Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the diverse characteristics of a novel commercial bolus, CLEANBOLUS-WHITE (CBW), to ascertain its suitability for clinical application. Methods: The evaluation of CBW encompassed both physical and biological assessments. Physical parameters such as mass density and shore hardness were measured alongside analyses of element composition. Biological evaluations included assessments for skin irritation and cytotoxicity. Dosimetric properties were examined by calculating surface dose and beam quality using a treatment planning system (TPS). Additionally, doses were measured at maximum and reference depths, and the results were compared with those obtained using a solid water phantom. The effect of air gap on dose measurement was also investigated by comparing measured doses on the RANDO phantom, under the bolus, with doses calculated from the TPS. Results: Biological evaluation confirmed that CBW is non-cytotoxic, nonirritant, and nonsensitizing. The bolus exhibited a mass density of 1.02 g/cm 3 and 14 shore 00. Dosimetric evaluations revealed that using the 0.5 cm CBW resulted in less than a 1% difference compared to using the solid water phantom. Furthermore, beam quality calculations in the TPS indicated increased surface dose with the bolus. The air gap effect on dose measurement was deemed negligible, with a difference of approximately 1% between calculated and measured doses, aligning with measurement uncertainty. Conclusions CBW demonstrates outstanding properties for clinical utilization. The dosimetric evaluation underscores a strong agreement between calculated and measured doses, validating its reliability in both planning and clinical settings.

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the diverse characteristics of a novel commercial bolus, CLEANBOLUS-WHITE (CBW), to ascertain its suitability for clinical application. Methods: The evaluation of CBW encompassed both physical and biological assessments. Physical parameters such as mass density and shore hardness were measured alongside analyses of element composition. Biological evaluations included assessments for skin irritation and cytotoxicity. Dosimetric properties were examined by calculating surface dose and beam quality using a treatment planning system (TPS). Additionally, doses were measured at maximum and reference depths, and the results were compared with those obtained using a solid water phantom. The effect of air gap on dose measurement was also investigated by comparing measured doses on the RANDO phantom, under the bolus, with doses calculated from the TPS. Results: Biological evaluation confirmed that CBW is non-cytotoxic, nonirritant, and nonsensitizing. The bolus exhibited a mass density of 1.02 g/cm 3 and 14 shore 00. Dosimetric evaluations revealed that using the 0.5 cm CBW resulted in less than a 1% difference compared to using the solid water phantom. Furthermore, beam quality calculations in the TPS indicated increased surface dose with the bolus. The air gap effect on dose measurement was deemed negligible, with a difference of approximately 1% between calculated and measured doses, aligning with measurement uncertainty. Conclusions CBW demonstrates outstanding properties for clinical utilization. The dosimetric evaluation underscores a strong agreement between calculated and measured doses, validating its reliability in both planning and clinical settings.

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the diverse characteristics of a novel commercial bolus, CLEANBOLUS-WHITE (CBW), to ascertain its suitability for clinical application. Methods: The evaluation of CBW encompassed both physical and biological assessments. Physical parameters such as mass density and shore hardness were measured alongside analyses of element composition. Biological evaluations included assessments for skin irritation and cytotoxicity. Dosimetric properties were examined by calculating surface dose and beam quality using a treatment planning system (TPS). Additionally, doses were measured at maximum and reference depths, and the results were compared with those obtained using a solid water phantom. The effect of air gap on dose measurement was also investigated by comparing measured doses on the RANDO phantom, under the bolus, with doses calculated from the TPS. Results: Biological evaluation confirmed that CBW is non-cytotoxic, nonirritant, and nonsensitizing. The bolus exhibited a mass density of 1.02 g/cm 3 and 14 shore 00. Dosimetric evaluations revealed that using the 0.5 cm CBW resulted in less than a 1% difference compared to using the solid water phantom. Furthermore, beam quality calculations in the TPS indicated increased surface dose with the bolus. The air gap effect on dose measurement was deemed negligible, with a difference of approximately 1% between calculated and measured doses, aligning with measurement uncertainty. Conclusions CBW demonstrates outstanding properties for clinical utilization. The dosimetric evaluation underscores a strong agreement between calculated and measured doses, validating its reliability in both planning and clinical settings.

