Humans ; Intestinal Polyps ; Colonic Polyps/surgery* ; Intestinal Polyposis ; Colorectal Neoplasms

Objective: To analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with small bowel tumors. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study. We collected clinicopathological data of patients with primary jejunal or ileal tumors who had undergone small bowel resection in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between January 2012 and September 2017. The inclusion criteria included: (1) older than 18 years; (2) had undergone small bowel resection; (3) primary location at jejunum or ileum; (4) postoperative pathological examination confirmed malignancy or malignant potential; and (5) complete clinicopathological and follow-up data. Patients with a history of previous or other concomitant malignancies and those who had undergone exploratory laparotomy with biopsy but no resection were excluded. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of included patients were analyzed. Results: The study cohort comprised 220 patients with small bowel tumors, 136 of which were classified as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 47 as adenocarcinomas, and 35 as lymphomas. The median follow-up for all patient was 81.0 months (75.9-86.1). GISTs frequently manifested as gastrointestinal bleeding (61.0%, 83/136) and abdominal pain (38.2%, 52/136). In the patients with GISTs, the rates of lymph node and distant metastasis were 0.7% (1/136) and 11.8% (16/136), respectively. The median follow-up time was 81.0 (75.9-86.1) months. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 96.3%. Multivariate Cox regression-analysis results showed that distant metastasis was the only factor associated with OS of patients with GISTs (HR=23.639, 95% CI: 4.564-122.430, P<0.001). The main clinical manifestations of small bowel adenocarcinoma were abdominal pain (85.1%, 40/47), constipation/diarrhea (61.7%, 29/47), and weight loss (61.7%, 29/47). Rates of lymph node and distant metastasis in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma were 53.2% (25/47) and 23.4% (11/47), respectively. The 3-year OS rate of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma was 44.7%. Multivariate Cox regression-analysis results showed that distant metastasis (HR=4.018, 95%CI: 2.108-10.331, P<0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.291, 95% CI: 0.140-0.609, P=0.001) were independently associated with OS of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma. Small bowel lymphoma frequently manifested as abdominal pain (68.6%, 24/35) and constipation/diarrhea (31.4%, 11/35); 77.1% (27/35) of small bowel lymphomas were of B-cell origin. The 3-year OS rate of patients with small bowel lymphomas was 60.0%. T/NK cell lymphomas (HR= 6.598, 95% CI: 2.172-20.041, P<0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.119, 95% CI: 0.015-0.925, P=0.042) were independently associated with OS of patients with small bowel lymphoma. Small bowel GISTs have a better prognosis than small intestinal adenocarcinomas (P<0.001) or lymphomas (P<0.001), and small bowel lymphomas have a better prognosis than small bowel adenocarcinomas (P=0.035). Conclusions: The clinical manifestations of small intestinal tumor are non-specific. Small bowel GISTs are relatively indolent and have a good prognosis, whereas adenocarcinomas and lymphomas (especially T/NK-cell lymphomas) are highly malignant and have a poor prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy would likely improve the prognosis of patients with small bowel adenocarcinomas or lymphomas.
Humans ; Prognosis ; Intestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis* ; Duodenal Neoplasms ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; Lymphoma ; Adenocarcinoma/surgery* ; Constipation ; Abdominal Pain ; Retrospective Studies

Obstructive colorectal cancer is a common malignant bowel obstruction. Colostomy or colostomy following tumor resection may be the first choice for emergency surgery. The intestinal and systemic conditions of patients undergoing emergency surgery are often poor, and patients need to undergo multiple operations, which increase the surgical risk and economic burden and reduce the quality of life of patients. Poor intraoperative visualization may also affect the radical operation of emergency surgery. Transanal decompression tube (TDT) can rapidly decompress and drain the obstructed bowel, effectively relieve obstruction symptoms, and improve the success rate of primary radical resection. The TDT squeeze the tumor lightly, causing no spread of tumor cells, and is cheap, but the cavity of transanal decompression tube is small and easily blocked, and requires tedious flushing or regular replacement. Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) can relieve intestinal obstruction effectively, provide sufficient preparation time for preoperative examination and improvement of nutritional status. By improving patient's tolerance to radical surgery, SEMS might be used as an important treatment strategy choice for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, SEMS may squeeze the tumor, leading to the spread of tumor cells, increase the recurrence rate and metastasis rate, and reduce the survival rate. Moreover, intestinal wall edema still existed during the operation following SEMS, and the rate of ostomy after anastomosis was as high as 34%. We hypothesized that prolonging the interval between stent insertion and surgery to 2 months, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered during this interval (SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy), would help improve outcomes. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy is a safe, effective, and well tolerated treatment approach with a high laparoscopic resection rate, low stoma formation rate and improvement in the overall survival for patients with left-sided colon cancer obstruction. The patient physical status is improved, the primary tumor is downstaged, and intestinal wall edema is relieved during the relatively longer interval between SEMS placement and surgery. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy may be a preferred therapeutic strategy for obstructive left colon cancer.
Humans ; Quality of Life ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects* ; Colonic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Stents/adverse effects* ; Intestinal Obstruction/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Colorectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Retrospective Studies

