Maxillary and mandibular fractures account for a large proportion of facial bone fractures. The primary objective in reduction of marillary or mandibular fractures is to return the structures to normal position of function and cosmetic contour, i.e. restoration of normal occlusal relations through proper positioning of the teeth and bony structures. Interdental wiring, intermaxillary fixation, rigid internal fixation or external pin fixation are common methods in the management of jaw fractures, varying with the age of the patient, location or extent of fracture. Malocclusion is not an uncommon complication after management of jaw pacture. We managed 16 patients (13 males, 3 females) of mandibular or maxillary fractures with model surgery and occlusal splint from July 1998 to August 1999. The average age of patients was 27.4 years and the average follow-up period was 6 months. We achieved good occlusal relationship without malunion, nonunion, or loss of teeth. Acrylic occlusal splints are rigid, strong, easily adjusted and repaired, translucent, lightweight and tolerated well by the oral mucosa. It is useful in the maintenance of intermaxillary fixation and in maintaining continuity of the maxillary or mandibular dental arch, as well as providing precise dental alignment during healing. Splints are helpful in managing fractures of the symphysis, parasymphyseal region, body and alveolar ridges of the mandible, sagittal fractures of the hard palate, and severely comminuted mandible fractures.
Body Regions ; Dental Arch ; Facial Bones ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Jaw ; Jaw Fractures ; Male ; Malocclusion ; Mandible ; Mandibular Fractures* ; Maxillary Fractures ; Mouth Mucosa ; Occlusal Splints* ; Palate, Hard ; Splints ; Tooth

Nasotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with jaw fractures because maxillomandibular fixation is required. However, when there are concomitant fractures of the nose and facial bones, an intubation tube positioned at the nose makes it difficult to perform an intricate surgery. In order to overcome these problems, a variety of ways to change the position of the tube have been introduced. We describe a simple technique of switching the tube from a nasal to oral position, which was easily executed in a patient with concomitant nasal and mandibular fractures, accompanied by a literature review.
Airway Management ; Facial Bones ; Humans ; Intubation* ; Jaw Fixation Techniques ; Jaw Fractures ; Mandibular Fractures ; Nose

mandibular condyle fracture occurs at 15-30% frequency of whole mandibular fracture. The treatment of choice is open reduction or closed reduction. In many cases, closed reduction is preferred for treatment of condylar fracture because it is hard to approach to condyle and there is risk of surgical complications, such as nerve damage in open reduction. Open reduction, however, has some advantages like possibility of anatomical reduction, occlusal stability and rapid functional recovery. Furthermore, it is possible to retain original ramal heights and to decrease deviation during mouth opening. There are many surgical approaches for open reduction of subcondyle fracture. At present, transoral approach using trochar device is tried for effective and minimally invasive method for open reduction of subcondyle fracture. And the authors report the cases of reduction of subcondyle fracture with transoral approach using trochar device.]]>
Jaw Fixation Techniques ; Mandibular Condyle ; Mandibular Fractures ; Mouth

According to the increase in use of implants in clinical dentistry, new kinds of complications happen. Complications that can happen during implant placement are bleeding, nerve injury, jaw fracture, fenestration of maxillary sinus or nasal cavity, dehiscence, fenestration, injury of adjacent tooth. And complications that can happen after implant operation are infection, bleeding, hematoma, chronic sinusitis, peri-implantitis. Problems that are confronted during implant placement happen by inadequate preoperative treatment plan, inadequate consideration about individual anatomic difference, inadequate operation process and lack of experience of clinician. It is important that clinicians consider possible complications in advance and make a comprehensive treatment plan. We report the patient who was happened ramus fracture during block bone harvesting from ramus of severely atrophic mandible, the patient who came to emergency ward due to postoperative swelling and bleeding and the patient whose implant was migrated to maxillary sinus with a review of literature.
Dental Implants* ; Dentistry ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Hematoma ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Jaw Fractures ; Mandible ; Mandibular Fractures ; Maxillary Sinus ; Nasal Cavity ; Peri-Implantitis ; Sinusitis ; Tooth

PURPOSE: To establish management protocol for mandibular angle fracture, we describe pertinent factors including cause, impacted third molar and recent treatment tendency. METHODS: We examined the records of 62 patients who had unilateral mandibular angle fracture. Sixty patients who had open reduction surgery were examined at postoperative weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 28. RESULTS: Left mandibular angle fracture is frequent in younger males. Presence of the mandibular third molar can increase fracture risk. Because of attached muscle, favorable fractures occurred primarily in the mandibular angle area. CONCLUSION: Extracting the mandibular third molar can prevent angle fractures, and open reduction with only one plate adaptation is generally the proper treatment method for mandibular angle fracture.
Humans ; Jaw Fractures ; Male ; Mandibular Injuries ; Molar, Third

