Purpose: General surgeons at regional hospitals should have the primary trauma care skills necessary to treat critically ill trauma patients to withstand transfer. This study was conducted to identify a consensus on primary trauma care skills for general surgeons. Methods: An initial list of acute care surgical skills was compiled, and revised by six trauma experts (acute care surgeons); 33 skills were nominated for inclusion in the Delphi consensus survey. Participants (councilors of the Japanese Society for Acute Care Surgery) were presented with the list of 33 trauma care skills and were asked (using web-based software) to rate how strongly they agreed or disagreed (using a 5-point Likert scale) with the necessity of each skill for a general surgeon. The reliability of consensus was predefined as Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.8, and trauma care skills were considered as primarily required when rated 4 (agree) or 5 (strongly agree) by ≥ 80% participants. Results: There were 117 trauma care specialists contacted to participate in the Delphi consensus survey panel. In the 1st round, 85 specialists participated (response rate: 72.6%). In the 2nd round, 66 specialists participated (response rate: 77.6%). Consensus was achieved after two rounds, reliability using Cronbach’s α was 0.94, and 34 items were identified as primary trauma care skills needed by general surgeons. Conclusion A consensus-based list of trauma care skills required by general surgeons was developed. This list can facilitate the development of a new trauma training course which has been optimized for general surgeons.

Objective: To investigate the factors that make observed survival of patients with terminal cancer shorter than oncologists’ estimation. Methods: We retrospectively surveyed the medical records of terminal cancer patients who were referred to our palliative care unit with a predicted survival of 1–3 months and discharged dead from hospital within 3 months. Results: A total of 249 patients were eligible for analysis. One hundred and two patients (41%) had observed survival of less than one month (OS1), and 147 (59%) lived for 1–3 months (OS1–3) as expected. Depressed level of consciousness above Japan Coma Scale II and severely reduced oral intake (a few mouthfuls or less) were associated with unexpected shorter survival. The number of patients who died within two days after sudden deterioration of general condition was significantly higher in OS1 than OS1–3. Conclusion: Although survival of patients with the above factors may be shorter than oncologists’ estimation, it is necessary to examine the physician-side factors that contribute to the inaccuracy of prognosis.