1.Readiness of clients in returning to face-to-face therapy in an outpatient rehabilitation clinic: a preliminary study.
Jaymilyn C. Ombao ; Charlemaine Deane A. Perez ; Audrey Anne D. Esguerra ; Ferdiliza Dandah S. Garcia ; Czarina Camille A. Lazaro ; Michael P. Longno ; Mariam Lujain J. Anwar Bahraq ; Angelika Marie R. Gonzales ; Jen Aebriel DC. Leynes ; Kyla Kristiana F. Lu ; Maria Inez Corazon T. Recto ; Maria Blanquita M. Salvador ; Regina Ariane DR. Tayag
Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 2023;27(2):1-
BACKGROUND:
The Clinic for the Therapy Services (CTS) has considered reverting to face-to-face service delivery due to the downward trend in COVID-19 cases in the Philippines. However, the clinic has yet to investigate the willingness of the clients to this mode as a basis for its effective implementation.
OBJECTIVES:
The study described the readiness of CTS clients in returning to face-to-face therapy amidst the pandemic. It also discussed the factors affecting readiness based on a survey.
METHODOLOGY:
Fifty-five screened survey responses on the readiness of clients in returning to face-to-face therapy were gathered from January 30 to February 28, 2021. These underwent retrospective data analysis. Eight prospective online key informant interviews were conducted for clarifications in May 2022. This study utilized a descriptive analysis of quantitative categorical variables and a thematic content analysis of qualitative data.
RESULTS:
The majority of the respondents (35) stated readiness to attend face-to-face therapy followed by those who answered “No” (11), “Maybe” (5), and others (4). Factors that may have affected
readiness included travel, characteristics of face-to-face therapy, health conditions, vaccine, and
COVID-19 concerns. Frequently preferred health and safety strategies were the provision of hygiene
products, disinfection, limited people inside the clinic, separate therapy areas, and ventilation.
CONCLUSION
Most of the respondents expressed willingness to receive face-to-face therapy in April or May of 2021. Feasibility of travel and decreased number of COVID-19 cases may have encouraged
willingness to attend. Those who were hesitant reported concerns with traveling, characteristics of
face-to-face therapy, health conditions, the COVID-19 situation, and the vaccine.
rehabilitation
;
COVID-19
2.Implementation of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in the Philippines: A survey of registered newborn hearing centers
Patrick John P. Labra ; Olivia Agnes D. Mejia ; Rosario R. Ricalde ; Jaymilyn V. Catangay-Ombao ; Anna Pamela C. Dela Cruz ; Giancarla Marie C. Ambrocio ; Myra G. Capistrano ; Nelson O. Eugenio
Acta Medica Philippina 2023;57(9):15-20
Background:
Universal newborn hearing screening is mandated in the Philippines through the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Act of 2009 (RA 9709). Newborn hearing screening (NBHS) centers are required to perform screening tests, compile and submit data on screened newborns, and advise parents on the subsequent steps after NBHS.
Objective:
The study aimed to conduct a survey of the implementation of the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Program (UNHSIP) in the different regions of the country; and assess the information technology (IT) capabilities of hearing centers.
Methods:
Fifty-one NBHS centers across twelve regions were surveyed through on-site inspections in 2016. Data was gathered on the centers’ testing capability, staffing, access to specialists, use of local protocols, connectivity, and IT capabilities.
Results:
All surveyed centers followed the recommended protocols of the Manual of Operations of the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Act of 2009 (RA 9709). Among the 12 regions visited, only five (41.67%) had Category C centers with confirmatory testing and early amplification services as recommended. Majority of facilities (96.1%) were staffed by trained and certified personnel. A small percentage had access to subspecialists such as clinical audiologists (39.2%) and speech-language pathologists (23.5%). All facilities had computer access, but only 58.8% had internet access. Majority (94.1%) of the centers visited were not using the recommended data submission methods, specifically the use of registry cards and the online registry. Only 27.5% of centers had data on newborns who underwent confirmatory testing or early intervention.
Conclusion
Facilities were found to be compliant to NBHS screening protocols and majority complied with certification requirements for staff; but were found to be non-compliant with use of registry cards or the online registry. Majority of centers were able to contact the parents of neonates who did not pass newborn screening, but had no system to track outcomes. Lack of confirmatory and early intervention services in identified areas emphasize the need for development of regional centers. It is recommended that measures to improve the utilization of the online registry are taken.
Neonatal Screening