Under new mental health and welfare law, involuntary admission is allowed only for persons with mental illness based on the narrowed criteria of mental illness when they meet both need for treatment and danger to themselves and others. These stringent danger criteria along with narrowed definition of mental illness may prevent timely intervention for people with acute psychosis. It is claimed that the danger criteria is essential to keep up with international (UN, WHO) principles for legislation of mental health acts and laws of advanced countries. The international principles, however, do not necessarily call for stringent danger criteria for involuntary hospitalization. Danger criteria are not also prerequisites for involuntary hospitalization in many advanced countries. In countries with strict danger criteria, complementary measures seem to be taken for the drawback of danger criteria. As for the involuntary hospitalization by legal guardians, the complicated qualification for legal guardians may hinder prompt admission. The required number of legal guardians also needs to be changed from two to one person. Even in the situation where involuntary hospitalization is deemed urgent, there is no way to transport the patients to the hospital for assessment or temporary admission unless the police judges the patients to be dangerous to themselves or others. Outpatient treatment order can be an alternative to involuntary admission. However, it is rarely used since the order cannot be applied to those who do not have history of admission due to danger. For voluntary admission, status conversion to involuntary admission needs to be allowed in case of aggravation of symptoms to meet involuntary admission criteria. In addition, informal admission needs to be introduced to avoid unnecessary formal procedures for patients admitting voluntarily to open ward. In view of all these issues with new mental health and welfare law, entire revision of new mental health law is urgent to balance the rights to proper treatments and protection of human rights of persons with mental disorder.
Evaluation Studies as Topic* ; Hospitalization* ; Human Rights ; Humans ; Jurisprudence* ; Korea* ; Legal Guardians ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Health* ; Outpatients ; Patient Admission ; Police ; Psychotic Disorders

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcome and prognostic factor of postoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty three patients with extremity STS were treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy from January 1981 to December 2010 at Korea University Medical Center. Median total 60 Gy (range, 50 to 74.4 Gy) of radiation was delivered and 7 patients were treated with chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 70 months (range, 5 to 302 months). Twelve patients (27.9%) sustained relapse of their disease. Local recurrence occurred in 3 patients (7.0%) and distant metastases developed in 10 patients (23.3%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 69.2% and disease free survival was 67.9%. The 5-year local relapse-free survival was 90.7% and distant relapse-free survival was 73.3%. On univariate analysis, no significant prognostic factors were associated with development of local recurrence. Histologic grade (p = 0.005) and stage (p = 0.02) influenced the development of distant metastases. Histologic grade was unique significant prognostic factor for the OS on univariate and multivariate analysis. Severe acute treatment-related complications, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or 4, developed in 6 patients (14.0%) and severe late complications in 2 patients (4.7%). CONCLUSION: Conservative surgery with postoperative radiotherapy achieved a satisfactory rate of local control with acceptable complication rate in extremity STS. Most failures were distant metastases that correlate with tumor grade and stage. The majority of local recurrences developed within the field. Selective dose escalation of radiotherapy or development of effective systemic treatment might be considered.
Academic Medical Centers ; Disease-Free Survival ; Extremities ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Korea ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Recurrence ; Sarcoma ; Treatment Outcome

No abstract available.
Adenocarcinoma* ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell*

The new Mental Health and Welfare Law in Korea was revised to require additional diagnosis by a psychiatrist from another public or designated hospital for involuntary admission beyond 2 weeks. In addition, it features the newly established Admission Review Committee for better protection of human rights. The provision of the additional diagnosis by an external psychiatrist resulted from misinformation about the distinction between the second opinion for medical assessment and the review of admission by independent authorities. An additional diagnosis is not required by an external doctor since it is not for review of adequacy of admission but just for second opinion for better medical assessment. Given the limited number of qualified public hospital psychiatrists, additional diagnosis by external psychiatrists does not seem practical unless private hospital doctors are required to visit neighboring hospitals. The current method of cross checking between neighboring doctors is not in accordance with the principles that review should be done by independent authorities. The Admission Review Committee also does not seem to serve the purpose since the role of the Committee is limited to document review, while the proper role of the Committee is left to individual doctors. Admission review should be performed through a thorough interview with the patient by a judicial (or quasi-judicial) authority. Law revision is urgently needed to ensure proper judicial (or quasi-judicial) review of admission, and to streamline unnecessary procedures such as the additional diagnosis by external doctors.
Advisory Committees* ; Diagnosis* ; Hospitals, Private ; Hospitals, Public ; Human Rights ; Humans ; Jurisprudence* ; Korea* ; Mental Health* ; Methods ; Psychiatry* ; Referral and Consultation ; Unnecessary Procedures

