1.Study for hounsfield units in computed tomogram with jaw lesion.
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2006;32(4):391-396
The CT number is called Hounsfield unit(HU). Generally HU has a score between +1000 from -1000, and it is standardized usingthe air(-1000), water(0), and compact bone(+1000). Hounsfield Unit to standardize the density in computed tomography using the air and water has been used to analysis of lesion in other medical field. Computed tomography is popular method to analysis of lesion in oral and maxillofacial field but the analysis about density of lesion by Hounsfield unit is still obscure. For this study, computed tomography taken in Dankook University Dental Hospital and Hounsfield unit was measured to compare the difference of jaw bone lesion as cystic lesion, benign tumor, malignant tumor.
Jaw*
2.Accessory jaw bone: report of a case.
Sun Youl RYU ; Hee Kyun OH ; Geon Jung KIM ; Young Soo YUN
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 1992;18(4):130-136
No abstract available.
Jaw*
3.Clinico-histopathologic study on cysts of the jaw.
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 1993;19(1):22-36
No abstract available.
Jaw*
4.Clinico-histopathologic study on cysts of the jaw.
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 1993;19(1):22-36
No abstract available.
Jaw*
5.Comparison of Enhanced Dynamic Wedge with Physical Metal Wedge based on the Basic Dosimetric Parameters.
Jeong Woo LEE ; Semie HONG ; Kyoung Sik CHOI ; Jin Beom CHUNG ; Bo Young CHOE ; Hong Seok JANG ; Tae Suk SUH
Korean Journal of Medical Physics 2005;16(2):70-75
For clinical implementation of Enhanced Dynamic Wedge (EDW), it is necessary to adequately analyze and commission its dosimetric properties in comparison to common physical metal wedge (MTW). This study was implemented with the essential measurements of parameters for clinical application, such as percentage depth dose, peripheral dose, surface dose, effective wedge factor, and wedge profile. In addition, through the comparison study of EDW with open and MTW, the analysis was performed to characterize the EDW. We also compared EDW dose profiles of measured values using chamber array 24 (CA24) with calculated values using radiation treatment planning system. PDDs of EDW showed good agreements between 0.2~0.5% of open beam, but 2% differences with MTW. In the result of the measurements of peripheral dose, it was shown that MTW was about 1% higher than open field and EDW. The surface doses of 60degrees MTW showed 10% lower than the others. We found that effective wedge factor of EDW had linear relationships according to Y jaw sizes and was independent of X jaw sizes and was independent of X jaw sizes and asymmetric Y jaw opening. In comparison with measured values and calculate values from Golden-STT based radiation treatment planning system (RTP system), it showed very good agreement within difference of 1%. It could be concluded that EDW is a very reliable and useful tool as a beam modification substitute for conventional MTW.
Jaw
7.A clinical study of the osteoradionecrosis of the jaw.
Yong Kack KIM ; Heon Seok YU ; Jae Keun KWAK ; Kyu Yeong KIM
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 1993;19(2):177-184
No abstract available.
Jaw*
;
Osteoradionecrosis*
8.A clinical study of the osteoradionecrosis of the jaw.
Yong Kack KIM ; Heon Seok YU ; Jae Keun KWAK ; Kyu Yeong KIM
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 1993;19(2):177-184
No abstract available.
Jaw*
;
Osteoradionecrosis*
9.Preventation of teeth and jaw defect
Journal of Vietnamese Medicine 1998;225(9, 10):56-57
10.Analysis on the Effect of Field Width in the Delineation of Planning Target Volume for TomoTherapy.
Ju Young SONG ; Byung Sik NAH ; Woong Ki CHUNG ; Sung Ja AHN ; Taek Keun NAM ; Mee Sun YOON ; Jae Uk JUNG
Korean Journal of Medical Physics 2010;21(4):323-331
The Hi-Art system for TomoTherapy allows only three (1.0 cm, 2.5 cm, 5.0 cm) field widths and this can produce different dose distribution around the end of PTV (Planning target volume) in the direction of jaw movement. In this study, we investigated the effect of field width on the dose difference around the PTV using DQA (Delivery quality assurance) phantom and real clinical patient cases. In the analysis with DQA phantom, the calculated dose and irradiated films showed that the more dose was widely spreaded out in the end region of PTV as increase of field width. The 2.5 cm field width showed a 1.6 cm wider dose profile and the 5.0 cm field width showed a 4.2 cm wider dose profile compared with the 1.0 cm field width in the region of 50% of maximum dose. The analysis with four patient cases also showed the similar results with the DQA phantom which means that more dose was irradiated around the superior and inferior end of PTV as an increase of field width. The 5.0 cm field width produced the remarkable high dose distribution around the end region of PTV and we could evaluate the effect quantitatively with the calculation of DVH (Dose volume histogram) of the virtual PTVs which were delineated around the end of PTV in the direction of jaw variation. From these results, we could verify that the margin for PTV in the direction of table movement should be reduced compared with the conventional margin for PTV when the large field such as 5.0 cm was used in TomoTherapy.
Humans
;
Jaw