Adult ; Colon ; Ganglioneuroma/surgery* ; Humans ; Intestinal Neoplasms/surgery*

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of pelvic peritoneal reconstruction and its effect on anal function in laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection of low and middle rectal cancer. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Consecutive patients with low and middle rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopy-assisted transabdominal anterior resection at Naval Military Medical University Changhai Hospital from February 2020 to February 2021 were enrolled. Inclusion criteria: (1) the distance from tumor to the anal verge ≤10 cm; (2) laparoscopy-assisted transabdominal anterior resection of rectal cancer; (3) complete clinical data; (4) rectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by postoperative pathology. Exclusion criteria: (1) emergency surgery; (2) patients with a history of anal dysfunction or anal surgery; (3) preoperative diagnosis of distant (liver, lung) metastasis; (4) intestinal obstruction; (5) conversion to open surgery for various reasons. The pelvic floor was reconstructed using SXMD1B405 (Stratafix helical PGA-PCL, Ethicon). The first needle was sutured from the left anterior wall of the neorectum to the right. Insertion of the needle was continued to suture the root of the sigmoid mesentery while the Hemo-lok was used to fix the suture. The second needle was started from the beginning of the first needle, after 3-4 needles, a drainage tube was inserted through the left lower abdominal trocar to the presacral space. Then, the left peritoneal incision of the descending colon was sutured, after which Hemo-lok fixation was performed. The operative time, perioperative complications, postoperative Wexner anal function score and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score were compared between the study group and the control group. Three to six months after the operation, pelvic MRI was performed to observe and compare the pelvic floor anatomical structure of the two groups. Results: A total of 230 patients were enrolled, including 58 who underwent pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction as the study group and 172 who did not undergo pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction as the control group. There were no significant differences in general data between the two groups (all P>0.05). The operation time of the study group was longer than that of control group [(177.5±33.0) minutes vs. (148.7±45.5) minutes, P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications (including anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, postoperative pneumonia, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, and intestinal obstruction) between the two groups (all P>0.05). Eight cases had anastomotic leakage, of whom 2 cases (3.4%) in the study group were discharged after conservative treatment, 5 cases (2.9%) of other 6 cases (3.5%) in the control group were discharged after the secondary surgical treatment. The Wexner score and LARS score were 3.1±2.8 and 23.0 (16.0-28.0) in the study group, which were lower than those in the control group [4.7±3.4 and 27.0 (18.0-32.0)], and the differences were statistically significant (t=-3.018, P=0.003 and Z=-2.257, P=0.024). Severe LARS was 16.5% (7/45) in study group and 35.5% (50/141) in control group, and the difference was no significant differences (Z=4.373, P=0.373). Pelvic MRI examination 3 to 6 months after surgery showed that the incidence of intestinal accumulation in the pelvic floor was 9.1% (3/33) in study group and 46.4% (64/138) in control group (χ(2)=15.537, P<0.001). Conclusion: Pelvic peritoneal reconstruction using stratafix in laparoscopic anterior resection of middle and low rectal cancer is safe and feasible, which may reduce the probability of the secondary operation in patients with anastomotic leakage and significantly improve postoperative anal function.
Anastomotic Leak/surgery* ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction/surgery* ; Laparoscopy ; Postoperative Complications/surgery* ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Diseases/surgery* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Syndrome ; Treatment Outcome

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ; Humans ; Intestinal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology* ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology*

Colonic Polyps/surgery* ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Humans ; Intestinal Polyposis ; Microsurgery ; Treatment Outcome

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colon, Transverse ; surgery ; Colonic Neoplasms ; complications ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Palliative Care ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents

OBJECTIVETo summarize the application of staged ileostomy and closure operation combined with nutritional support therapy in the treatment of chronic radiation intestinal injury(CRII).