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the diverse characteristics of a novel commercial bolus, CLEANBOLUS-WHITE (CBW), to ascertain its suitability for clinical application. Methods: The evaluation of CBW encompassed both physical and biological assessments. Physical parameters such as mass density and shore hardness were measured alongside analyses of element composition. Biological evaluations included assessments for skin irritation and cytotoxicity. Dosimetric properties were examined by calculating surface dose and beam quality using a treatment planning system (TPS). Additionally, doses were measured at maximum and reference depths, and the results were compared with those obtained using a solid water phantom. The effect of air gap on dose measurement was also investigated by comparing measured doses on the RANDO phantom, under the bolus, with doses calculated from the TPS. Results: Biological evaluation confirmed that CBW is non-cytotoxic, nonirritant, and nonsensitizing. The bolus exhibited a mass density of 1.02 g/cm 3 and 14 shore 00. Dosimetric evaluations revealed that using the 0.5 cm CBW resulted in less than a 1% difference compared to using the solid water phantom. Furthermore, beam quality calculations in the TPS indicated increased surface dose with the bolus. The air gap effect on dose measurement was deemed negligible, with a difference of approximately 1% between calculated and measured doses, aligning with measurement uncertainty. Conclusions CBW demonstrates outstanding properties for clinical utilization. The dosimetric evaluation underscores a strong agreement between calculated and measured doses, validating its reliability in both planning and clinical settings.

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the diverse characteristics of a novel commercial bolus, CLEANBOLUS-WHITE (CBW), to ascertain its suitability for clinical application. Methods: The evaluation of CBW encompassed both physical and biological assessments. Physical parameters such as mass density and shore hardness were measured alongside analyses of element composition. Biological evaluations included assessments for skin irritation and cytotoxicity. Dosimetric properties were examined by calculating surface dose and beam quality using a treatment planning system (TPS). Additionally, doses were measured at maximum and reference depths, and the results were compared with those obtained using a solid water phantom. The effect of air gap on dose measurement was also investigated by comparing measured doses on the RANDO phantom, under the bolus, with doses calculated from the TPS. Results: Biological evaluation confirmed that CBW is non-cytotoxic, nonirritant, and nonsensitizing. The bolus exhibited a mass density of 1.02 g/cm 3 and 14 shore 00. Dosimetric evaluations revealed that using the 0.5 cm CBW resulted in less than a 1% difference compared to using the solid water phantom. Furthermore, beam quality calculations in the TPS indicated increased surface dose with the bolus. The air gap effect on dose measurement was deemed negligible, with a difference of approximately 1% between calculated and measured doses, aligning with measurement uncertainty. Conclusions CBW demonstrates outstanding properties for clinical utilization. The dosimetric evaluation underscores a strong agreement between calculated and measured doses, validating its reliability in both planning and clinical settings.

Radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer in companion animals is currently administered by using megavoltage X-ray machines. Because these machines are expensive, most animal hospitals do not perform radiotherapy. This study evaluated the ability of relatively inexpensive kilovoltage X-ray machines to treat companion animals. A simulation study based on a commercial treatment-planning system was performed for tumors of the brain (non-infectious meningoencephalitis), nasal cavity (malignant nasal tumors), forefoot (malignant muscular tumors), and abdomen (malignant intestinal tumors). The results of kilovoltage (300 kV and 450 kV) and megavoltage (6 MV) X-ray beams were compared. Whereas the 300 kV and 6 MV X-ray beams provided optimal radiation dose homogeneity and conformity, respectively, for brain tumors, the 6 MV X-rays provided optimal homogeneity and radiation conformity for nasal cavity, forefoot, and abdominal tumors. Although megavoltage X-ray beams provided better radiation dose distribution in most treated animals, the differences between megavoltage and kilovoltage X-ray beams were relatively small. The similar therapeutic effects of the kilovoltage and 6 MV X-ray beams suggest that kilovoltage X-ray beams may be effective alternatives to megavoltage X-ray beams in treating cancers in companion animals.
Abdomen ; Animals ; Brain ; Brain Neoplasms ; Friends ; Hospitals, Animal ; Humans ; Nasal Cavity ; Pets ; Radiotherapy ; Therapeutic Uses

Purpose: Brachytherapy is essential for treating gynecological cancers as it offers precise radiation delivery to tumors while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The Geneva applicator, introduced in 2020 as a replacement for older models like the Utrecht applicator, enhances MRI-based brachytherapy with improved imaging capabilities and more accurate applicator placement. In 2021, updates to non-reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based 3D brachytherapy planning further promoted the adoption of advanced techniques such as the Geneva applicator. This study aims to commission the Geneva applicator, focusing on wall thickness, dummy marker positions, and source dwell positions to ensure accurate dose delivery and safety. Methods: The commissioning process involved measuring wall thickness in both the longitudinal and transverse directions for the tandem and lunar-shaped ovoid tubes and comparing thesemeasurements with the manufacturer’s specifications. Dummy marker positions were verifiedusing CT imaging, with a focus on alignment tolerances of ±1 mm. Source dwell positions were planned using the Oncentra treatment planning system, with measurements taken using EBT4 film and analyzed with RIT software. Results: Wall thickness measurements and dummy marker positions were within the specified tolerance ranges, confirming their accuracy. The source dwell positions, measured and analyzedthrough multiple tests, were all within the ±1 mm tolerance, ensuring the applicator’s reliability. Conclusions The Geneva applicator met all standards for safe and effective use in brachytherapy.The use of a 3D-printed holder was crucial for precise alignment and measurement. With updated reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based brachytherapy, the Geneva applicator is expected to significantly impact the future of advanced brachytherapy treatments and research.

