No abstract available.
Breech Presentation* ; Female ; Fetus* ; Pregnancy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of pregnant patients with clinically suspicious acute appendicitis. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 60 pregnant patients who presented to the emergency department with suspected appendicitis and underwent ultrasonography or MRI were included. The official interpretation reports and pathologic reports were extracted and analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for ultrasonography and MRI for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. We also calculated and compared area under the curve (AUC) of both diagnostic tests with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Among 60 patients, 43 (71%) underwent ultrasonography, 37 (61%) underwent MRI, and 20 (33%) underwent both diagnostic tests. Twenty patients were confirmed as pathologically-proven acute appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis were 67%, 77%, 53%, and 86%, while those of MRI were 100% for all parameters. In ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.656, respectively, for ultrasonography, and 1.000 for MRI (p value<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that MRI is more accurate than ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women, especially when the appendix is invisible with ultrasonography.
Appendicitis* ; Appendix ; Area Under Curve ; Cohort Studies ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging* ; Pregnancy* ; Pregnant Women ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography*

Purpose: To assess and compare the diagnostic efficacies of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and computed tomography arthrography (CTA) in identifying labral and chondral lesions within the hip joints. To analyze the diagnostic confidence levels of radiologists when interpreting images obtained from MRA and CTA. Materials and Methods: Labral and chondral lesions in 100 hips of 95 patients on 3.0 tesla MRA, CTA (128- and 160-slice multi-detector computed tomography), and arthroscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curves. The diagnostic confidence of the radiologists was also assessed during image interpretation. Results: Both MRA and CTA showed good diagnostic performances in the assessment of labral and chondral lesions. MRA showed higher sensitivity and accuracy, with a higher AUC for labral lesions than CTA (MRA/CTA: 97.3%/84.8% [p < 0.001], 93.8%/89.8%, and 0.945/0.896 [p = 0.003], respectively). CTA outperformed MRA in diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC in acetabular cartilage lesions (MRA/ CTA: 75.8%/93.9% [p = 0.020], 67.6%/88.2% [p < 0.001], 73.0%/92.0% and 0.717/0.911 [p < 0.001], respectively) and sensitivity, accuracy and AUC in femoral cartilage lesions (60.5%/78.9% [p = 0.020], 80.0%/87.0%, and 0.762/0.854 [p = 0.018], respectively). The diagnostic confidence was higher with MRA for labral lesions (p = 0.002) and with CTA for chondral lesions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Both MRA and CTA showed strong diagnostic abilities for hip joint lesions, with MRA being better for labral lesions and CTA for chondral lesions. Radiologists showed greater confidence in diagnosing labral lesions using MRA and chondral lesions using CTA.

Purpose: To assess and compare the diagnostic efficacies of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and computed tomography arthrography (CTA) in identifying labral and chondral lesions within the hip joints. To analyze the diagnostic confidence levels of radiologists when interpreting images obtained from MRA and CTA. Materials and Methods: Labral and chondral lesions in 100 hips of 95 patients on 3.0 tesla MRA, CTA (128- and 160-slice multi-detector computed tomography), and arthroscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curves. The diagnostic confidence of the radiologists was also assessed during image interpretation. Results: Both MRA and CTA showed good diagnostic performances in the assessment of labral and chondral lesions. MRA showed higher sensitivity and accuracy, with a higher AUC for labral lesions than CTA (MRA/CTA: 97.3%/84.8% [p < 0.001], 93.8%/89.8%, and 0.945/0.896 [p = 0.003], respectively). CTA outperformed MRA in diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC in acetabular cartilage lesions (MRA/ CTA: 75.8%/93.9% [p = 0.020], 67.6%/88.2% [p < 0.001], 73.0%/92.0% and 0.717/0.911 [p < 0.001], respectively) and sensitivity, accuracy and AUC in femoral cartilage lesions (60.5%/78.9% [p = 0.020], 80.0%/87.0%, and 0.762/0.854 [p = 0.018], respectively). The diagnostic confidence was higher with MRA for labral lesions (p = 0.002) and with CTA for chondral lesions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Both MRA and CTA showed strong diagnostic abilities for hip joint lesions, with MRA being better for labral lesions and CTA for chondral lesions. Radiologists showed greater confidence in diagnosing labral lesions using MRA and chondral lesions using CTA.

