Several studies have reported that molecular hydrogen (H₂) acts as a therapeutic medical gas owing to scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, little is known about effects of H₂ on exercise-induced oxidative stress. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of weekly hydrogen bathing on exercise-induced oxidative stress and delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Nine healthy and active young men participated in this study, and each subject performed hydrogen bathing trial and placebo bathing trial in a crossover design. The subjects performed downhill running (8 % decline) at 75 % peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak) for 30 min, and each subjects conducted hydrogen or placebo bathing for 20 min, respectively, 1-6 days after downhill running. Before and after exercise, we measured visual analogue scale (VAS) and collected blood samples (Pre- and 5 min, 60 min after the end of bathing, 1day, 2days, 3days, 7days after downhill running). Blood sample analyses include creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin (Mb), malondialdehyde (MDA), reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs), biological antioxidant potential (BAP), myeloperoxidase (MPO), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-17a (IL-17a) and lactate concentrations. Weekly hydrogen bathing had no effects of exercise-induced oxidative stress and muscle damage. On the other hand, hydrogen bathing significantly reduced DOMS (VAS) 1 and 2days after downhill running (p=0.033). These findings suggest that hydrogen bath after downhill exercise can be effective for reduction of DOMS.

Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.

Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.

Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.

Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.