1.A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one.
James P SIMMER ; Amelia S RICHARDSON ; Yuan-Yuan HU ; Charles E SMITH ; Jan Ching-Chun HU
International Journal of Oral Science 2012;4(3):129-134
Enamel crystals are unique in shape, orientation and organization. They are hundreds of thousands times longer than they are wide, run parallel to each other, are oriented with respect to the ameloblast membrane at the mineralization front and are organized into rod or interrod enamel. The classical theory of amelogenesis postulates that extracellular matrix proteins shape crystallites by specifically inhibiting ion deposition on the crystal sides, orient them by binding multiple crystallites and establish higher levels of crystal organization. Elements of the classical theory are supported in principle by in vitro studies; however, the classical theory does not explain how enamel forms in vivo. In this review, we describe how amelogenesis is highly integrated with ameloblast cell activities and how the shape, orientation and organization of enamel mineral ribbons are established by a mineralization front apparatus along the secretory surface of the ameloblast cell membrane.
Ameloblasts
;
chemistry
;
cytology
;
Amelogenesis
;
physiology
;
Basement Membrane
;
chemistry
;
Crystallization
;
Dental Enamel
;
chemistry
;
Dental Enamel Proteins
;
secretion
;
Humans
;
Tooth Calcification
2.Correction: Analyses of oligodontia phenotypes and genetic etiologies.
Mengqi ZHOU ; Hong ZHANG ; Heather CAMHI ; Figen SEYMEN ; Mine KORUYUCU ; Yelda KASIMOGLU ; Jung-Wook KIM ; Hera KIM-BERMAN ; Ninna M R YUSON ; Paul J BENKE ; Yiqun WU ; Feng WANG ; Yaqin ZHU ; James P SIMMER ; Jan C-C HU
International Journal of Oral Science 2021;13(1):35-35
3.Analyses of oligodontia phenotypes and genetic etiologies.
Mengqi ZHOU ; Hong ZHANG ; Heather CAMHI ; Figen SEYMEN ; Mine KORUYUCU ; Yelda KASIMOGLU ; Jung-Wook KIM ; Hera KIM-BERMAN ; Ninna M R YUSON ; Paul J BENKE ; Yiqun WU ; Feng WANG ; Yaqin ZHU ; James P SIMMER ; Jan C-C HU
International Journal of Oral Science 2021;13(1):32-32
Oligodontia is the congenital absence of six or more teeth and comprises the more severe forms of tooth agenesis. Many genes have been implicated in the etiology of tooth agenesis, which is highly variable in its clinical presentation. The purpose of this study was to identify associations between genetic mutations and clinical features of oligodontia patients. An online systematic search of papers published from January 1992 to June 2021 identified 381 oligodontia cases meeting the eligibility criteria of causative gene mutation, phenotype description, and radiographic records. Additionally, ten families with oligodontia were recruited and their genetic etiologies were determined by whole-exome sequence analyses. We identified a novel mutation in WNT10A (c.99_105dup) and eight previously reported mutations in WNT10A (c.433 G > A; c.682 T > A; c.318 C > G; c.511.C > T; c.321 C > A), EDAR (c.581 C > T), and LRP6 (c.1003 C > T, c.2747 G > T). Collectively, 20 different causative genes were implicated among those 393 cases with oligodontia. For each causative gene, the mean number of missing teeth per case and the frequency of teeth missing at each position were calculated. Genotype-phenotype correlation analysis indicated that molars agenesis is more likely linked to PAX9 mutations, mandibular first premolar agenesis is least associated with PAX9 mutations. Mandibular incisors and maxillary lateral incisor agenesis are most closely linked to EDA mutations.
Humans
;
Phenotype
;
Wnt Proteins