Purpose: Brachytherapy is essential for treating gynecological cancers as it offers precise radiation delivery to tumors while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The Geneva applicator, introduced in 2020 as a replacement for older models like the Utrecht applicator, enhances MRI-based brachytherapy with improved imaging capabilities and more accurate applicator placement. In 2021, updates to non-reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based 3D brachytherapy planning further promoted the adoption of advanced techniques such as the Geneva applicator. This study aims to commission the Geneva applicator, focusing on wall thickness, dummy marker positions, and source dwell positions to ensure accurate dose delivery and safety. Methods: The commissioning process involved measuring wall thickness in both the longitudinal and transverse directions for the tandem and lunar-shaped ovoid tubes and comparing thesemeasurements with the manufacturer’s specifications. Dummy marker positions were verifiedusing CT imaging, with a focus on alignment tolerances of ±1 mm. Source dwell positions were planned using the Oncentra treatment planning system, with measurements taken using EBT4 film and analyzed with RIT software. Results: Wall thickness measurements and dummy marker positions were within the specified tolerance ranges, confirming their accuracy. The source dwell positions, measured and analyzedthrough multiple tests, were all within the ±1 mm tolerance, ensuring the applicator’s reliability. Conclusions The Geneva applicator met all standards for safe and effective use in brachytherapy.The use of a 3D-printed holder was crucial for precise alignment and measurement. With updated reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based brachytherapy, the Geneva applicator is expected to significantly impact the future of advanced brachytherapy treatments and research.

Purpose: Brachytherapy is essential for treating gynecological cancers as it offers precise radiation delivery to tumors while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The Geneva applicator, introduced in 2020 as a replacement for older models like the Utrecht applicator, enhances MRI-based brachytherapy with improved imaging capabilities and more accurate applicator placement. In 2021, updates to non-reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based 3D brachytherapy planning further promoted the adoption of advanced techniques such as the Geneva applicator. This study aims to commission the Geneva applicator, focusing on wall thickness, dummy marker positions, and source dwell positions to ensure accurate dose delivery and safety. Methods: The commissioning process involved measuring wall thickness in both the longitudinal and transverse directions for the tandem and lunar-shaped ovoid tubes and comparing thesemeasurements with the manufacturer’s specifications. Dummy marker positions were verifiedusing CT imaging, with a focus on alignment tolerances of ±1 mm. Source dwell positions were planned using the Oncentra treatment planning system, with measurements taken using EBT4 film and analyzed with RIT software. Results: Wall thickness measurements and dummy marker positions were within the specified tolerance ranges, confirming their accuracy. The source dwell positions, measured and analyzedthrough multiple tests, were all within the ±1 mm tolerance, ensuring the applicator’s reliability. Conclusions The Geneva applicator met all standards for safe and effective use in brachytherapy.The use of a 3D-printed holder was crucial for precise alignment and measurement. With updated reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based brachytherapy, the Geneva applicator is expected to significantly impact the future of advanced brachytherapy treatments and research.

Purpose: Brachytherapy is essential for treating gynecological cancers as it offers precise radiation delivery to tumors while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The Geneva applicator, introduced in 2020 as a replacement for older models like the Utrecht applicator, enhances MRI-based brachytherapy with improved imaging capabilities and more accurate applicator placement. In 2021, updates to non-reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based 3D brachytherapy planning further promoted the adoption of advanced techniques such as the Geneva applicator. This study aims to commission the Geneva applicator, focusing on wall thickness, dummy marker positions, and source dwell positions to ensure accurate dose delivery and safety. Methods: The commissioning process involved measuring wall thickness in both the longitudinal and transverse directions for the tandem and lunar-shaped ovoid tubes and comparing thesemeasurements with the manufacturer’s specifications. Dummy marker positions were verifiedusing CT imaging, with a focus on alignment tolerances of ±1 mm. Source dwell positions were planned using the Oncentra treatment planning system, with measurements taken using EBT4 film and analyzed with RIT software. Results: Wall thickness measurements and dummy marker positions were within the specified tolerance ranges, confirming their accuracy. The source dwell positions, measured and analyzedthrough multiple tests, were all within the ±1 mm tolerance, ensuring the applicator’s reliability. Conclusions The Geneva applicator met all standards for safe and effective use in brachytherapy.The use of a 3D-printed holder was crucial for precise alignment and measurement. With updated reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based brachytherapy, the Geneva applicator is expected to significantly impact the future of advanced brachytherapy treatments and research.