group 3: 0.81–0.85 (n = 170), and group 4: ≤ 0.80 (n = 99). Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The median follow-up period was 2.1 years. During follow-up, the incidence of MACE in groups 1–4 was 1.8%, 7.6%, 8.8%, and 13.1%, respectively. Compared to group 1, the cumulative rate by Kaplan-Meier analysis of MACE was not different for groups 2 and 3. However, group 4 had higher cumulative rate of MACE compared to group 1 (log-rank P = 0.013). In the multivariate Cox hazard models, only FFR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; P = 0.005) was independently associated with MACE among all participants. In contrast, previous history of percutaneous coronary intervention (HR, 2.37; P = 0.023) and diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (HR, 2.35; P = 0.015), but not FFR, were independent predictors for MACE in subjects with non-ischemic (FFR ≥ 0.81) deferred coronary lesions. Compared to subjects with ischemic deferred lesions, clinical outcomes in subjects with non-ischemic deferred lesions according to functional severity are favorable. However, longer-term follow-up may be necessary.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
;
Coronary Artery Disease
;
Diagnosis
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
;
Myocardial Infarction
;
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
;
Prognosis
;
Proportional Hazards Models