1.Hypoxic Tumor Can be More Responsive to Fractionated Irradiation Combined with SR 4233 (Tirapazamine).
Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology 1994;12(1):9-16
Hypothesis that hypoxic tumors should be more responsive to the addition of preferential hypoxic cell cytotoxin SR 4233 (tirapazamine) to fractionated irradiation was tested in the mouse SCCVII carcinoma and RIF-1 sarcoma, Model of hypoxic tumor was established using the tumor bed effect; tumors growing in the preirradiated tissue (preirradiated tumors) were more hypoxic than tumors growing in the unirradiated tissue (unirradiated tumors). When the tumors reached a mean volume of 100 mmdegree, both unirradiated and preirradiated tumors were treated with a fractionated course of 62 Gy in 3 days or 8 2.5 Gy in 4days with SR 4233 (0.08 mmlo/kg/injuection) given 30 minutes before each irradiation or without SR 4233. Compared to the unirradiated tumors, hypoxic preirradiated tumors were approximately 5 times more resistant to fractionated irradiation alone but were approximately 5 times more responsive to SR 4233. Addition of SR 4233 potentiated the effect of fractionated irradiation in both unirradiated and preirradiated tumors. Potentiation in the preirradiated tumors was morequal to or greater than that in the unirradiated tumors and seemed to be higher for more fractionated treatment. We confirm the hypothesis in a transplantable mouse tumor. Present results suggest that radioresistance of some hypoxic tumors can be overcome with hypoxic cytotoxin.
Animals
;
Anoxia
;
Mice
;
Sarcoma
2.Silent Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients Randomized to Stenting or Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Mandy D MÜLLER ; Lisa M JONGEN ; Aysun ALTINBAS ; Kristine A BLACKHAM ; Paul J NEDERKOORN ; Sumaira MACDONALD ; Rolf JÄGER ; Thomas WOLFF ; Philippe A LYRER ; L Jaap KAPPELLE ; Stephan G WETZEL ; Toby RICHARDS ; Jeroen HENDRIKSE ; Gert J DE BORST ; H Bart VAN DER WORP ; Stefan T ENGELTER ; David J WERRING ; Martin M BROWN ; Leo H BONATI
Journal of Stroke 2019;21(1):116-119
No abstract available.
Carotid Stenosis
;
Cerebral Hemorrhage
;
Endarterectomy
;
Humans
;
Stents
3.Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nolan J. BROWN ; Zach PENNINGTON ; Cathleen C. KUO ; Alexander M. LOPEZ ; Bryce PICTON ; Sean SOLOMON ; Oanh T. NGUYEN ; Chenyi YANG ; Evelyne K. TANTRY ; Hania SHAHIN ; Julian GENDREAU ; Stephen ALBANO ; Martin H. PHAM ; Michael Y. OH
Asian Spine Journal 2023;17(6):1139-1154
Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L-ALIF), which employs laparoscopic cameras to facilitate a less invasive approach, originally gained traction during the 1990s but has subsequently fallen out of favor. As the envelope for endoscopic approaches continues to be pushed, a recurrence of interest in laparoscopic and/or endoscopic anterior approaches seems possible. Therefore, evaluating the current evidence base in regard to this approach is of much clinical relevance. To this end, a systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the following keywords: “(laparoscopic OR endoscopic) AND (anterior AND lumbar).” Out of the 441 articles retrieved, 22 were selected for quantitative analysis. The primary outcome of interest was the radiographic fusion rate. The secondary outcome was the incidence of perioperative complications. Meta-analysis was performed using RStudio’s “metafor” package. Of the 1,079 included patients (mean age, 41.8±2.9 years), 481 were males (44.6%). The most common indication for L-ALIF surgery was degenerative disk disease (reported by 18 studies, 81.8%). The mean follow-up duration was 18.8±11.2 months (range, 6–43 months). The pooled fusion rate was 78.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.9–90.4). Complications occurred in 19.2% (95% CI, 13.4–27.4) of L-ALIF cases. Additionally, 7.2% (95% CI, 4.6–11.4) of patients required conversion from L-ALIF to open surgery. Although L-ALIF does not appear to be supported by studies available in the literature, it is important to consider the context from which these results have been obtained. Even if these results are taken at face value, the failure of endoscopy to have a role in the ALIF approach does not mean that it should not be incorporated in posterior approaches.