Purpose: To assess and compare the diagnostic efficacies of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and computed tomography arthrography (CTA) in identifying labral and chondral lesions within the hip joints. To analyze the diagnostic confidence levels of radiologists when interpreting images obtained from MRA and CTA. Materials and Methods: Labral and chondral lesions in 100 hips of 95 patients on 3.0 tesla MRA, CTA (128- and 160-slice multi-detector computed tomography), and arthroscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curves. The diagnostic confidence of the radiologists was also assessed during image interpretation. Results: Both MRA and CTA showed good diagnostic performances in the assessment of labral and chondral lesions. MRA showed higher sensitivity and accuracy, with a higher AUC for labral lesions than CTA (MRA/CTA: 97.3%/84.8% [p < 0.001], 93.8%/89.8%, and 0.945/0.896 [p = 0.003], respectively). CTA outperformed MRA in diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC in acetabular cartilage lesions (MRA/ CTA: 75.8%/93.9% [p = 0.020], 67.6%/88.2% [p < 0.001], 73.0%/92.0% and 0.717/0.911 [p < 0.001], respectively) and sensitivity, accuracy and AUC in femoral cartilage lesions (60.5%/78.9% [p = 0.020], 80.0%/87.0%, and 0.762/0.854 [p = 0.018], respectively). The diagnostic confidence was higher with MRA for labral lesions (p = 0.002) and with CTA for chondral lesions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Both MRA and CTA showed strong diagnostic abilities for hip joint lesions, with MRA being better for labral lesions and CTA for chondral lesions. Radiologists showed greater confidence in diagnosing labral lesions using MRA and chondral lesions using CTA.

Purpose: To assess and compare the diagnostic efficacies of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and computed tomography arthrography (CTA) in identifying labral and chondral lesions within the hip joints. To analyze the diagnostic confidence levels of radiologists when interpreting images obtained from MRA and CTA. Materials and Methods: Labral and chondral lesions in 100 hips of 95 patients on 3.0 tesla MRA, CTA (128- and 160-slice multi-detector computed tomography), and arthroscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curves. The diagnostic confidence of the radiologists was also assessed during image interpretation. Results: Both MRA and CTA showed good diagnostic performances in the assessment of labral and chondral lesions. MRA showed higher sensitivity and accuracy, with a higher AUC for labral lesions than CTA (MRA/CTA: 97.3%/84.8% [p < 0.001], 93.8%/89.8%, and 0.945/0.896 [p = 0.003], respectively). CTA outperformed MRA in diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC in acetabular cartilage lesions (MRA/ CTA: 75.8%/93.9% [p = 0.020], 67.6%/88.2% [p < 0.001], 73.0%/92.0% and 0.717/0.911 [p < 0.001], respectively) and sensitivity, accuracy and AUC in femoral cartilage lesions (60.5%/78.9% [p = 0.020], 80.0%/87.0%, and 0.762/0.854 [p = 0.018], respectively). The diagnostic confidence was higher with MRA for labral lesions (p = 0.002) and with CTA for chondral lesions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Both MRA and CTA showed strong diagnostic abilities for hip joint lesions, with MRA being better for labral lesions and CTA for chondral lesions. Radiologists showed greater confidence in diagnosing labral lesions using MRA and chondral lesions using CTA.

Osteochondral lesions of the femoral head are uncommon and few studies have reported their imaging findings. Since joints are at risk of early degeneration after osteochondral damage, timely recognition is important. Osteochondral lesions of femoral head may often be necessary to differentiate from avascular necrosis. Here, we report a case of osteochondral lesions on bilateral femoral heads. This lesion manifested as subchondral cysts in initial radiographs, which led to further evaluation by computed tomography arthrography and magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed overlying cartilage defects.
Female ; Hip Joint/abnormalities/*radiography ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Osteochondritis/*diagnosis ; Patients ; Sports ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult

Amyloidosis is a disease characterized by the deposition of non-soluble fibrous protein in multiple tissues with a number of possible causes. This protein deposition can occur in any tissue, yet is most commonly seen in kidneys, heart, and gastrointestinal tracts. However, invasion to bone tissues is not often reported. The deposition of amyloid proteins in bone tissues may result in joint pain and pathological fractures; it is important to elucidate the causes and detect early to determine prognosis and treat optimally. In the present case report, with relevant literature review, the authors report a case of total hip arthroplasty in an amyloidosis patient.
Amyloid* ; Amyloidogenic Proteins ; Amyloidosis ; Arthralgia ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Bone and Bones ; Fractures, Spontaneous ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Heart ; Hip Joint* ; Hip* ; Humans ; Kidney ; Multiple Myeloma* ; Prognosis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to estimate gestational age by using FHR parameters after linear and nonlinear analysis of FHR data. Linear spectral decomposition has a limit to describe and analyze the nonlinear and complex physiological nature. Random processing and chaotic analysis assist to quantify some patterned energies, interaction of the physiological system in body system, which the constancy is preserved, and complexity of physical cardiovascular system. But there are no great development of new device which notify fetal age. METHODS: From March 1995 to December 2000, 2,548 cases who received NST during antenatal visit were included in this study. Among these cases, 1000 cases were sampled randomly. We divided this cases into a study and a control group, 500 cases for model building set and the other 500 cases for validation set. Each FHR parameters such as baseline FHR, variability (AMP, MMR), acceleration & deceleration (15 bpm-15 seconds), loss of signal, the number of fetal movement were analysed by using our own computerized HYFM-I, II software system. The linear and non-linear analysis of FHR were done after extracting approximate entropy (ApEn) value. Finally, we performed regression analysis and extract an equation for estimation of gestational weeks using bootstrap method. RESULTS: We extract a following equation using above study method: Log(GA)=5.870-0.051(Sloss*)-0.065(Mean FHR*)+0.049(Mean FHR*)2-0.058(FM*)+0.048(AMP*)2+0.121(A1515*)-0.031(A1515*)2+0.036(ApEn*)2. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate dating of pregnancy, namely gestational week is very important for antenatal diagnosis in the field of perinatal medicine. This study will propose scientific research results which are useful for studying normal and morbid generating physiological fetal condition. We extract an appropriate equation for estimation of gestational weeks only using FHR parameters. We hope to compare our result with other authors' results in the near future.
Acceleration ; Cardiovascular System ; Deceleration ; Entropy ; Female ; Fetal Heart* ; Fetal Movement ; Gestational Age* ; Heart Rate, Fetal* ; Hope ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to estimate gestational age by using FHR parameters after linear and nonlinear analysis of FHR data. Linear spectral decomposition has a limit to describe and analyze the nonlinear and complex physiological nature. Random processing and chaotic analysis assist to quantify some patterned energies, interaction of the physiological system in body system, which the constancy is preserved, and complexity of physical cardiovascular system. But there are no great development of new device which notify fetal age. METHODS: From March 1995 to December 2000, 2,548 cases who received NST during antenatal visit were included in this study. Among these cases, 1000 cases were sampled randomly. We divided this cases into a study and a control group, 500 cases for model building set and the other 500 cases for validation set. Each FHR parameters such as baseline FHR, variability (AMP, MMR), acceleration & deceleration (15 bpm-15 seconds), loss of signal, the number of fetal movement were analysed by using our own computerized HYFM-I, II software system. The linear and non-linear analysis of FHR were done after extracting approximate entropy (ApEn) value. Finally, we performed regression analysis and extract an equation for estimation of gestational weeks using bootstrap method. RESULTS: We extract a following equation using above study method: Log(GA)=5.870-0.051(Sloss*)-0.065(Mean FHR*)+0.049(Mean FHR*)2-0.058(FM*)+0.048(AMP*)2+0.121(A1515*)-0.031(A1515*)2+0.036(ApEn*)2. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate dating of pregnancy, namely gestational week is very important for antenatal diagnosis in the field of perinatal medicine. This study will propose scientific research results which are useful for studying normal and morbid generating physiological fetal condition. We extract an appropriate equation for estimation of gestational weeks only using FHR parameters. We hope to compare our result with other authors' results in the near future.
Acceleration ; Cardiovascular System ; Deceleration ; Entropy ; Female ; Fetal Heart* ; Fetal Movement ; Gestational Age* ; Heart Rate, Fetal* ; Hope ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis