1.Selective utilization of circulating tumor DNA testing enables disease monitoring in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas
Amy JAMIESON ; Melissa K. MCCONECHY ; Amy LUM ; Janine SENZ ; Tanner DOWHY ; David G. HUNTSMAN ; Jessica N. MCALPINE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e5-
Objective:
Biomarkers reflecting real-time response to therapy and recurrence are lacking.We assessed the clinical value of detecting cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients.
Methods:
EC/OC patients undergoing primary surgery were consented for tissue banking and 2-year serial blood draws. Tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA underwent next generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel for somatic mutations.
Results:
Of 44 patients (24 EC, 17 OC, 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas [SEOC] and 1 endocervical adenocarcinoma [EA]) at least one somatic mutation was identified in tumor tissue in 40 (91%, 20/24 EC, all OC/SEOC/EA), and in preoperative plasma ctDNA in 12 (27%) patients (6/24 [25%] EC and 6/17 [35%] OC). Detection of preoperative ctDNA mutations was associated with advanced stage, higher preoperative CA125, and subsequent disease recurrence. In 5/12 (42%) patients with preoperative ctDNA mutations, examination/imaging suggested clinical stage I however final pathology revealed stage II/III. In 11 patients where serial timepoints were assessed during treatment for ctDNA and CA125, ctDNA clearance preceded normalization of CA125. Thirteen patients developed recurrent disease (4 EC, 8 OC, 1 EA); 8 in whom ctDNA mutations were detected postoperatively, and 4 followed through time of recurrence with ctDNA mutations identified 2–5 months prior to clinical/radiologic/biomarker progression in 3.
Conclusion
ctDNA can reflect larger tumor volume/metastases, treatment response and subsequent disease recurrence in EC and OC. Careful patient selection is critical to direct resources to patients most likely to benefit, considering disease burden and risk group.
2.Selective utilization of circulating tumor DNA testing enables disease monitoring in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas
Amy JAMIESON ; Melissa K. MCCONECHY ; Amy LUM ; Janine SENZ ; Tanner DOWHY ; David G. HUNTSMAN ; Jessica N. MCALPINE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e5-
Objective:
Biomarkers reflecting real-time response to therapy and recurrence are lacking.We assessed the clinical value of detecting cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients.
Methods:
EC/OC patients undergoing primary surgery were consented for tissue banking and 2-year serial blood draws. Tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA underwent next generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel for somatic mutations.
Results:
Of 44 patients (24 EC, 17 OC, 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas [SEOC] and 1 endocervical adenocarcinoma [EA]) at least one somatic mutation was identified in tumor tissue in 40 (91%, 20/24 EC, all OC/SEOC/EA), and in preoperative plasma ctDNA in 12 (27%) patients (6/24 [25%] EC and 6/17 [35%] OC). Detection of preoperative ctDNA mutations was associated with advanced stage, higher preoperative CA125, and subsequent disease recurrence. In 5/12 (42%) patients with preoperative ctDNA mutations, examination/imaging suggested clinical stage I however final pathology revealed stage II/III. In 11 patients where serial timepoints were assessed during treatment for ctDNA and CA125, ctDNA clearance preceded normalization of CA125. Thirteen patients developed recurrent disease (4 EC, 8 OC, 1 EA); 8 in whom ctDNA mutations were detected postoperatively, and 4 followed through time of recurrence with ctDNA mutations identified 2–5 months prior to clinical/radiologic/biomarker progression in 3.
Conclusion
ctDNA can reflect larger tumor volume/metastases, treatment response and subsequent disease recurrence in EC and OC. Careful patient selection is critical to direct resources to patients most likely to benefit, considering disease burden and risk group.
3.Selective utilization of circulating tumor DNA testing enables disease monitoring in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas
Amy JAMIESON ; Melissa K. MCCONECHY ; Amy LUM ; Janine SENZ ; Tanner DOWHY ; David G. HUNTSMAN ; Jessica N. MCALPINE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e5-
Objective:
Biomarkers reflecting real-time response to therapy and recurrence are lacking.We assessed the clinical value of detecting cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients.
Methods:
EC/OC patients undergoing primary surgery were consented for tissue banking and 2-year serial blood draws. Tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA underwent next generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel for somatic mutations.
Results:
Of 44 patients (24 EC, 17 OC, 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas [SEOC] and 1 endocervical adenocarcinoma [EA]) at least one somatic mutation was identified in tumor tissue in 40 (91%, 20/24 EC, all OC/SEOC/EA), and in preoperative plasma ctDNA in 12 (27%) patients (6/24 [25%] EC and 6/17 [35%] OC). Detection of preoperative ctDNA mutations was associated with advanced stage, higher preoperative CA125, and subsequent disease recurrence. In 5/12 (42%) patients with preoperative ctDNA mutations, examination/imaging suggested clinical stage I however final pathology revealed stage II/III. In 11 patients where serial timepoints were assessed during treatment for ctDNA and CA125, ctDNA clearance preceded normalization of CA125. Thirteen patients developed recurrent disease (4 EC, 8 OC, 1 EA); 8 in whom ctDNA mutations were detected postoperatively, and 4 followed through time of recurrence with ctDNA mutations identified 2–5 months prior to clinical/radiologic/biomarker progression in 3.
Conclusion
ctDNA can reflect larger tumor volume/metastases, treatment response and subsequent disease recurrence in EC and OC. Careful patient selection is critical to direct resources to patients most likely to benefit, considering disease burden and risk group.
4.The British Society for Sexual Medicine Guidelines on Male Adult Testosterone Deficiency, with Statements for Practice
Geoffrey HACKETT ; Michael KIRBY ; Rowland W. REES ; T. Hugh JONES ; Asif MUNEER ; Mark LIVINGSTON ; Nick OSSEI-GERNING ; Janine DAVID ; Jeff FOSTER ; Philip A. KALRA ; Sudarshan RAMACHANDRAN
The World Journal of Men's Health 2023;41(3):508-537
Testosterone deficiency (TD) is an increasingly common problem with significant health implications, but its diagnosis and management can be challenging. A multi-disciplinary panel from BSSM reviewed the available literature on TD and provide evidence-based statements for clinical practice. Evidence was derived from Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane searches on hypogonadism, testosterone therapy (T Therapy) and cardiovascular safety from May 2017 to September 2022. This revealed 1,714 articles, including 52 clinical trials and 32 placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials. A total of twenty-five statements are provided, relating to five key areas: screening, diagnosis, initiating T Therapy, benefits and risks of T Therapy, and follow-up. Seven statements are supported by level 1 evidence, eight by level 2, five by level 3, and five by level 4. Recent studies have demonstrated that low levels of testosterone in men are associated with increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus, worse outcomes in chronic kidney disease and COVID 19 infection with increased all-cause mortality, along with significant quality of life implications. These guidelines should help practitioners to effectively diagnose and manage primary and age-related TD.