1.Postphalloplasty urinary function test: an observational study of novel outcome instrument to capture urinary dysfunction and quality of life after phalloplasty.
James L LIU ; Lauren EISENBEIS ; Stephanie PRESTON ; Arthur L BURNETT ; Heather N DICARLO ; Devin COON
Asian Journal of Andrology 2022;24(6):570-574
Due to growing social acceptance, there has been an increasing number of gender-affirmation surgeries performed in North America. Most research in this patient population focuses on surgical outcomes and advancing techniques. However, little work has been done to study functional outcomes. To better evaluate urinary dysfunction in the postphalloplasty trans men patient population, our group developed a novel patient-reported outcome instrument - the postphalloplasty urinary function test (PP UFT) and protocol to measure postvoid urethral volume (PVUR), and we present our preliminary results. We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study in a cohort of 15 adult trans men who had undergone phalloplasty with urethral lengthening surgery between 2018 and 2021. Patients had stable urinary function via the neophallus at the time of survey. Patients filled out the PP UFT and were asked to record their PVUR as per our protocol. The average PP UFT score was 8.9 out of 40 and the average quality-of-life (QOL) score was 2.6. Postvoid dribbling constituted the major complaint and on average comprised 63.2% of the reported PP UFT score. The average PVUR was 2.2 ml (range: 0.5-5.6 ml). There was a positive correlation between higher PP UFT and worse-reported quality of life (P < 0.01; R2 = 0.4). Current questionnaires accepted in cis-male urology have limitations for accurately capturing urinary dysfunction in this specific patient group. The combination of PP UFT and PVUR measurement offers potential for quantifying urinary function and quality of life in patients who undergo phalloplasty. Future studies will validate these instruments.
Adult
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Quality of Life
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Pilot Projects
;
Sex Reassignment Surgery
;
Urethra/surgery*
2.Resident involvement in the prostatic urethral lift: implementing innovative technology in an academic setting.
Ridwan ALAM ; Matthew J RABINOWITZ ; Taylor P KOHN ; Vanessa N PEÑA ; James L LIU ; Yasin BHANJI ; Amin S HERATI
Asian Journal of Andrology 2021;23(6):616-620
Adoption of the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia highlights the importance of training residents with novel technology without compromising patient care. This study examines the effect of resident involvement during PUL on patient and procedural outcomes. Retrospective chart review was conducted on all consecutive PUL cases performed by a single academic urologist between October 2017 and November 2019. Trainees in post-graduate year (PGY) 1-3 are considered junior residents, while those in PGY 4-6 are senior residents. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QOL) scores were used to measure outcomes. Simple and mixed-effects linear regression models were used to compare differences. There were 110 patients with a median age of 66.4 years. Residents were involved in 73 cases (66.4%), and senior residents were involved in 31 of those cases. Resident involvement was not associated with adverse perioperative outcomes with respect to the number of implants fired, the percentage of implants successfully placed, or the postoperative catheterization rate. After adjustment for confounding factors, junior residents were associated with significantly longer case length compared to the attending alone (+12.6 min, P = 0.003) but senior residents were not (+2.4 min, P = 0.59). IPSS and QOL scores were not significantly affected by resident involvement (P = 0.12 and P = 0.21, respectively). The presence of surgeons-in-training, particularly those in the early stages, prolongs PUL case length but does not appear to have an adverse impact on patient outcomes.
Aged
;
Humans
;
Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data*
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prostate/surgery*
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery*
;
Quality of Life/psychology*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Ureteroscopy/statistics & numerical data*
3.Systematic and other reviews: criteria and complexities.
Robert T SATALOFF ; Matthew L BUSH ; Rakesh CHANDRA ; Douglas CHEPEHA ; Brian ROTENBERG ; Edward W FISHER ; David GOLDENBERG ; Ehab Y HANNA ; Joseph E KERSCHNER ; Dennis H KRAUS ; John H KROUSE ; Daqing LI ; Michael LINK ; Lawrence R LUSTIG ; Samuel H SELESNICK ; Raj SINDWANI ; Richard J SMITH ; James R TYSOME ; Peter C WEBER ; D Bradley WELLING ; Xinhao ZHANG ; Zheng LIU
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2021;56(7):687-690