OBJECTIVES: The current Korean Mental Health Act (KMHA) indicates that a patient, who voluntarily gave their permission for admission into a mental health facility, has the right to be discharged upon personal request. However, there is no clause in the KMHA that allows a change in a patient's voluntary status under special circumstances. The purpose of this study was to investigate problems that may arise from the lack of such a clause ; problems that can result in misinterpretation and lead to the prohibition of voluntary admission status conversion. METHODS: Previous cases presented to the National Human Rights Commission of Korea were investigated in order to determine the current state in Korean psychiatric practice regarding the conversion from voluntary to involuntary admission status. In addition, examples of similar mental health legislation in use by the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), and several advanced countries pertaining to such conversions were investigated. These examples were used as models for making recommendations for possible changes to the KMHA. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2014, more than 220 petitions were filed with the National Human Right Commission of Korea. The petitions involved voluntarily institutionalized patients who had their requests for discharge rejected. Based on mental health regulations of the UN, WHO, and such countries as the United States, England, Canada, Australia, and Japan, the KMHA should include a provision that, upon receiving a discharge request, allows for discharge refusal if the voluntarily admitted patient is considered not mentally fit. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the absence of a regulation allowing admission status conversion in the current KMHA is inappropriate. Rectification of this absence is urgently needed.
Australia ; Canada ; England ; Human Rights ; Humans ; Japan ; Korea ; Mental Health ; Patient Admission ; Social Control, Formal ; United Nations ; United States ; World Health Organization

No abstract available.
Hyperlipidemias* ; Kidney* ; Transplantation*

No abstract available.
Biopsy* ; Hematuria*

PURPOSE: To analyze the treatment outcomes, complications, prognostic factors after a long-term follow-up of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone or concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1981 and December 2006, 190 eligible patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated at our department with a curative intent. Of these patients, 103 were treated with RT alone and 87 patients received CCRT. The median age was 49 years (range, 8~78 years). The distributions of clinical stage according to the AJCC 6th edition included I: 7 (3.6%), IIA: 8 (4.2%), IIB: 33 (17.4%), III: 82 (43.2%), IVA: 31 (16.3%), IVB: 29 (15.3%). The accumulated radiation doses to the primary tumor ranged from 66.6~87.0 Gy (median, 72 Gy). Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using the RTOG criteria. RESULTS: A total of 96.8% (184/190) of patients completed the planned treatment. With a mean follow-up of 73 months (range, 2~278 months; median, 52 months), 93 (48.9%) patients had relapses that were local 44 (23.2%), nodal 13 (6.8%), or distant 49 (25.8%). The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 55.6% and 44.5%, 54.8% and 51.3%, in addition to 65.3% and 57.4%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that CCRT, age, gender, and stage were significant prognostic factors for OS. The CCRT and gender were independent prognostic factors for both DFS and DSS. There was no grade 4 or 5 acute toxicity, but grade 3 mucositis and hematologic toxicity were present in 42 patients (22.1%) and 18 patients (9.5%), respectively. During follow-up, grade 3 hearing loss in 9 patients and trismus in 6 patients were reported. CONCLUSION: The results of our study were in accordance with findings of previous studies and we confirmed that CCRT, low stage, female gender, and young age were related to improvement in OS. However, there are limitations in the locoregional control that can be achieved by CCRT with 2D conventional radiation therapy. This observation has led to further studies on clarifying the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy by intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hearing Loss ; Humans ; Mucositis ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Trismus

No abstract available.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1* ; Genotype* ; Humans ; Korea* ; Thyroid Diseases* ; Thyroid Gland*

Necrosis of the upper extremity occurs rarely in type 2 diabetic patients compared to lower extremity necrosis. We report a 69-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with necrosis of the left 5th finger tip. The patient had primary biliary cirrhosis accompanied by necrosis of the fingertip due to severe Raynaud's phenomenon. Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a typical autoimmune disease, which can in rare cases be accompanied by autoimmune symptoms including sicca symptom and Raynaud's phenomenon. Furthermore, autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) can be associated. Although every type of vascular etiology should be considered as a cause of digital necrosis, Raynaud's phenomenon is usually not considered in diabetes. We report this case of finger tip necrosis due to severe Raynaud's phenomenon accompanied by PBC and UCTD in a diabetic patient.
Aged ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; Autoimmune Diseases ; Connective Tissue Diseases ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Female ; Fingers ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary ; Lower Extremity ; Necrosis ; Raynaud Disease ; Scleroderma, Systemic ; Upper Extremity