According to Luhr's classification, a fracture in the mandible with a width of less than 15-20 mm is considered to be an atrophic mandibular fracture and its incidence is very rare. Because of the reduced cross-sectional area and smaller contact area of the fractured ends as well as the poorly vascularized bony structure and delayed bone healing, an atrophic mandibular fracture is a great challenge for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Surgeons tend to perform closed reduction, because open reduction is considered a non-life-saving surgery among elderly patients. Thus, most of them have limited experience in surgical management. According to recent reports, open reduction yields a good result, and the Association for Osteosynthesis (AO) group has recommended open reduction. This is a case report of our two experiences of open reduction and rigid fixation of atrophic mandibular fractures by the AO principle. Articles were also reviewed here.
Aged ; Atrophy ; Humans ; Incidence ; Jaw, Edentulous ; Mandible ; Mandibular Fractures

The incidence of condylar fractures is high, but the management of fractures of the mandibular condyle continues to be controversial. Historically, maxillomandibular fixation, external fixation, and surgical splints with internal fixation systems were the techniques commonly used in the treatment of the fractured mandible. Condylar fractures can be extracapsular or intracapsular, undisplaced, deviated, displaced, or dislocated. Treatment depends on the age of the patient, the co-existence of other mandibular or maxillary fractures, whether the condylar fracture is unilateral or bilateral, the level and displacement of the fracture, the state of dentition and dental occlusion, and the surgeonnds on the age of the patient, the co-existence of othefrom which it is difficult to recover aesthetically and functionally;an appropriate treatment is required to reconstruct the shape and achieve the function ofthe uninjured status. To do this, accurate diagnosis, appropriate reduction and rigid fixation, and complication prevention are required. In particular, as mandibular condyle fracture may cause long-term complications such as malocclusion, particularly open bite, reduced posterior facial height, and facial asymmetry in addition to chronic pain and mobility limitation, great caution should be taken. Accordingly, the authors review a general overview of condyle fracture.
Chronic Pain ; Dental Occlusion ; Dentition ; Displacement (Psychology) ; Facial Asymmetry ; Humans ; Incidence ; Jaw Fixation Techniques ; Malocclusion ; Mandible ; Mandibular Condyle ; Mandibular Fractures ; Maxillary Fractures ; Mobility Limitation ; Open Bite ; Splints ; Temporomandibular Joint

Fractures of the mandible occur with a greater frequency in the elderly. This study reports three cases of edentulous atrophic mandible fracture in elderly patients treated with open reduction technique. Three patients who presented with edentulous atrophic mandible fractures underwent surgical management using open reduction and internal fixation. After treatment, clinical evaluations and postoperative complications were examined with postoperative x-ray. Patients were followed with clinical and radiographic examinations. In the postoperative clinical evaluation, two male patients healed well, but one female patient complained of pain and swelling. In radiographic examinations, no union delay or lack of fusion was observed in the edentulous area. Open reduction technique is a viable treatment option for the edentulous atrophic mandible fractures in geriatric patients.
Aged* ; Bone Plates ; Female ; Humans ; Jaw, Edentulous ; Male ; Mandible* ; Mandibular Fractures ; Mandibular Reconstruction ; Postoperative Complications

In the treatment of mandibular condyle fracture, conservative treatment using closed reduction or surgical treatment using open reduction can be used. Management of mandibular condylar fractures remains a source of ongoing controversy in oral and maxillofacial trauma. For each type of condylar fracture,the treatment method must be chosen taking into consideration the presence of teeth, fracture height, patient'sadaptation, patient's masticatory system, disturbance of occlusal function, and deviation of the mandible. In the past, closed reduction with concomitant active physical therapy conducted after intermaxillary fixation during the recovery period had been mainly used, but in recent years, open treatment of condylar fractures with rigid internal fixation has become more common. The objective of this review was to evaluate the main variables that determine the choice of an open or closed method for treatment of condylar fractures, identifying their indications, advantages, and disadvantages, and to appraise the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions that are used in the management of fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Jaw Fixation Techniques ; Mandible ; Mandibular Condyle ; Mandibular Fractures ; Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive ; Stomatognathic System ; Tooth

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to analyze the incidence, demographic distribution, type, and etiology of mandible fractures that were treated by the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital from January 2002 to December 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive and analytic retrospective study that evaluated 735 patients that were treated for mandible fracture. RESULTS: This study included 1,172 fractures in 735 patients. The ratio of male to female patients was 5.45 : 1; the maximum value was in patients between 20 and 29 years (38.1%) and the minimum in patients over 70 years old. The monthly distribution of facial fractures peaked in the fall and was lower during winter. No specific correlation was identified based on the annual fracture distribution. Among the 735 fracture patients, 1.59 fracture lines were observed per patient. The most frequent site was the symphysis, which accounted for a total of 431 fractures, followed by the angle (348), condyle (279), and body (95). The symphysis with angle was the most common site identified in combination with fracture and accounted for 22.4%, followed by symphysis with condyle (19.8%). The angle was the most frequent site of single fractures (20.8%). The major cause of injury was accidental trauma (43.4%), which was followed by other causes such as violence (33.9%), sports-related accidents (10.5%), and traffic accidents (10.1%). Fracture incidents correlated with alcohol consumption were reported between 10.0%-26.9% annually. CONCLUSION: Although mandible fracture pattern is similar to the previous researches, there is some changes in the etiologic factors.
Accidents, Traffic ; Alcohol Drinking ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Jaw Fractures ; Male ; Mandible* ; Mandibular Fractures ; Retrospective Studies* ; Surgery, Oral ; Violence