METHODSClinical data of patients with definite radiation history and pathological diagnosis of CRII receiving treatment at Department of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with tumor recurrence during operation or by postoperative pathology were excluded. Patients undergoing stageI( ileostomy and stageII( closure operation combined with nutrition support therapy were enrolled to the cohort. Detailed scheme of stage I( ileostomy and therapeutic time were determined by clinical symptoms and nutritional status. While performing ileostomy, the removal of intestinal lesions depended on range and degree of intestinal injury. Nutritional support therapy and other symptom-relieving therapy were offered after surgery. Timing for stageII( closure operation was decided according to nutritional status of patients. Lesions of remaining intestine were determined during operation, then necessary intestinal resection and closure operation were performed. Adhesion classification of radiation intestinal injury (total five levels) proposed by our center was adopted to evaluate the level and range of intestinal lesions. Level 0 indicated no adhesion between injured intestinal loop and surrounding organs; level 1 indicated that the adhesion and fibrosis were limited to right pelvis; level 2 indicated that the adhesion included all pelvis and the adhesion was severe and difficult to divide; level 3 was the forward extension of level 2 adhesion, which was between injured intestinal loop and anterior pelvic wall; level 4 was the upward extension of level 3 adhesion, which was between injured intestinal loop and anterior abdominal wall. Clavien-Dindo classification (lower level means milder symptom) and complication comprehensive index(CCI, lower CCI means milder symptom) calculated by on-line program (http:∕∕www.assessurgery. com) were applied to estimate postoperative complications. Resected intestinal length, adhesion classification of radiation intestinal injury, postoperative complications and time to total enteral nutritional (TEN) of both surgeries and nutritional status (body mass index and serum albumin) were compared between stageI( ileostomy and stageII( closure operation.

RESULTSTwenty-one patients were enrolled in the research with 2 males and 19 females. Primary tumor included 14 cervical cancers, 3 rectal cancers, 1 endometrial cancer, 1 ovarian carcinoma, 1 seminoma and 1 mixed germ cell tumor. Median interval between the end of radiation and radiation intestinal injury was 7(2 to 91) months and median interval between the incidence of radiation intestinal injury and ileostomy was 5(<1 to 75) months. Operative indications for ileostomy were obstruction in 14 cases (66.7%), intestinal internal fistula in 1 case (4.8%), intestinal outer fistula in 2 cases (9.5%), radiation proctitis in 3 cases (14.3%) and acute intestinal perforation in 1 case (4.8%). Average age of patients undergoing stageI( ileostomy was 48 (18 to 60) years with BMI (17.0±2.7) kg/m and serum albumin (36.8±5.2) g/L. Patients undergoing stageII( closure operation had significantly higher BMI [(18.4±2.0) kg/m, t=-2.747, P=0.013] and higher serum albumin [(40.8±3.6) g/L, t=-3.505, P=0.002]. Average interval between stageI( ileostomy and stageII( closure surgery was (197±77) days. Resected intestinal length of stageI( ileostomy was which was significantly longer than that of stageII( closure surgery [(74.0±56.1) cm vs. (15.5±10.4) cm, t=4.547, P= 0.000]. Abdominal adhesion classification of stageII( ileostomy plus closure operation was significantly better as compared to stage I( ileostomy(Z=-3.347, P=0.001). Morbidity of postoperative complications in stageI( ileostomy was 52.4% (11/21), which decreased to 19.0% (4/21) in stageII( operation with significant difference (χ²=5.081, P=0.024). Postoperative complication Clavien-Dindo classification and CCI scores in stageII( operation were significantly lower than those in stageI( operation (P=0.006 and P=0.002). Till June 2017, 17 of 21 patients(81.0%) were followed-up for (28±18) months. Except for 2 cases of relapse, 15 patients recovered to normal diet.

CONCLUSIONSApplication of staged ileostomy and closure operation combined with nutritional support therapy to CRII is in accordance with the principle of injury control surgery. Furthermore, this staged approach is safe and effective, can reduce the morbidity and the severity of complications, and can also be helpful to decide the margin for intestinal resection.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Female ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; Intestinal Diseases ; etiology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; Nutritional Support ; Postoperative Complications ; Radiation Injuries ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

To compare the safety and efficacy between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and radical surgery (RS) for the treatment of large colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LST) larger than 50 mm in diameter. 
 Methods: From January 2011 to January 2016, a total of 82 patients were diagnosed as large LST without deep submucosal invasion (T1 SM2, ≥1 000 µm) in the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Among them, 52 patients were treated by ESD and the other 30 patients were treated by RS [laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC)/open colectomy (OC)]. The clinic data were retrospectively analyzed and the en-bloc resection rate, en-bloc R0 resection rate, local recurrence, complication, procedure time and hospital stay were collected and analyzed.
 Results: The lesion sizes were (5.80±1.20) cm and (5.53±0.69) cm in diameter for ESD and RS groups, respectively (P>0.05). En-bloc resection rates, en-bloc R0 resection rates and recurrence rates showed no significant difference between the ESD group and RS group (P>0.05). Complication rate of the ESD group (7.69%, 4/52) was much lower than that in the RS group (33.33%, 10/30; P<0.01). The ESD group also had a shorter hospital stay and operation time than the RS group (P<0.05).
 Conclusion: ESD appears to be a safe, minimal invasive and effective strategy for treating large LST and it is obviously better than RS in the aspects of hospital stay, operation time and short-term complication.
Colorectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Dissection ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ; standards ; Humans ; Intestinal Mucosa ; pathology ; surgery ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; pathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome