1.The Role of BDNF as a Mediator of Neuroplasticity in Bipolar Disorder.
Iria GRANDE ; Gabriel Rodrigo FRIES ; Mauricio KUNZ ; Flavio KAPCZINSKI
Psychiatry Investigation 2010;7(4):243-250
The cognitive impairment and neuroanatomical changes that takes place among patients with bipolar disorder (BD) patients has been well described. Recent data suggest that changes in neuroplasticity, cell resilience and connectivity are the main neuropathological findings in BD. Data from differential lines of research converges to the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as an important contributor to the neuroplasticity changes described among BD patients. BDNF serum levels have been shown to be decreased in depressive and manic episodes, returning to normal levels in euthymia. BDNF has also been shown to decrease as the disorder progresses. Moreover, factors that negatively influence the course of BD, such as life stress and trauma have been shown to be associated with a decrease in BDNF serum levels. These findings suggest that BDNF plays a central role in the progression of BD. The present review discusses the role of BDNF as a mediator of the neuroplastic changes that occur in portion with mood episodes and the potential use of serum BDNF as a biomarker in BD.
Bipolar Disorder
;
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
;
Humans
;
Hypogonadism
;
Mitochondrial Diseases
;
Nerve Growth Factors
;
Neuronal Plasticity
;
Ophthalmoplegia
;
Stress, Psychological
2.Exploring Clinical Subgroups of Participants with Major Depressive Disorder that may Benefit from Adjunctive Minocycline Treatment
Gerard ANMELLA ; Alcy MEEHAN ; Melanie ASHTON ; Mohammadreza MOHEBBI ; Giovanna FICO ; Chee H. NG ; Michael MAES ; Lesley BERK ; Michele De PRISCO ; Ajeet B. SINGH ; Gin S. MALHI ; Michael BERK ; Seetal DODD ; Diego HIDALGO-MAZZEI ; Iria GRANDE ; Isabella PACCHIAROTTI ; Andrea MURRU ; Eduard VIETA ; Olivia M. DEAN
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2024;22(1):33-44
Objective:
To explore illness-related factors in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) recipients of adjunctive minocycline (200 mg/day) treatment. The analysis included participants experiencing MDD from a 12-week, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (RCT).
Methods:
This is a sub-analysis of a RCT of all 71 participants who took part in the trial. The impact of illness chronicity (illness duration and number of depressive episodes), systemic illness (endocrine, cardiovascular and obesity), adverse effects and minocycline were evaluated as change from baseline to endpoint (12-week) using ANCOVA.
Results:
There was a consistent but statistically non-significant trend on all outcomes in favour of the use of adjunctive minocycline for participants without systemic illness, less illness chronicity, and fewer adverse effects.
Conclusion
Understanding the relationship between MDD and illness chronicity, comorbid systemic illness, and adverse effects, can potentially better characterise those individuals who are more likely to respond to adjunctive anti-inflammatory medications.