Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are currently among the most prescribed medications worldwide to relieve pain and reduce inflammation, especially in patients suffering osteoarthritis (OA). However, NSAIDs are known to have adverse effects on the gastrointestinal system. If a gastric ulcer occurs, planned OA treatment needs to be changed, incurring additional treatment costs and causing discomfort for both patients and clinicians. Therefore, it is necessary to create a gastric ulcer prediction model that can reflect the detailed health status of each individual and to use it when making treatment plans. Methods: Using sample cohort data from 2008 to 2013 from the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea, we developed a prediction model for NSAID-induced gastric ulcers using machine-learning algorithms and investigated new risk factors associated with medication and comorbidities. Results: The population of the study consisted of 30,808 patients with OA who were treated with NSAIDs between 2008 and 2013. After a 2-year follow-up, these patients were divided into two groups: without gastric ulcer (n=29,579) and with gastric ulcer (n=1,229). Five machine-learning algorithms were used to develop the prediction model, and a gradient boosting machine (GBM) was selected as the model with the best performance (area under the curve, 0.896; 95% confidence interval, 0.883–0.909). The GBM identified 5 medications (loxoprofen, aceclofenac, talniflumate, meloxicam, and dexibuprofen) and 2 comorbidities (acute upper respiratory tract infection [AURI] and gastroesophageal reflux disease) as important features. AURI did not have a dose-response relationship, so it could not be interpreted as a significant risk factor even though it was initially detected as an important feature and improved the prediction performance. Conclusions We obtained a prediction model for NSAID-induced gastric ulcers using the GBM method. Since personal prescription period and the severity of comorbidities were considered numerically, individual patients’ risk could be well reflected. The prediction model showed high performance and interpretability, so it is meaningful to both clinicians and NSAID users.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are limited published data on the incidence and cost associated with cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) infection for Asian patients. We analyzed the infection burden associated with the implantation of CIEDs in Korea. METHODS: In the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) database during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016, we identified 16,908 patients with CIED implantation. CIED infection was defined as either: 1) Infection-related diagnosis code by the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases after any CIED procedure; or 2) CIED removal along with systemic infection. RESULTS: The proportions of first implantation and replacement were 77.6% and 22.4%, respectively. During the follow-up period of 17.1±10.6 months, a total of 462 patients had CIED infection with incidence of 1.95 per 100 person-years with higher infection rate in replacement than first implantation (3.97 vs. 1.4 per 100 person-years, p<0.001). The average cost per person was US$ 16,584 (pacemaker, $13,736; implantable cardioverter defibrillator, $28,402; cardiac resynchronization therapy, $29,674). The risk factors of CIED infection were generator replacement (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.60–3.78), diabetes mellitus (aHR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.58–2.38), and congestive heart failure (aHR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.51–2.28). CONCLUSIONS The rate of CIED infection in Korea was 1.95 per 100 person-years with average cost of US$ 16,584. The most important risk factor was generator replacement. This result suggests that generator replacement should be performed cautiously to avoid CIED infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, has increased significantly over the past several years. However, limited data exists regarding temporal trends of CIED implantations in Asian population. This study aimed to investigate temporal trends of CIED treatment in Korea. METHODS: Using the National Health Insurance Service database of the entire Korean adult population, temporal trends of CIED procedures between 2009 and 2016 were evaluated. Additionally, temporal changes in the prevalence of patients' comorbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 35,421 CIED procedures (new implantations: 27,771, replacements: 7,650) were performed during the study period. The mean age of new CIED recipients and the prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, stroke, and atrial fibrillation, increased substantially with time. Compared to 2009, the number of new implantations of PM, ICD, and CRT devices increased by 2.0 (1,977 to 3,910), 3.6 (230 to 822), and 4.9 (44 to 217) times in 2016, respectively. The annual new implantation rate of CIED also increased accordingly (5.1 to 9.3 for PM, 0.6 to 1.9 for ICD, and 0.1 to 0.5 for CRT devices, per 100,000 persons). CONCLUSIONS The number of CIED implantation increased substantially from 2009 to 2016 in Korea. Also, the patients with CIED have been changed to be older and have more comorbidities. Therefore, the burden of health care cost in patients with CIED would be expected to increase in the future.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are limited published data on the incidence and cost associated with cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) infection for Asian patients. We analyzed the infection burden associated with the implantation of CIEDs in Korea. METHODS: In the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) database during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016, we identified 16,908 patients with CIED implantation. CIED infection was defined as either: 1) Infection-related diagnosis code by the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases after any CIED procedure; or 2) CIED removal along with systemic infection. RESULTS: The proportions of first implantation and replacement were 77.6% and 22.4%, respectively. During the follow-up period of 17.1±10.6 months, a total of 462 patients had CIED infection with incidence of 1.95 per 100 person-years with higher infection rate in replacement than first implantation (3.97 vs. 1.4 per 100 person-years, p<0.001). The average cost per person was US$ 16,584 (pacemaker, $13,736; implantable cardioverter defibrillator, $28,402; cardiac resynchronization therapy, $29,674). The risk factors of CIED infection were generator replacement (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.60–3.78), diabetes mellitus (aHR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.58–2.38), and congestive heart failure (aHR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.51–2.28). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of CIED infection in Korea was 1.95 per 100 person-years with average cost of US$ 16,584. The most important risk factor was generator replacement. This result suggests that generator replacement should be performed cautiously to avoid CIED infection.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ; Classification ; Cohort Studies ; Defibrillators ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Diagnosis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Failure ; Humans ; Incidence ; Insurance, Health ; Korea ; Risk Factors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, has increased significantly over the past several years. However, limited data exists regarding temporal trends of CIED implantations in Asian population. This study aimed to investigate temporal trends of CIED treatment in Korea. METHODS: Using the National Health Insurance Service database of the entire Korean adult population, temporal trends of CIED procedures between 2009 and 2016 were evaluated. Additionally, temporal changes in the prevalence of patients' comorbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 35,421 CIED procedures (new implantations: 27,771, replacements: 7,650) were performed during the study period. The mean age of new CIED recipients and the prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, stroke, and atrial fibrillation, increased substantially with time. Compared to 2009, the number of new implantations of PM, ICD, and CRT devices increased by 2.0 (1,977 to 3,910), 3.6 (230 to 822), and 4.9 (44 to 217) times in 2016, respectively. The annual new implantation rate of CIED also increased accordingly (5.1 to 9.3 for PM, 0.6 to 1.9 for ICD, and 0.1 to 0.5 for CRT devices, per 100,000 persons). CONCLUSIONS: The number of CIED implantation increased substantially from 2009 to 2016 in Korea. Also, the patients with CIED have been changed to be older and have more comorbidities. Therefore, the burden of health care cost in patients with CIED would be expected to increase in the future.
Adult ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Atrial Fibrillation ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ; Comorbidity ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Epidemiology ; Health Care Costs ; Heart Failure ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Korea ; National Health Programs ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Prevalence ; Stroke